Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Pascack
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the case of suspected sockpuppetry. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page. All edits should go to the talk page of this case. If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to open a new case of sockpuppetry of the same user, read this for detailed instructions.
All blocked indef: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pascack
User:Pascack[edit]
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
Pascack (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
The following a really obvious sockpuppets, per [1]. It's just a question of whom, though it seems pretty obvious to me it's Pascock:
- Columbia05 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Sportsnationman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Aepi99 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Conine92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Hoosier95 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- 192.234.99.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- 68.175.17.193 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) - not the same reverse WHOIS, but I've noted they're not always perfect (I once edited from a Penn State University IP, that stated as much right in the WHOIS, but also said I was in California). Likely a different user though.
Also likely:
- Joeidaho (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
The Evil Spartan 23:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Evidence
- [2] 'nough said? I count 21RR.
- [3] Ditto.
- [4]
- [5].
- Please note I've also filed a report on this user's adversaries. As said there, I recommend a hefty block for both of them, given the heavy 3RR, lame edit warring going on. There have been multiple reports at ANI, none of which I feel like digging up, as these reverts say enough. The Evil Spartan 23:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- This is unacceptable. Good to see that they were all punished accordingly. It was very annoying seeing Pascack using all those socks spark controversy. He deserved this Soxrock 17:50, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Conclusions
Hidden category: