Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youmail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. W.marsh 13:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spam for a non notable product offered by a non notable company Nuttah68 08:06, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Why is this even at AFD? MER-C 08:08, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - presume the nomintator brought it here because the advert tag was regularly removed by the creator and an anon - it was never proded, but I think it would have been removed just a quickly.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 12:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, why does spam like this have to go through a five day deletion debate? MER-C 13:02, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as a failure to meet the product criteria in WP:CORP and does not cite reliable sources.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 12:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Delete - Maybe the article just needs to be updated? I know that it's owned by a company out of New Zealand called Zeacom, that's been around for more than a decade - they're in like 20 countries. I'm using it and it's very much a reliable product/company... regarding reliable sources, they were just in the New Zealand Herald last Monday. Not sure who these people are who are bashing the article - perhaps they could do some research and update the article?! I'm new to wikis but starting to contribute on subjects that are close to me. As a user, I think this should stay. posted by: Kelly, kellyeboyle@hotmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.187.140.162 (talk • contribs)

Do Not Delete - Yes, I posted this article and I don't think it should be deleted. Zeacom (whole owner of Youmail) is absolutely a notable firm - in existence 11 years, with 2000 business running this software and more than 60,000 end users in 21 countries, offices in Irvine California, Atlanta Georgia, Auckland New Zealand, Sydney and Melbourne Australia and Brighton, UK. If I've made a mistake of some sort in my posting, please help me correct it but please don't delete it. This is NOT an advertisement, nor is it intended to be. It is merely a statement of fact. And if I do say so, when reading there is no use of persuasiveness or selling at all. There isn't even a reference to the site! Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Brickley.

Delete Reads like an advertisement, no quotes from reliable sources, lacks notability. I think this qualifies for speedy delete under WP:CSD G11. If it becomes a substantial company, and they have a better article, they could resubmit later. EdJohnston 04:29, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.