Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Furry

	Furry Project‑class
WikiProject Furry is within the scope of WikiProject Furry, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to furry fandom. For more information, visit the project page.FurryWikipedia:WikiProject FurryTemplate:WikiProject Furryfurry articles Project This page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Archives

Archive 1 (July 2007 - July 2008) * Archive 2 (August 2008 - October 2013)

Hello, I'm Just Tidying Up. I'm commenting because I recently performed a major rewrite and expansion of Stalking Cat, and I am interested to increase further expansion and improvement of the article, with other editors. We especially need help finding more sources. There is also a task list, defining areas that need improvement. If you are interested to learn more about this topic, please join us at the rewrite discussion. Thank you. Just Tidying Up (talk) 16:36, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing the Furry Barnstar. Jerm (talk) 19:47, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The "Furry fandom" book was about to be deleted due to an RFC deleting the Book namespace. I've saved it and its discussion for those interested in future printing or other use. GreenReaper (talk) 22:44, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The articles Yiff and Fursona have like zero images. Which is odd because fursona is listed at top importance for this WikiProject.

But at the same time I’m not gonna lie I’m a little scared what images people are gonna put on theses articles. Like someone posted porn to the Yiff article and I reverted it.

What do you guys think? Do you have any images for theses? Or any ideas?CycoMa (talk) 18:11, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CycoMa, Refer to WP:NSFW in the case of Yiff. The leading image on Furry fandom is a Commons image and can be reused for Fursona. Jalen Folf (talk) 19:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Furry convention has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've been trying to find ways to improve Ozy and Millie via finding secondary/tertiary sources, editing paragraphs, etc. But I noticed on the article's talkpage that the last responsive interaction regarding the article which doesn't involve bots was all the way in January of 2010. Considering this, it would be logical to assume that the article hasn't received much attention from editors, and I certainly can't fix an entire article bit-by-bit by myself. What I'm basically saying is: I need assistance in getting Ozy and Millie to Good Article status, for I'm but a novice wikipedian.

​-Keagen J. Cole ​🐾 (talk) 15:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to help, but a lot of the work here is finding independent analysis of the comic that doesn't come from blogs, user generated websites, or otherwise. It's in a pretty sad state right now, and it may be better to make a copy in userspace to make some heavy edits. I've done so here for convenience. Reconrabbit 19:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]