Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaena

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:39, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zaena

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability. This is clearly created by a PR flack, judging by the number of articles recently created about related product. TheLongTone (talk) 14:52, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:55, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:55, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails WP:ARTIST. And indeed, it does appear to be PR stuff -- the associated Maek label has had a lot of bad promotional articles written lately. -IagoQnsi (talk) 22:53, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agreed. I'm looking over a few AfD this morning and I notice the Maek label is creating wikipages that use as references HypeMagazine, a service that sells "advertorials" wherein the customer purchases their own press coverage. ShelbyMarion (talk) 11:04, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.