Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spacepunk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 07:37, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Unused neologism. The article content appears to be unsourced original research; no proof that anyone considers this a real genre. Delete. —Matthew Brown (T:C) 07:23, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As with the others. --Ccranium 15:07, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unencyclopedic. NN, OR, UV. - EurekaLott 15:24, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. rodii 21:00, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep ComputerJoe 21:34, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Being the author of this article I wish it to be deleted. Piecraft 21:46, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all this punkcruft. We should have listed all of these into a consolidated AfD. Jamie (talk/contribs) 03:03, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Johhny-turbo 20:35, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't think the two "keep" votes for this should be counted because no reason was given. This is quite clearly a nonexistent term. Ashibaka tock 02:16, 29 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.