Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World of Warcraft - The Freezing Blockade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was 40-man delete. Krimpet (talk) 02:04, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

World of Warcraft - The Freezing Blockade[edit]

WP:NOT, specifically Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. This article is 100% speculation, and so are all the sources. Can be recreated later, when decent sources become available. SuperDT 06:16, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Less substantive that even crystalballing at this point, Wikipedia is also not for things made up while waiting to raid one day. Serpent's Choice 06:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as speculation not even worthy of the name crystalballism. Just someone asking a bunch of questions. I suspect this is just someone with time to kill since today's a big patch day. DarkAudit 11:54, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As per above. DBZROCKS 12:38, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wow-expansion plans may be discussed in the main article (there's enough existing speculation from reputable sources that it can be documented to exist, so a short paragraph wouldn't be unwarranted), but this isn't the way to do it. FrozenPurpleCube 15:09, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Serpent's Choice. ---Cathal 15:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, blatant speculation, wholly unsourced. Arkyan  ^(talk) 16:08, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Serpent's Choice.Bastun^{BaStun not BaTsun} 16:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless I can have a Having a monkey would be cool page. Slavlin 19:24, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator, pure World of Warcruft speculation. Burntsauce 23:17, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:CRYSTAL. "World of Warcruft" -- cute. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Actions • Words)))} 00:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The likelihood of the article being a hoax is considerably high. After all, why would a game developer give such an odd name that doesn't make any sense? Either way, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.--Kylohk 16:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.