Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultras White Knights

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:09, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ultras White Knights

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization with no reliable sourcing. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 06:56, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It is hard to determine notability because this is a Arab organization. But existing web sources and article appear to make this article notable. Ikip (talk) 08:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability may be more difficult to determine, but that doesn't mean this unsourced and chatty article has any legs to stand on (and I removed a lot of the real problematic stuff already before the Gentleman came to the article). The references you suggested, Ikip, may not be so legible to me, but their sources are: blogs. Not a single newspaper hit that I saw. Drmies (talk) 20:30, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack of independent, reliable sources to justify notability of the subject Spiderone 12:29, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Giant Snowman 16:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 16:28, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.