Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Youth Organization (United Kingdom)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per the consensus here and the previous AFD's consensus (as well as the consensus at the two other AFDs linked in the discussion below), this article's subject is found to lack notability. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

World Youth Organization (United Kingdom)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization, fails WP:ORG. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:53, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I represent the WYO and we were distressed to see the page had been marked for deletion. We'd welcome any help in rectifying issues with the page. Thanks. JackMeeson (talk) 20:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the previous AFD discussion (WP:GNG and WP:NCORP). There are some sources that discuss the launch of the organization, but there doesn't seem to exist significant secondary coverage on the company itself. I mostly see primary and self-published sources, and because of this, I feel that it's WP:TOOSOON for an article at this time. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 20:57, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - simply because there's just not enough coverage yet. I would wager that this organisation will no doubt be notable in the future, but they need to be in Wikipedia because of what they do, not what they may do - and they were only founded a month ago. I'd encourage the contributors to definitely reconsider writing the article in 6 months - with some significant national press under their belt. However WP can't serve as a directory for up and comings. Certainly a case of WP:TOOSOON Olly^{say hi} 08:31, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - article fails notability criteria for WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:GNG. No evidence of any significant coverage by independent reliable sources -- only blogs or trivial local news press releases about a single event. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 15:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE - this article is also part of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kieran Goodwin and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kieran Max Goodwin and the subsequent sockpuppet reports and blocks from those AFDs. This relates to previous attempts by socks and SPA meat puppet accounts at self-promotion of Kieran Goodwin and the World Youth Organization. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:03, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.