Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Bhadauria Damras

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 11:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjay Bhadauria Damras

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, non-elected politician. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOLITICIAN. Already moved to draft by other reviewer Draft:Sanjay Bhadauria Damras. GermanKity (talk) 17:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 17:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 17:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GermanKity (talk) 17:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:54, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – unsuccessful candidates don't meet WP:NPOL, and I'm not finding sufficient non-trivial coverage to meet the GNG. The article can be recreated if he ever wins a seat in the legislature. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:20, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom lacks significant coverage hence fails WP:GNG. Peneplavím (talk) 16:51, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It seems to me like Wikipedia is getting a flood of new articles about Indian politicians or wannabe politicians over the past few months. I've seen others in similar shape. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:37, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No indication of meeting NPOL or GNG. -- Ab207 (talk) 15:29, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG & NPOL. TheDreamBoat (talk) 05:08, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.