User talk:Dcljr/LC

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search

For the most part the division of classes chosen by the LOC does not serve our purposes well. Generally it chooses sub-classes based on countries, it would seem to work better for us if an article can be cross referenced by a country category from D, E or F, and one or more codes from this class K.

A quick evaluation suggests that only KB, for ecclesiastical law, and KZ, for international law, are likely to be retained.

This page proposes how the law category may be sub-divided. When this has been grasped linking these subdivisions to coded categories is only a mechanical exercise.

Subdivisions of law

[edit]

General group

[edit]
  • Jurisprudence
    • History of law
    • Philosophy of law
    • Historical legal systems
      • Common law
      • Civil law
  • Administration of justice
    • Courts
    • Judges
    • Lawyers
  • Statutes
  • Case law
    • Supreme courts
    • Appelate courts
    • Trial courts
  • Constitutional law

Government group

[edit]
  • Administrative law
    • Government administration
  • Military law
    • Emergency measures
  • Financial administration
    • Taxation law
    • Fiscal policy

Benefits group

[edit]
  • Social legislation
    • Environmental law
    • Labour law
    • Social insurance
    • Welfare
    • Education
    • Science and the arts
  • Public health law
    • Medical legislation
    • Food and medical drugs
    • Product safety
    • Alcohol, Tobacco and recreational drugs
    • Veterinary law

Personal group

[edit]
  • Law of persons
    • Family law
    • Succession and inheritance
  • Private law
    • Arbitration and mediation
  • Obligations
    • Torts
    • Personal contracts

Property group

[edit]
  • Property
    • Ownership
    • Real estate
    • Corporations
    • Intellectual property law
      • Copyright law
      • Patent law
      • Trademark law
  • Commercial law
    • Commercial Contracts
    • Insurance law
    • Banking
    • Regulation of industry
    • Carriage of goods
    • Bankruptcy

Criminal group

[edit]
  • Criminal law
    • Compensation of victims

Interjurisdictional group

[edit]
  • International law
  • Comparative law
    • Conflict of laws
  • Maritime law

DK5 main categories of law

[edit]

This is how the DK5 system divides the law top-level category:

  • 34. Law, justice and legislation (top-level category)
  • 34.1 International law
  • 34.2 Constitutional and administrative law
  • 34.3 Criminal law and criminology
  • 34.4 Military law
  • 34.5 Civil/private law
  • 34.6 Statutes, acts, regulations, Royal decrees, departmental orders, circulations etc. (collections and standalones)
  • 34.7 Administration of justice
  • 34.8 Roman law
  • 34.9 Canonical, Jewish and Islamic law

These categories are subdivided in the DK5 system, and some subdivision will probably be needed here as well. This is just a suggestion for primary division - more top-level entries can be made, or some entries can be split (the DK5 decimal classification system is limited to 10 entries per sub-level, but the LOC system is not). Christian S 12:56, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Having 26 subdivisions available is certainly an advantage for LOC. The similarities between DK5 and Dewey on this topic are notable; one was clearly influenced by the other. Eclecticology 09:11, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Looking at these propositions, and the general list of Dewey Decimal categories of law:

  • 340 Law
  • 341 International law
  • 342 Constitutional and administrative law
  • 343 Military, tax, trade, industrial law
  • 344 Social, labor, welfare and related law
  • 345 Criminal law
  • 346 Private law
  • 347 Civil procedure and courts
  • 348 Law (statutes), regulations, cases
  • 349 Law of specific jurisdictions and areas

It seems that the most appropriate way to create a category system would be (Freely amend as necessary):

  • LC-K (this would include discourses on justice and law in general, and philosophical works)
    • International Law (includes Maritime Law)
      • Statutes (This might cross-link to historical bi/multi-lateral documents. It probably would have multi-lateral statutes, especially UN-related ones as a separate undercategory)
      • Courts (The World Court and the new International Criminal Court founding documents?)
      • Case law (Cases in the above two courts)
    • Constitutional Law
      • Statutes (Cross-link to Constitutional Documents)
      • Courts (Supreme Court Documents around the world. Organized by nation.)
      • Case law (Supreme Court results go here. Organized by nation.)
    • Administrative Law
      • Statutes
      • Courts (?)
      • Case law
    • Criminal Law
      • Statutes (Many many of these. Probably just link to online repositories, except for sample texts like the Super-DMCA sample legislation)
      • Courts (Presumably local, state, and low-level federal courts)
      • Case law
    • Military Law
      • Statutes
      • Courts (?)
      • Case law
    • Tax Law
      • Statutes (Link to IRS Tax Code?)
      • Courts (?)
      • Case law (Scientology cases, among others...)
    • Commercial/Corporate/Industrial Law
      • Statutes
      • Case law
    • Intellectual Property Law
      • Statutes
      • Case law
    • Social Laws
      • Statutes
      • Courts (?)
      • Case law
    • Private/Family Law
      • Statutes
      • Courts (?)
      • Case law
    • Historical Law Systems
      • Roman Law
      • English Law (e.g. Magna Carta)
      • French Law (e.g. Louisiana-type law)
      • Canonical Law (Christian?)
      • Jewish Law
      • Islamic Law

Or something along those lines... -- Pipian 20:49, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)

