Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaman Group of Industries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 02:19, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zaman Group of Industries[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, tagged as such since created in 2010. Speedy and PROD at that time were contested by article creators. Cited sources are mere directory listings. Searches of the usual Google types, HighBeam, EBSCO, The Daily Star, The Financial Express, Prothom Alo, The Independent (Dhaka), and Daily Sun (for "Zaman Group", the managing director, and several subsidiaries) returned: a single photo caption for Syed Asaduzzaman. There is an Al Zaman Group on the Arabian Peninsula, and other Zaman Groups in Kazakhstan, Los Angeles, Pakistan, and Turkey, but could not find significant coverage in reliable sources of this one in Bangladesh, so fails WP:CORP. Worldbruce (talk) 16:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 16:51, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 16:51, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there are no convincing signs of a better notable article. SwisterTwister talk 21:45, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:50, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable, no third-party sources. Bishonen | talk 19:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.