Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on February 21, 2021.

Heat emission

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Disambiguate. signed, Rosguill talk 01:11, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to also refer to Thermal radiation and Heat transfer, not sure how the best way to handle this is - I'm not the most familiar with science. Hog Farm Talk 22:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Goin' Back to the Bridge

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:50, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target or elsewhere on WP. No assistance to navigation. Richhoncho (talk) 20:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Scoutmaster Robbie

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:49, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is yet another disguise used by Robbie Rotten in "Lazy Scouts," even though it's called "Scotty the Scoutmaster." It's kinda ambiguous as well, so maybe delete it, or if we keep it, retarget it to List of LazyTown episodes#ep10. See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 12#Scotty the Scoutmaster. Regards, SONIC678 17:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 20:12, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Suffragists

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Suffrage and hatnote, which seems to be where we landed after the relist. -- Tavix (talk) 19:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should Suffragist and Suffragists be made disambiguation pages? They both link to different articles, and both terms could be used (more widely) to refer to Women's suffrage, or (more specifically) to the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (but absolutely not the suffragettes). Bangalamania (talk) 15:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Suffragist (singular) was not tagged, I've just corrected that. A draft of the disambiguation page would also be useful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 20:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kekekekeke

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to LOL#Related. Nominally no consensus between retarget and delete. signed, Rosguill talk 01:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Explained better at LOL#Related. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 20:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rottenella

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:48, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a one-time character from "Dancing Duel," who used to have an article for over a day in January 2010 before that was turned into a redirect. She wasn't mentioned at the target during that time, so I don't really know if we should keep this lying around. However, if it's kept, the most suitable target I can think of would be List of LazyTown episodes#ep32, where she's mentioned, though not by name. Regards, SONIC678 07:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 19:55, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LazyTown Mayors

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now this is just misleading. The redirect implies there were multiple mayor characters in LazyTown, but there is only one. Dominicmgm (talk) 23:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 19:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Selena (American pop singer)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Selena Gomez is not known mononymously, so it is not plausible for someone to search for her in this fashion, especially with double or triple disambiguation. -- Tavix (talk) 19:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Anal people

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Anal due to the lack of consensus on whether there is a primary topic. -- Tavix (talk) 19:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page Anal person redirects to Anal retentiveness, but the plural form redirects to this completely different article. Keep or retarget? Colgatepony234 (talk) 20:06, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Right, fixed that. Mdewman6 (talk) 18:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 17:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relist to add Anal person, since the discussion concerns both redirects.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix (talk) 18:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Onlyinclude

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence this term has any connection to the target, or even exists. UnitedStatesian (talk) 13:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Alice Wiegand

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, nor anywhere else on Wikipedia. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:27, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stuart West (Wikimedia)

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. I could not find any Wikimedia-related Stuart West anywhere else on Wikipedia either. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 12:07, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Jugend

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Without consensus that the magazine is the primary topic, disambiguation is preferable. -- Tavix (talk) 18:38, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has redirected to Jugend (magazine) for 10 years. Recently changed to redirect to Youth as a German to English redirect. I propose moving the magazine to the title since there is no other article and no need for disambiguation. No need for a word translation redirect either. MB 04:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thryduulf, I am proposing a move but that can be done without discussion if the redirect is deleted. I thought the more significant issue was should Jugend redirect to Youth. MB 15:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Even if we don't disambiguate, just redirecting it to a magazine article with only a few that are interested about the topic (i.e. Architects etc.) is not really a great idea. I say either stick with the current redirect to "Youth" as a translation or disambiguate it. PyroFloe (talk) 06:04, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Misspellings of Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Procedural keep. Most participants agree that this nomination is basically a WP:TRAINWRECK, and that it would be preferable to renominate these redirects in small batches so they can be sorted out in a much easier way. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 01:44, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I counted 45 misspelling redirects to this page that do not drop one of the morphemes (e.g. Supercali), or about 5.49 bits of entropy. Does a 34-letter-long word (about 159.81 bits of entropy) really warrant this many misspelling redirects? According to PVS (sample of 9 redirects) the main page has garnered a fairly steady 1693 PVS d-1, while I estimate around 1.8 PVS d-1 among all these redirects. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 06:46, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nikolaus von Wacken

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:20, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unless there is an appropriate local target for this page. Sending readers to non-English content is not helpful. Additionally, the plain {{soft redirect}} template is not used in the mainspace (along the lines of the sentiment expressed at WP:SOFTSP). See here for precedents. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 05:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If it is desirable to add a link to the German language content Template:Interlanguage link should be used, rather than a redirect. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:45, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Adsf

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to the disambiguation page at ADSF. I have no idea why this was relisted when there was a clear consensus for disambiguation. Thryduulf (talk) 17:20, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target, but used with different meanings at Resistin, Shannon Lucid, Denver's Art District on Santa Fe, DO-212, and more. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not really sure why this was relisted - the nom statment says it is ambiguous and all three people who've commented on this discussion are in favour of disambiguation, with one having written a DAB page. I thought that we had a consensus to disambiguate? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Boah

[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 18:35, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is also a tribe with this name mentioned at Barrobo District. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.