Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walt Strony

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Star Mississippi 17:44, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Walt Strony (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO / WP:GNG, or have a suitable WP:ATD. Boleyn (talk) 12:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep There is an immense amount coverage particularly in organ magazines, reviews of other work, his work reviewed in at least two continents. The man has had a long career. Lots of GBooks refs. I think it needs a copyedit to remove the early WP:PRIMARY stuff and promote the WP:SECONDARY. He even has his own signature organ product line, organ review (physical instrument review) how it sounds, how it should sound (Never knew they did that). scope_creepTalk 15:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:15, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Walt is an internationally known and highly esteemed classical and theatre organist. He has published arrangements, as well as an authoritative book on theatre organ registrations.
I don't know how to edit citations, but #6 should be:
Theatre Organ Journal of the American Theatre Organ Society, Vol. 54, No.1, January-February 2012, page 31.
  1. 21 should be:
Theatre Organ Journal of the American Theatre Organ Society, Vol. 54, No.1, January-February 2012, page 28. Wmcoale (talk) 23:52, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Change the keep above for accuracy and for brevity's sake. scope_creepTalk 20:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.