Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Seemann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

William Seemann

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to find any reliable sources to verify the information in the article and sufficiently establish notability. There are two generations of William Seemanns in this book, one of them may be this William Seemann or they could be his father and grandfather but no way to figure which because there are no dates in the article. Either way I don't think anything in the book reaches the level of notability. This inventor does not appear to meet WP:GNG. J04n(talk page) 01:35, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. -- —Mike moral ♪♫ 03:04, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. —Mike moral ♪♫ 03:04, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, Markiewp (talk) 05:44, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Diego Grez (talk) 22:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. Joaquin008 ^(talk) 12:51, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No references. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 15:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.