Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Capcom Five/archive1
- Contributor(s): User:Axem Titanium; other major contributors to the articles themselves include User:Guyinblack25 and User:JimmyBlackwing (PN03), User:Hibana (Viewtiful Joe), and User:Niemti (RE4)
Looks like this doesn't have 50% FA so how do I nominate it for GT? :) User:GamerPro64 suggested that I nominate this after RE4 hit GA in October. I've worked on three of these articles, Capcom Five, Killer7, and PN03 (the latter as a copyeditor and supporting contributor; Guy and Jimmy did the heavy lifting IIRC), so I can vouch for their quality. Viewtiful Joe (A-class) and RE4 both read very well now, and RE4 especially has come a long way since I last saw it. You may be confused as to why the Capcom Five topic only has 4 sub-articles but this is because the 5th game, Dead Phoenix, does not have its own article. I don't believe there are any other gaps or potential articles to expand the scope of the topic to. --Axem Titanium (talk) 15:53, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support. I remember reviewing the parent article before, and read the others out of curiosity at that time. I do wonder if it's a good idea to include a piped link to Capcom Five#Dead Phoenix, marked with
to indicate it has received a review (as part of the full article) while not being a reviewed article itself. It's technically unnecessary but if the other delegates are okay with the idea it would be a good way to explain the "four is not five" question. GRAPPLE X 16:01, 27 November 2012 (UTC) - Support, but no need for a link to Dead Phoenix- if it doesn't have an article there's no point faking one for the box. --PresN 17:09, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: Good to see that this has finally made it to GTC. I'd forgotten that I contributed to the topic—otherwise, I'd give it a support. The only potential gap in coverage I can see (and this is a long shot) is Shinji Mikami, since he oversaw the games. However, in my opinion, his article shouldn't be added, since the topic is about the games themselves. Anyway, great work. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 17:16, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support great job. igordebraga ≠ 22:52, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
- Support. I've also been waiting for this to be on GTC :) Neat little topic. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:37, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support As is. —Andrewstalk 01:40, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Tomcat (7) 18:58, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- Closed with a consensus to promote to Good Topic - GamerPro64 20:02, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
