Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 December 6

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. — ξ^xplicit 02:38, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Office 2008.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

• In my opinion (for every sentence which follows): this non-free image is not "a screenshot" (singular). It is described by the uploader as a "combination of screenshots" (8 of them). It is laid out so as to be able to fight WP:NFCC minimalization on the grounds of "can't see or read anything if reduced" below 1280x1200, which exceeds NFCC smallest-possible-usable-size mandates by between 10x and 15x pixels. It does not meet Microsoft's definition of "a screenshot", ({{Non-free Microsoft screenshot}} and links) or meet Microsoft's prohibition against "combining" or "modifying" screenshots. It does not meet our definition of "a screenshot" (singular) either. If the various components of Office are important enough to be shown visually with accompanying discussion, they should be separate screenshots. Note: it is conceivable that users of Office on very large screens, or on 2-screen or 3-screen systems could lay out several simultaneous side-by-side windows and take a screenshot, but this is not a true example of that. IMHO it is visual WP:SYNTH, which, though RS sometimes do it, we typically do not. It is replaceable by a small number of much smaller non-free screenshots which comply with Microsoft's and our policies and guidelines, to communicate the same information. If this has been discussed elsewhere, point me there. Lexein (talk) 19:24, 6 December 2012 (UTC) Removed --Lexein (talk) 20:35, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:11, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.