Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trilogy (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR.) (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000^(talk) 11:47, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Trilogy_(company)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Only 1 valid ref. 2 other refs are from paid PR sites, resulting in biased editing, which violates WP policy: What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion InfinityBird (talk) 08:50, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 19:57, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:34, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep- The Rolling Stone ref is valid significant coverage - here's a link [1], and the Harvard Business Review is also RS. My concern is that both sources focus heavily on the company's recruitment practices, and the company's notability seems to rest almost solely on that.Dialectric (talk) 08:51, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.