Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Zarinegar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 14:11, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Zarinegar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable BLP. None of the sources discuss the subject except in passing and only in relation to the company. The subject lacks sufficient coverage, and is largely unsourced. Bilby (talk) 23:43, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - and possibly merge. Web search reveals only social media profiles, the odd financial filing reports regarding the company, and little else. The company itself doesn't seem notable (but that's a conversation for another AfD). As Bilby says, sources are about the company anyway. It also reads like an autobiography, and more specifically like a LinkedIn page (WP:LINKEDIN). Fails WP:ANYBIO - no significant award (the award mentioned is "Emerging market leader" for the company (under it's former name), where he is mentioned as 'Sean Zar'? in a not particularly notable publicationm, and no obvious significant contribution to the field. If the company is notable, I'd suggest merging a short bio as a section (a lot of the content is promotional) Olly^{say hi} 16:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Yes, I think that, the page can be merged with the company page as a new section.--27century (talk) 20:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as certainly questionable for the applicable independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 06:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:57, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not independently notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 11:10, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.