Steward requests/Permissions/2012-02

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in February 2012, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

CustodieMinori@ro.wikibooks

As there is no active Bureaucrat for Romanian Wikimanuals, I kindly ask you to help me to become administrator in http://ro.wikibooks.org/. I raised this request several weeks ago here: http://ro.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikimanuale:Cafenea#A.C8.99_dori_s.C4.83_contactez_un_administrator but seems that all previous administrators are not active anymore. Big thanks. CustodieMinori 07:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Done for three months till 3 May 2012. Ruslik 12:47, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Maksat@ky.wikipedia.org

Hello my friends. I ask you to extend me adminship on ky.wikipedia.org. Even though there hasn't been much traffic lately, this is going to change soon, when I have more time. Thank You. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Maksat (talk)

But you have never been an administrator on this wiki? Ruslik 12:53, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Declined after a week. He seems just to be copy-pasting Zylbath@ndswikt request above, without paying attention if what it says actually correlates with facts. es:Magister Mathematicae 16:09, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

I also reverted this malformed bureaucrat request, which is obviously declined. PeterSymonds (talk) 19:43, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

خَرگوش@ks.wikipedia

Request for extension of admin rights. Unfortunately there is still no community at ks.wikipedia other than myself. I will be happy to face an election as soon as community exists. Until then I would be prefer to maintain admin privilege for basic site maintenance purpose. Thank you Sirs. --خَرگوش 22:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Please provide a link in a prominent place (like Village Pump) on kswiki asking for an extension. --FiliP ██ 08:43, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done since there is no update of progress. Please open another request when you come back. Bencmq 14:44, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Simbu123@as.wikipedia.org

As the Assamese Wikipedia is growing with an infusion of new editors, increased activity and expanding scope, we require more personnel with administrative access to meet the needs of an expanding community and Wikipedia. The community has held a vote to give as:user:Simbu123 administrator access. The voting began on February 05, 2012 and concluded on February 12, 2012 with 12 YES and 0 NO votes. I request that as:user:Simbu123 be given administrator access. Thanks. Chaipau 01:43, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Done, and since the community size is sufficiently large, this is a permanent appointment. PeterSymonds (talk) 01:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Igriks@vep.wikipedia

Hello. This Wiki opened some days ago, but it has no administrators. I think stewards, who read it, can give admin flag for user Igriks. He speaks Vepsian as native, and he has knowledge of Wikimedia rules. Thank you--Tamara Ustinova 15:11, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Please have the user to post a request for adminship in vep:Vikipedii:Kund. We will review the consensus after a week and if so promote the user. Thanks for your understanding. Best regards. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 16:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

 On hold until 15 February 2012 as a discussion is started here. Trijnstel 22:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Done for three months till 15.05.2012. Ruslik 08:06, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

seb_az86556@rmy.project

In order for this to be implemented as accepted by SPQRobin, somebody needs a temporary sysop-flag. Since I'm the one who made the proposal, I'm willing to volunteer. 1 day should do. Thanks. Seb az86556 (talk) 02:56, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

 Granted to expire on 2012-02-19. -- Avi (talk) 03:24, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Done Removed. Thank you for your work! -- Avi (talk) 03:13, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

තඹරු විජේසේකර@siwikipedia

Community vote had been completed by 04:21, 22 February 2012 as the vote was closed by user:බිඟුවා who is the administrator proposed the candidate. The result had been declared by user:බිඟුවා as 7/6/0. Yet there are concerns by other users and administrators. [1] and [2]. In the second reference, which is the candidate's user page the administrator who proposed the candidate and closed the vote suggests that the vote tally should be 6/4/0. In the first reference, another administrator suggests that the tally should be 5/4/0. The dispute is about accounts of certain voters which had been made minutes before they have voted and/or certain voters who have had minimal interaction with the Wikipedia and abstained from Wikipedia for a long time and appeared just for voting. The administrator user:බිඟුවා had provided the option to the candidate to forward the result to Meta. Neither the candidate nor the administrator user:බිඟුවා had done this up to this moment and the issue is in a stalemate position. Considering the above, your ruling and decision is sought please. ---ශ්වෙත (talk) 06:24, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

I was just creating the req & got conflict with your edit. Thank you ශ්වෙත you have done it. -- බිඟුවා ^{සාකච්ඡාව} 06:41, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello. I suppose that there is no local requirement for voting to these elections. You should probably set up some rules to prevent such things to happend. However, I've tried to find out what's wrong with votes, and those that come from accounts that have just been created won't be counted. Here is the result of my investigation :

