Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technical Master

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Technical Master (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources to support this as a widespread term. Rusf10 (talk) 23:16, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 23:16, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No evidence that there is any such thing, let alone anything notable that is different from a technical director. -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lacks indepth trival coverage fails GNG. Purosinaloense T/K 10:03, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Cites no sources, and no sources seem to exist. bop34 • talk • contribs 12:02, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No reliable sources, no evidence of notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 08:19, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete From searching, most cases apply this term as a high praise of someone's technical skill, but it's never a proper title. A lot of hits also use it to describe sportsmen or physicians. Sometimes searches comes up as something like "Technical Master Class", but it's still not an official designation unlike other theatrical positions. Estheim (talk) 12:06, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.