Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sega Australia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Sega. MBisanz talk 13:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sega Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The fact that Sega set up a subsidiary rather than a branch in Australia is entirely non-notable (and is in fact not even mentioned in the references to this article).
The fact that Sega has significant operations in Australia is a possibly notable fact that (if notable) should be included (along with relevant additional details, which those in this article may or may not be) in the main article.
Recommendation: add whatever material from here may be of interest to the main article, and delete this one (agnostic on whether a redirect is kept, though it seems unlikely that anyone would search for this term). Bongomatic 11:52, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to the Sega article. Whether if it's a subsidiary or branch it's notable for the Sega article but not on it's own. Bidgee (talk) 11:56, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Bidgee (talk) 11:58, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 12:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
pert (Talk) 21:18, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't Merge with Sega. If there were more sources, there would be more stuff to write about but Sega Australia only started up late last year so not much has been written about them. If this is so insignificant, then delete Nintendo Australia then as well or Atari Australia. Maybe even Red Ant Enterprises. Tightarses.--Daftpunkboy93 (talk) 21:18, 12 November 2008 (AEST)
- Merge with Sega, a (so far) non-notable subsidiary entity. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- Merge with Sega as there really isn't enough coverage in reliable third-party sources to create a quality non-stub article. Merging it with the main Sega article, they'd be better together than apart. Randomran (talk) 18:22, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep since none to next to nothing of this info will be kept on wikipedia if merged --sss333 (talk) 08:23, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.