• The following contributors have supported, and there is no doubt they come from the community : බිඟුවා, Budhajeewa, උපුල්, අනංගයා
• Same for the following opponents : සමන්, ශ්වෙත, Singhalawap, Cwijayakoon
• සෝරෝ has only six contributions, even if his account was created on July 2010
• Sashen, පද්මා හතරසිංහ, Tailung81 and සරත් have been created the day they voted

Accounts were created to vote, but on both sides. Anyway, if we don't count them we are at 4/4 and if we count all votes we are at 7/6. Both ways there is clearly no consensus to give this user sysop access right now. Sorry, -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 09:06, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for helping us. ---ශ්වෙත (talk) 09:14, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Mohau@nsowikipedia

Please extend my adminship. Thanks, Mohau (talk) 11:18, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Please make a local announcement on your local village pump or request for adminship page. Thanks. Bencmq (talk) 12:06, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Not done Please open another request when you've posted the notification and there are no objections after a few days.

rahuldeshmukh101@mr.wikisource.org Marathi wiki source

As I am in process of setting up the newly granted portal of Marathi wiki source . For setup and maintenance I request you to please grant me the temporary Bureaucrat access to setup the portal. Allocate the Bot flags etc. Once the portal is operational we will ask community to select regular one. I am already admin on mr.wikipedia . Thanks --Rahuldeshmukh101 04:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

We do not usually grant temporay bureaucrat access. Ruslik 17:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

As per Ruslik. If there is a need to grant a bot or admin flag, please request it on Meta. -- Avi 17:51, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

mvkulkarni23@mr.wikisource.org

As I am in process of setting up the newly granted portal of Marathi wiki source. For setup and maintenance I request you to please grant me the temporary Bureaucrat flag which is needed to setup the portal. I am already admin on mr.wikipedia . Need the access for 6 months, so that by that time the portal and community will also develop and we can select regular admin. Thanks mvkulkarni23 23:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Same as above. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 17:49, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

As per Quentin. If there is a need to grant a bot or admin flag, please request it on Meta. -- Avi 17:51, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Bernard@eswiki

Bernard has been approved as a checkuser, but this request will have to remain on hold until the identification is confirmed. Savh^ñ 06:23, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

 On hold - Voting has been reopened. Please poke us when the vote closes again. Thanks. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 20:37, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

It has been closed again now мιѕѕ мαηzαηα (let's talk) 06:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

So again  On hold till identification is received :) —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 13:20, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 18:49, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Montgomery@eswiki

This user has been approved as a checkuser, but this request will have to remain on hold until the identification is confirmed. Regards, Nixón 21:13, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

 On hold pending identification. Trijnstel 21:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:18, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Jameslwoodward@commonswiki

Voting will be closed the next day and the support and community trust of James is clear. What we need is identification from him--Morning Sunshine 16:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

 On hold - Jameslwoodward is already identified. We may set the flag after a bureaucrat closes the vote and tells us to go ahead. Thanks. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 16:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Vote closed. Go right ahead. --99of9 11:08, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. Will arange the rest asap. Trijnstel 11:20, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Rastrojo@eswiki

User has been elected CU at eswiki, however, the request will have to be on hold until identification is recieved. Greetings. Jcaraballo 21:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

 On hold pending identification. Trijnstel 21:57, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 00:39, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Edmenb@eswiki

User has been elected CU at eswiki, however, the request will have to be on hold until identification is recieved. Greetings.--Jcaraballo 17:41, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

 On hold pending identification. Trijnstel 20:27, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 00:41, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Jagro@cs.wikipedia

Jagro has enough community support to be given checkuser access (pre-agreed threshold of at least 25 support votes and at least 4:1 support:oppose ratio has been reached). Tchoř 01:28, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

•  On hold Until identified to the foundation. -- Avi 04:34, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

• I confirmed my identity via e-mail. — Jagro 13:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 14:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Postrach@cs.wikipedia

Postrach has enough community support to be given checkuser access (pre-agreed threshold of at least 25 support votes and at least 4:1 support:oppose ratio has been reached). Tchoř 01:28, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

•  On hold Until identified to the foundation. -- Avi 04:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
  • confirmed Jalexander (talk) 18:22, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
    • Done - Right granted. -Barras talk 18:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Arkanosis@fr.wikipedia.org

