Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Ocel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:18, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Ocel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be non-notable, only able to find WP:ROUTINE coverage Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:MILL. The article asserts that he has worked steadily in the theatre, first as a stage manager and now as a director, but not all stage directors are notable. -- Ssilvers (talk) 02:01, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:54, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems to have some renown in various theater pieces [1], [2] and [3], in the USA and Ireland. These aren't extensive coverage, but seem to be well-known. Oaktree b (talk) 01:09, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep managed to find several sources through a simple Google search, [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Several sources on Google Books, including multiple mentions in With Our Good Will 30 Years of Shakespeare in Idaho, Agamemnon in Performance 458 BC to AD 2004, and A Directory of Shakespeare in Performance Since 1991 Volume 3, USA and Canada, and several sources on Google Scholar. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 01:47, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For more input on the sources presented above...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:19, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: per GoldenBootWizard276 and Oaktree b.

Please perform more thorough WP:Before prior to nominations Jack4576 (talk) 06:27, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Several scholarly sources mention Ocel and analyze his work. His productions have also been reviewed in several publications. This article needs better sourcing, but the subject definitely meets WP:GNG and WP:DIRECTOR. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:21, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.