Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dawn of Chaos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:47, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a WarCraft III mod that has yet to be completed. The author is more than welcome to recreate this article when the mod is out and see if it passes muster, but right now it violates WP:NOT. Previously created at Dawn of chaos. Danny Lilithborne 08:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• delete, non-notable. yandman 09:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. All information is an unbiased representation of what already exists within the mod, as seen through the multiple demos the development team has released. No endorsement of its download or the website that hosts it is included, nor is there even currently a link to the website it is hosted by. This violates none of the WP:NOT rules in terms of advertisement. What rule specifically are you referring to? Or do you have any suggestions as to how to expand it over the next day to make it fit the criteria you think it is missing? Also, as for things that are not complete being listed on Wikipedia, you might also want to report Splinter_Cell_4as it will not be released until late October. Johnathan Drake 9:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I have made a lot of updates and corrections over the past few hours. Let me know if that is sufficient, and thanks in advance for taking the time to help me with it. Also, here is another link to an unreleased game: The_Fool_and_His_Money. Perhaps the speculation notice would be sufficient instead of... complete deletion of the topic. Johnathan Drake 12:36, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. The entirety of the references for this article are an interview at a fansite and a bunch of forum links. Since this isn't even done yet and the article was written by the creator, I'm inclined to doubt that there's anything else. This isn't anything like Splinter Cell 4, which has had widespread mainstream press coverage already. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 19:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Changing my vote to delete for the reason cited above. Johnathan Drake 23:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, does not show notability. Vectro 03:58, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above Percy Snoodle 12:52, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.