The Arbitration Comitee of Wikipedia in French, on behalf of which I'm writting, has decided to grant oversight access to Arkanosis. He's not yet identified by the Foundation (but has been notified to do so). Thanks in advance, --Gede 01:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. I've sent a mail to secure-info. Best regards — Arkanosis ^✉ 10:30, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm identified — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:27, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. --Mercy 11:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! — Arkanosis ^✉ 11:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Scuzzer@sv.wikipedia

Please remove the administrator rights. --MagnusA 08:09, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. --Mercy 08:21, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Phisite@th.wikipedia

According to the local policy of Arbitration, the ArbCom have rights to revoke administrator rights due to inactivity (have less than 50 edits over 1 year period before removal, as stated in the policy) Phisite, who has been inactive since 2007, has been notified here but no response has been given. I, as the ArbCom clerk, hereby request on behalf of the ArbCom to have this user's sysop rights removed. Regards, --G(x) 10:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. I have removed the sysop right. Do you want the bureaucrat right removed too? — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 10:57, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Please also remove the Bureaucrat rights as well. This is to ensure that there will be no misuse of tools if the account has been compromised, which is also the original proposal apart from inactivity. If he wants his right back, he may ask the existing, active Bureaucrat to reassign his rights. Thanks. --G(x) 11:05, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Done — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 11:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

ไร้สติ@th.wikipedia

According to the local policy of Arbitration, the ArbCom have rights to revoke administrator rights due to inactivity (have less than 50 edits over 1 year period before removal, as stated in the policy) Phisite, who has been inactive since 2008, has been notified here but no response has been given. I, as the ArbCom clerk, hereby request on behalf of the ArbCom to have this user's sysop rights removed. Regards, --G(x) 10:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. I have removed the sysop right. Do you want the bureaucrat right removed too? — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 10:57, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Please also remove the Bureaucrat rights as well. This is to ensure that there will be no misuse of tools if the account has been compromised, which is also the original proposal apart from inactivity. If he wants his right back, he may ask the existing, active Bureaucrat to reassign his rights. Thanks. --G(x) 11:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Done — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 11:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Kie@th.wikipedia

According to the local policy of Arbitration, the ArbCom have rights to revoke administrator rights due to inactivity (have less than 50 edits over 1 year period before removal, as stated in the policy) Phisite, who has been inactive since 2009, has been notified here but no response has been given. I, as the ArbCom clerk, hereby request on behalf of the ArbCom to have this user's sysop rights removed. Regards, --G(x) 10:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. I have removed the sysop right. Do you want the bureaucrat right removed too? — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 10:57, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Please also remove the Bureaucrat rights as well. This is to ensure that there will be no misuse of tools if the account has been compromised, which is also the original proposal apart from inactivity. If he wants his right back, he may ask the existing, active Bureaucrat to reassign his rights. Thanks. --G(x) 11:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Done — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 11:10, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Rojypala@ml.wikipedia

Rojypala wants to resign from his sysop role due to some personal issues. His confirmation can find here and here. Please process his request, thank you --Kiran Gopi 12:09, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Done, please thank him for his contribution to the Project. Bencmq 12:48, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you--Rojypala 12:50, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Filnik@commonswiki

Thanks in advance. Trijnstel 22:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:19, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Skyluke@itwiki

--Vituzzu 22:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 22:48, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Actually, Skyluke suppressed a redirect (for which delete rights are needed, i.e. being a sysop) on the 31st Oct 2011, just more than 4 months ago. it.wiki policy requires 6 months of sysop inactiviy, so I do not think this request of removal of permission is correct. I just posted the same message on Vituzzu's talk page. --Mark91 10:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Waiting for an answer is always a good practice... 1) suppressredirect is completely unrelated with delete right 2) Skyluke has been previously contacted by me 3) most of users grumbled at your interpretation in the past months --Vituzzu 11:30, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

JamAKiska@en.wikisource

Your remarks, etc. --Hesperian 00:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Done--Vituzzu 00:45, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Nonopoly@frwikipedia

Could you please remove sysop frome my acount ? Regards Nonopoly 17:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

 On hold seems a ragequit to me, let's wait some hours. --Vituzzu 17:12, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Rage quit or not, it'not you to decide. Please do it as fast as possible. I need it. Nonopoly 17:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Done courtesy is always the key. --Vituzzu 17:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Silver Spoon@commons

Thanx in advance - Silver Spoon 16:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Done thank you for your service! --Vituzzu 17:03, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Sobreira@gl.wikipedia

