Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TradeStrike

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:42, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TradeStrike (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article for cryptocurrency company. The current version is what's left after the press releases, slightly-reskinned press release reprints, dead Medium article links, and reference links that didn't exist were removed. A WP:BEFORE shows zero coverage of the firm in RSes, and very little coverage even in crypto non-RSes. There is no evidence of notability for this firm, either general or specific. David Gerard (talk) 08:06, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Finance, and United Kingdom. David Gerard (talk) 08:06, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I also dug up refs, and almost had a glimmer of hope when I found a Yahoo! Finance article, only to find out it was paid for by the company. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 08:11, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Suggestion: Draftify - Article creator here, aiming to build the article on neutral perspectives and I did have the assumption that I created the article prematurely. I think moving it to draft space per WP:DRAFTIFY as I do believe there is some merit for this article meeting WP guidelines. This way I can contribute within time to find more rs, and have it created through proper channels. GR86 (📱) 10:21, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

also sources like this aren't considered rs - 1? I have also included in 2 it seems like a rs GR86 (📱) 10:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. GR86 (talk) 11:36, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete more crypto fluff. Sources are all press-release type things or posted on non RS websites. Oaktree b (talk) 13:18, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete only really finding paid promotional or similar sources. Skynxnex (talk) 14:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete PR pieces, I cant find anything noteworthy, thus I don't believe the page meets notability guidelines per WP:ORG.Melancholyhelper (talk) 15:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.