Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 March 30

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Parks and Recreation Camping.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hunter Kahn (notify | contribs | uploads).

Non-free TV episode screenshot. Apparently random scene, not embedded in analytical commentary in the article, not needed to understand article, purely decorative infobox use. Fails NFCC#8 Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:38, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I had thought a visual of Toms tent would be helpful since it was discussed in the article but it's probably not the best pic so I'm ok with it being deleted if need be. — Hunter Kahn 14:16, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per above. Not very good picture. Wilbysuffolk (talk) 02:40, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I haven't watch this series (though the picture seems reasonable given the episode title), so I'll trust my fellow editors in that a better screenshot for purposes of identification can be found. ^walk victor falk ^talk 10:48, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:HPB-Fall2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ceddy06 (notify | contribs | uploads).

stated use is "To inform those that North Harris has a HPB opening Fall 2010" which can easily be conveyed by the words quoted. Clear failure of WP:NFCC#1 - replaceable with a free (text) alternative. Peripitus (Talk) 10:31, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. ^walk victor falk ^talk 17:30, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Wilbysuffolk (talk) 02:41, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dscoverche-gandhi.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Polaris999 (notify | contribs | uploads).

Non-free image of a magazine cover that is not discussed anywhere in the article. Even the magazine issue itself is only mentioned on the image's caption. Damiens.rf 13:09, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This does not bring enough additional value to the article. More informative would be something illustrating how the Alberto Korda photo became an iconic stencil. ^walk victor falk ^talk 17:40, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Words not needed as in diffrent language. Should just be picture which is not very good. Wilbysuffolk (talk) 02:42, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mitolazone bas.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Environmentalist and Historian (notify | contribs | uploads).

Inaccurate, disputed drawing  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:04, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Structurally incorrect per Metolazone article on the topic (stray H on one of the central N as noted in dispute-tag on article page) and drawn with possibly non-standard (or at least subpar) bonding (the rings would be better as aromatic not specific single and double and the sulfone should not be double). DMacks (talk) 08:43, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per above. If incorrect you need to delete it of course. Wilbysuffolk (talk) 02:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:2acetyl1pyrroline bas.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Environmentalist and Historian (notify | contribs | uploads).

Inaccurate, disputed drawing  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:05, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. This structure as drawn is chemically impossible. DMacks (talk) 08:40, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per above/nom. Why have a structure which is impossible to make. Wilbysuffolk (talk) 02:44, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Methocarbamol ball and stick.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Environmentalist and Historian (notify | contribs | uploads).

Inaccurate, disputed drawing  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:05, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Definitely low quality bonding form, per tag on image-page. I think the "missing" H may be present and just hidden behind its attached C, but that simply proves that this is a poor representation of the topic (an altered perspective would illustrate the correct the bonding clearly). DMacks (talk) 08:45, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per above & Nom. Wilbysuffolk (talk) 02:54, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:07, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Traumatic Acid.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Environmentalist and Historian (notify | contribs | uploads).

Inaccurate, disputed drawing  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:06, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Traumatic acid is the article on the subject--the actual compound would have both red spheres attached to the same gray sphere at each end, not adjacent. DMacks (talk) 08:38, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wrong so delete. You can not have an inacurate drawing on wikipedia as that is giving false info to people. Wilbysuffolk (talk) 02:55, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.