Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Danough
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:18, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Scott Danough (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Currently doesn't pass WP:NMUSIC as he doesn't have individual notability outside the bands he played with. I didn't find sufficient sources through with a WP:BEFORE search to pass NMUSIC or WP:GNG. Suonii180 (talk) 12:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, United States of America, and California. Suonii180 (talk) 12:52, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Does not meet GNG criteria and is not notable, so should be deleted. Go4thProsper (talk) 20:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.