Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Nations Security Council Resolution 2619

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Speedy delete as requested by the author of the article (CSD G7), but in any case it was pretty certainly heading for consensus not to be kept as an article. As for the suggestions of redirecting or adding a mention to another article, any editor is, of course, free to do either or both of those. JBW (talk) 09:25, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

United Nations Security Council Resolution 2619

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

UN Security Council resolutions aren't presumed notable and the evil of navboxes encourages these sorts of creations. I didn't find sources to support general notability and this information should be at UNSMIL, not a standalone article. Redirects are costly. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Libya. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:27, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with United Nations Support Mission in Libya: I think it would be beneficial to briefly mention this at the parent page, but I concur that this is an utter WP:GNG fail. Curbon7 (talk) 02:44, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to United Nations Support Mission in Libya. With no independent sources cited, this does not appear to pass WP:GNG. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:29, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Despite being the author, agree with all of the above. My vote would be to to delete and not even redirect as it is just a 3 month extension of the mandate in an arbitrary year. Thanks for the feedback. Geopony (talk) 08:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.