Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 August 16

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 16

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. Primefac (talk) 00:40, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Social titles with Template:Personal names.
Mere taxonomic assumption. There seems to be space enough to keep this together in one template. Chicbyaccident (talk) 23:56, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose There doesn't seem to be any reason for merging two templates on different things just because they are vaguely related. A name is not a title, and a title is not a name. Robminchin (talk) 00:50, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. To answer the question posed regarding "why not redirect", it was answered in the subsequent post; Logic is a subproject, not a WikiProject proper, and so to imply that it is one is incorrect. When a WikiProject gets converted into a subproject/task force there is no need to keep the old templates, just replace and delete. Primefac (talk) 00:44, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant with {{WikiProject Philosophy|logic=yes}} per Wikipedia:WikiProject Logic/Templates#Project pages. I've replaced the few instances where it was actually used. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:49, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. REFUND is available if and when the redirects are converted into useful articles and there is enough there to merit a template. Primefac (talk) 00:50, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

None of the listed Yoko Tsuno albums or side characters has an independent article on the English Wikipedia, therefore this navbox is entirely useless, save for Vinea. — JFG talk 14:03, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would qualify, just not enough energy to get on it right now. Some of the Vineans' futuristic tech was really prescient of Mr. Leloup, writing in the 1970s about biostasis, drones, mind uploading, maglev trains in tunnels, etc. He inspired many French scientists of today! — JFG talk 17:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it looks like a Yoko Tsuno fan created this series of articles circa 2006. Pity they were not sourced or improved since. I suppose Yoko is much less known than Tintin in the Anglosphere. — JFG talk 17:53, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Frédérick Lacasse: As the creator of several articles back in the early days, and if you're still around, do you have an opinion on what should be done? — JFG talk 23:57, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 August 27. Primefac (talk) 01:12, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:51, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This singer's navigational template consists of four links: the artist's article and three albums that redirect back to the artist's article. Therefore, it does not navigate anywhere and is not needed. Aspects (talk) 00:17, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).