Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Too Lost

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by user:Diannaa as a copyvio. SpinningSpark 15:47, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Too Lost (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No significant independent secondary coverage. The one review of the business that I could find was on a site blacklisted by Wikipedia, which means that that article must not be used to help establish notability. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:15, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Business, and United States of America. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:15, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I believe this page should not be deleted and here's why. Too Lost is a music distribution company that has became very popular in the music music distribution community having over 75.000 artist using it. I created the page since the company did not have a wikipedia page and wanted to contribute to publish more info about the company. I provided all the necessary credit and did research on the company to verify all information. I'm very passionate about music and believe everything posted is credible and plan to publish more information about the company. Also for the first article I posted that was blacklisted was made by mistake and corrected the error once I found out it was blacklisted. There were no outlandish claims being made in those news articles and merlin has confirmed that Too Lost is a partner WrightyTighty (talk) 02:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete; fails WP:GNG. Veracity of information does not imply notability. No significant independent secondary sources. Iseult ^Δx parlez moi 08:49, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.