Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russo-German war

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. If you believe a move to a different title is appropriate, please start a discussion on the article talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 23:17, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Russo-German war[edit]

Russo-German war (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neither entry is a war article, but rather about a front in a war, nor do people call either overall conflict the "Russo-German War". Also, descriptive terms do not make suitable dab pages. Eastern Front is where these entries belong (and are listed). Clarityfiend (talk) 12:07, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 14:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Like the editor above, I simply don't see any reason to delete this. Is it causing problems with linking accurately to some other article? If not, what does it matter if we keep it? (I also feel the need to point out that calling these "a front, not a war" is reasonably accurate in English-language historiography, but that's not the case globally - see for example the German title of the Eastern Front of WWII article, de:Deutsch-Sowjetischer Krieg.) -- asilvering (talk) 03:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:21, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. "Russo-German war" is a real term, found in the titles of books and articles, although overwhelmingly in reference to WWII. Srnec (talk) 18:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. Also I don't share Clarityfiend's view that Dab pages are not for descriptive terms, but for actual titles. As WP:D2D states Disambiguation is required whenever, for a given word or phrase on which a reader might search, there is more than one existing Wikipedia article to which that word or phrase might be expected to lead. For instance, Joker, the example used by the guideline, links several works where one the character is called "Joker" even though it's not in the title. JBchrch talk 18:55, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.