This user did not perform any administrator task for a 3-year time period. Our local policy watches this possibility as a reason to revoke sysop status after a poll. Regards. --Toliño ^{Fala aquí comigo} 14:41, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Feito/Done. «A votación durará 15 días e o resultado determinarase por maioría simple. Tanto se a petición é rexeitada como aceptada, arquivarase; se é aceptada, un burócrata retiraralle os privilexios.» — There's simple majority at the desysop poll. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 15:02, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Bayo@frwiki

Six month inactivity. Thanks. --Elfix 20:44, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Nakor@frwiki

Please remove all flags I have on fr.wikipedia Nakor 12:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Done thanks for your service. Matanya 12:12, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Lavallen2@svwikipedia

Because of some MediaWiki updates, my adminbot has become obsolete. Sysopbit can be removed. -- Lavallen 07:48, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Done Matanya 07:50, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

stv@plwiki

-sysop please. --stv # 23:54, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your service and hope you will continue in the project! --Jyothis 23:58, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

poco_a_poco@es.wikipedia

It looks that I lack of support among some admin colleagues. Thus, I would like to ask you to remove my bureaucrat and admin flags. Thanks and best regards --Poco a poco 22:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

 On hold--Vituzzu 22:09, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Done--Vituzzu 23:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

MF-Warburg@mhrwiki

Please remove my importer status there, it's not needed anymore. --MF-W 19:56, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Done, thank you. Matanya 19:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

several@testwiki

User:Devunt closed that request and removed the admin bits due to inactivity, but forgot to request the removed of crat bits, now done! a×p_de^Hello! 15:57, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Javier Carro@eswiki

This user has been inactive for 2 years now so, according to this policy, his sysop and bureaucrat flags have to be removed. Thanks, — Pólux (σ) 06:30, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. es:Magister Mathematicae 06:34, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Watcharakorn@thwiki

I confirm my request for the removal of my access as sysop and bureaucrat from Thai Wikipedia. I don't have the time to contribute anymore. --Watcharakorn 14:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Done Matanya 14:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Watcharakorn@thwiktionary

Please remove my sysop rights on Thai Wiktionary. --Watcharakorn 14:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Done thanks for your work. Matanya 14:59, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Watcharakorn@thwikibooks

Please remove my sysop rights on Thai Wikibooks. --Watcharakorn 14:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Done thanks for your work. Matanya 14:59, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Several@cywiki

This user has been inactive for 3 years now according to his last contribution page. His sysop flag have to be removed. Diolch. Thanks, Llywelyn2000 08:31, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Done this removal after reviewing your local discussion.--Jusjih 09:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

This user has been inactive for 3 years now (since December 2008) according to his last contribution page. His sysop and Bureaucrat flags have to be removed. Diolch. Thanks, Llywelyn2000 08:31, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Done removing both inactive flags.--Jusjih 09:43, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

several@is.wikipedia

The Icelandic Wikipedia has an inactivity policy for it´s admins and bureaucrats. Admins and bureaucrats who have not made any edits for one year are notified on their talk pages. If they don´t respond within one month or don´t express any interest in keeping their rights, they will lose them.

All of the users mentioned above where notified on their talk pages at 16th January 2012. StalfurPDA is an known alternative account of is:user:Stalfur, so I notified Stalfur instead. Stalfur is the only user that responded and he agreed with removing StalfurPDA´s rights. Since one month has passed from the notifacation, I am requesting removal of both their admin and bureaucrat rights.--Snaevar (talk) 11:13, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Done I just removed the bureaucrat and sysop status of the four users. Cordially, -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 11:20, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

CarolAnnO@fr.wiki

I gave her the sysop rights temporarily, without a RfA, so that she could have the account creator right for a teaching session. Seems it wasn't necessary, but anyway, it's been a fortnight and that's the time limit we agreed on. Thanks, --Esprit Fugace (talk) 08:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. Matanya (talk) 08:24, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

kaveh@fa.wiktionary

Please remove his administrator flag due to inactivity for over 4 years. Thanks --Americophile 19:39, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Done fr33kman 19:43, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Reza1615@fa.wikibooks

Reza1615 was granted a temporary three-month administrator flag on the Persian Wikibooks. His term of adminship was supposed to expire on 1 January 2012 but he still holds the flag. Please remove it. Thanks. --Americophile 20:18, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Done Please thank him for the work he has done here. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 20:21, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikimol@cs.wiki

