Jump to content

Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2010 September 17

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

17 September 2010[edit]

Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2010-09-17 Edit

2010-09-17 (Suspected copyright violations)[edit]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Single author. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:36, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Single author. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:36, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:36, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. False positive. Mirror site. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:45, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 16:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:01, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article blanked for evaluation and closure through WP:CP. Probably speediable, but I want them to notice that it's blanked and why. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:39, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rewrite on temp page, haven't checked it for usability. VernoWhitney (talk) 12:47, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:07, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Cut and paste move fixed by investigator or others. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:56, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Deleted and recreated clean. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:33, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:56, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. deleted and recreated clean. VernoWhitney (talk) 00:27, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. History restored for attribution. VernoWhitney (talk) 01:22, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Excised. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:47, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 02:02, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • OTRS pending but not yet verified, relisting under today's entry. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:47, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. VernoWhitney (talk) 01:18, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)[edit]

As owner of chiangmaibest.com I hereby permit re-use of all articles to Wikipedia and Wikimedia Foundation under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License. This applies to the Chiang Mai Flower Festival article as well as all other articles. --Jeffmcneill (talk) 11:04, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S., I've sent the email to the wikipedia admin as per instructions --Jeffmcneill (talk) 11:24, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Section 'History' tagged rather than whole article. Section rewritten on temp page. -- Starbois (talk) 14:13, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Err, is anybody going to do anything about this. The article has been blanked out with an ugly looking template for eight days now. There has been replacement text in the temporary area for six days. -- Starbois (talk) 16:45, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Someone will get to it probably later today. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, sorry for the delay. As you'll note, the instructions under "New Listings" say "Entries in this section are newer than 7 days and should not be processed. This gives time for the original authors of the article to deal with the problem." They don't come current until they're older than 8 days. Still, I'm sorry that I had failed to note your response at the article's talk page. Given your concerns whether the original article actually did constitute a copyright problem, I'll process as soon as I know if you'd rather I ask another opinion. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:26, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:47, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]