This looks like a good suggestion. "Canonical Law" should perhaps be renamed "Christian Law", as I believe this is what it means (correct me if I'm wrong). As to "Intellectual Property Law" vs. "Copyright Law" I don't know which name is best. Christian S 15:15, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
I hesitated to callit Christian Law as I wasn't sure that it was what it's known to be called. I chose Intellectual Property instead of Copyright to allow a greater amount of cases to be understood to be under that category (Trademarks, Patents) -- Pipian
Canonical Law is what is used in Danish, but, as English is only my second language, I'm not sure what the correct english term is - it could be either for all I know. Intellectual Property is fine with me. Christian S 17:30, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Thanks to both of you for your suggestions. The English is usually "canon law" rather than "canonical law"; it broadly co-incides with "ecclesiastical law". One could also say "church law". This is the one area where I plan to retain the KB that is used by LOC. Eclecticology 09:11, 26 Jun 2004 (UTC)

This category is reserved for material related to software engineering, computer programs and source code. Ideas about how these should be categorized are welcome. Eclecticology 23:14, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Here are some possible categorisations, none seem perfect as there is overlap.

By business field:

  • Management
  • Banking
  • Medical
  • Engineering
  • Scientific
  • Avionics
  • Ecommerce

By technology (part-taken from Reliable Software Technologies Lecture Notes):

  • Safety and Security - encryption, redundancy, hot-cold backups
  • Verification and Validation
  • Distributed Systems - multiple machines, networks
  • Real-Time Systems - time critical, time-budgetted
  • Compilers and Tools
  • Interfacing languages - Ada-C Ada-Java for example

-Wikibob 21:47, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Possible categorization for discussion

[edit]

How's this idea? I'll leave it here for a while for people to make comments, note any major subjects I've missed, and so on. I'm assuming this category is meant for both source code (Wikisource:Source code) and writing about programming and software design. As it stands right now, this proposed categorization has a pronounced bias toward the art of programming, as opposed to management or UI design or tutorials on specific software; see below for a list of topics for which I realize I've left little room.

Notice that I didn't try to cover "medical algorithms" or "avionics algorithms" or "banking algorithms," since as far as I'm concerned those labels are meaningless. Algorithms to fuzzy-match DNA sequences will be found under "fuzzy string searching" in -TBO; path-planning algorithms will be found under -TBL; and compound-interest formulas will be found under -TBG.

In compiling this categorization, I've looked at Wikipedia:List of algorithms and Wikisource:Source code.

LC-TB  Computer Science and Software Engineering
  -TBA  Comparative programming paradigms (OO, declarative, constraint-based)
  -TBB  Comparative programming methodologies (Extreme Programming, team organization, literate programming, verification)
  -TBC  Comparative programming languages (C, Java, Lisp)
  -TBD  Comparative miscellany (HCI, buffer overflow prevention)
     E
  -TBF  Software tools (wc, diff, indent)
  -TBG  General idioms and practice programs (HAKMEM, "Hello world")
  -TBH  Ciphers, cryptosystems, and hashes (TEA, RC4, MD5, CRC32)
  -TBI  Compression algorithms (JPEG, gzip, MP3)
  -TBJ  Graph algorithms (Dijkstra, Ford, A*)
  -TBK  Number theory and discrete numeric algorithms (Euclid, primality testing, calculate pi)
  -TBL  Optimization algorithms (simplex, genetic algorithms, TSP)
  -TBM  General numeric algorithms (Newton-Raphson, matrix multiply, DSP)
  -TBN  Probabilistic algorithms (Markov chains, Bayesian filters)
  -TBO  Searching and sorting (KMP, Quicksort)
  -TBP  Highly parallel computing algorithms
  -TBQ  Quantum computing algorithms
  -TBR  Distributed computing algorithms
     S
  -TBT  Parsing (regular expressions, LALR)
  -TBU  Compiler design and implementation (optimization, register assignment, stack management)
  -TBV  2D computational geometry and image processing (Canny edge detection, Bresenham's algorithm)
  -TBW  3D and higher-dimensional computational geometry (ray tracing, computer vision)
     X
  -TBY  Web programming (HTML, Javascript, CSS)
  -TBZ  TCP/IP and network programming (ping, Web proxy, sendmail)

Deficiencies:

  • Security idioms (buffer overflow prevention, file permissions) (could go in -TBD)
  • Category -TBF is just thrown in there as a repository for "textutils" and "binutils" that don't implement any specific well-known algorithm (e.g., wc). Is it even worth having this subcat? I, personally, would like to have a repository for the GNU sources (and others) as user-friendly as Wikisource, but I'm not sure the copyright mess would allow many existing tools to be added verbatim; someone would have to reimplement each GNU tool under the GFDL.
  • Similarly, -TBG is only there for historical reasons (Case conversion, Hello world, Easter day, Xor swap algorithm).
  • Tutorials on specific products and tools can go in -TBB or -TBD, but that's pretty vague.
  • Information on the history of computing has to go in -TBD also.
  • User interface design (could go in -TBD).
  • Testing and formal verification (could go in -TBB).
  • Database programming (the construction of interesting SQL queries, for example).
  • Operating-system programming (file systems, thread libraries).
  • Memory management algorithms (implementing malloc and free).
  • Garbage collection algorithms.
See also Wikisource talk:Source code. Perhaps Wikibooks would be a more appropriate source code repository; in addition, it might encourage people to write more explanation about the source code and how it works. One obvious disadvantage: Newcomers to Wikimedia will almost certainly try to find source code on Wikisource. --Quuxplusone 17:18, 26 July 2005 (UTC)Reply