Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taelon pages

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:27, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Taelon Commonality (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Also nominated: Da'an (Earth: Final Conflict) Quo'on Zo'or

Non-notable fictional concept along with three non-notable members of the alien species. Neiter the concept nor the species nor the individual members of the species have independent reliable sources that establish notability. All rely entirely on primary, in-universe sources and amount to little more than character biographies and speculation. Expired PRODs removed, which in my opinion should obligate the removing editor to improve the articles on the spot. Except that can't be done here because there are no sources to support them. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 21:50, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge some content into an article Species of Earth: Final Conflict, along with:

Atavus

Kimera (fictional species)

Jaridian (Currently under PROD)

Taelon (Currently under PROD)

Some of the content could be transwiki'd into http://earthfinalconflict.wikia.com/ if anyone can be bothered. Zangar (talk) 06:44, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Except that the same lack of notability and reliable sourcing that plague the individual articles would also make the hypothetical list untenable. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 13:00, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.