Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vyavastha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) clpo13_(talk) 09:42, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vyavastha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of the article does not meet the basic criteria for notability. No reliable sources exist. Pixarh (talk) 17:36, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Expanded searches:

year:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

writer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

producer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

music:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

production"(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AND looking with WP:INDAFD finds "Vyavastha" "Ritesh Shetty" "Naeem Ejaz" "Kranti Shanbhag" "Gurmeet Singh" "Kapil Jhaveri" "Shailendra Kumar" "Abstract Thought Production"

Pardon Pixarh but the topic IS sourcable and at the time of your nomination did include a poorly formatted citation. However, and even though it is citable, since we have no confirmation that filming has begun, I would suggest a temporary delete as simply being TOO SOON. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 23:41, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Yes I understand the notability of the people associated with it but the film itself? The article so far only has this[1], this [2] and this [3] and none of the three is a WP:RS. Perhaps a temporary delete would be fine for now. Because finding WP:RS is necessary so unless that is met, the article cannot stand for now. Pixarh (talk) 02:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which is specifically why Pixarh, even with minor mention in acceptable source Bollywood Hungama, I suggested a temporary delete. It might never return. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 07:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 01:35, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hello, how can I improve the article. pls suggest. Shruti.mii (talk) 11:33, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pixarh, I'd like to add to the content of the article if properly explained what exactly is needed to mark it's importance. Thanks. Shruti.mii (talk) 06:49, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:56, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.