Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UMBEL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

UMBEL

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertorial written by developer's CEO. Has attracted some interest in the academic community, but not a whole lot of secondary sources to speak for it. (Citation counts for these papers are 2 and 0 on GScholar.) QVVERTYVS (hm?) 23:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 23:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 23:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 23:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there are no other better sources for better notability yet. SwisterTwister talk 05:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is supposed to be a summary of information from third party sources. This fails WP:GNG. Blue Rasberry (talk) 18:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.