As Czech Wikipedia has two new CheckUsers ([4][5]) I would like to retire. Thanks, --Wikimol (talk) 21:53, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Done thanks for your work. Matanya (talk) 21:54, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Ahoerstemeier@th.wikipedia

The Thai Wikipedia ArbCom have rights to review the administrator's status. Due to the decision link given above, the ArbCom has decided to have sysop and bureaucrat flag removed from Ahoerstemeier, based on the ground of inactivity and the current Admin policy. Ahoerstemeier has been notified with the issues. His reply indicated that he has no objections on removal of such tools. --G(x) (talk) 13:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Done --Bencmq (talk) 14:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Wap@th.wikipedia

The Thai Wikipedia ArbCom have rights to review the administrator's status. Due to the decision link given above, the ArbCom has decided to have sysop flag removed from Wap, based on the ground of inactivity and the current Admin policy. Wap has been notified with the issues, but no response has been given in the time period. --G(x) (talk) 13:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Done --Bencmq (talk) 14:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

ธวัชชัย@th.wikipedia

The Thai Wikipedia ArbCom have rights to review the administrator's status. Although the decision by ArbCom initially ruled to have his rights retained, ธวัชชัย has been notified with the issues, with his reply stated that due to his inactivity, he would like to have the sysop and bureaucrat flag removed through the standard procedure. --G(x) (talk) 13:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Done --Bencmq (talk) 14:33, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Mike@svwikibooks

We are discussing a new inactivity-policy on this wiki. Sysop-flag can be removed. Lavallen (talk) 06:45, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 08:58, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

SabineCretella@kawiktionary

Inactive user at project. User does not oppose desysopping. --Malafaya (talk) 12:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Devunt@testwiki

Not a real discussion, but it's what I feel of the community consensus. The user can't be trusted with sysop (and therefore crat) status as he used it to prevent good faith usage of the wiki without consensus according to his own interpretation of the wiki scope. There isn't a discussion process to add or remove flags (nor any "process" actually) on testwiki, so the best way seems to deflag and then rediscuss the assignation of flag as a local request if he feels like it. --Nemo 14:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:22, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Sir Lestaty de Lioncourt@ptwikinews

I think this is the last time... Thank you guys. --- @lestaty ^discuţie 03:06, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

On hold for 24 hours. PeterSymonds (talk) 08:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Done removing your bureaucrat flag based on your statement and intent. Just to ascertain, do you also want to quit the administrator flag?--Jusjih (talk) 11:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I'm leaving from wmf. Please remove sysop flag too. Thanks - @lestaty ^discuţie 13:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Done thanks for your time and efforts. Matanya (talk) 13:29, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

EugeneZelenko@be-x-old.wikipedia

Self-resignation. Please revoke my bureaucrat and administrator rights. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Done. MBisanz ^talk 03:27, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for help! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Zylbath@nds.wiktionary

Zylbath was elected as an admin by a local vote but the project does not have any bureaucrats of its own. Please promote Zylbath to admin status. Thanks ::Slomox:: >< 08:04, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Done, to expire 3.2.2012 Matanya 08:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. But why the expiration date? --::Slomox:: >< 20:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Unless a project has a lot of active users and has admins and bureaucrats we tend to give adminship for various periods (1 month, 3 months, 6 and so on. With communities with active users we would give perm. Hope that helps and feel free to ask any questions. fr33kman 21:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for the clarification. Never heard about that rule before. I guess, I'll have to check in again in six months then. --::Slomox:: >< 07:24, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

removed. Matanya 06:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

@Matanya, why did you remove his admin bit while he's awaiting an extension of his adminship here? Trijnstel 15:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Because the permission has expired, obviously, Trijnstel. I do not see anything wrong here... —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 16:36, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

It may not be strange, but imo he could've waited and extended the adminship in a few days. But maybe I'm wrong here. Trijnstel 16:43, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

خَرگوش@ks.wikipedia

I would like to request administrator privilege on Kashmiri Wikipedia. Unfortunately there is not community, however proposal was posted October 24 and no opposition since such day, having passed almost 2 weeks by now. --خَرگوش 06:37, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Done For three months until 7 February 2012. Ruslik 07:38, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

removed. Matanya 07:22, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Ciphers@ar.wikinews

I had the admin access three months ago, and it expired recently. Please renew my temporary access, or grant me a permanent access. Thanks in advance. Ciphers 07:20, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Please, post a local notice. Ruslik 16:16, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

There is already one in admin nomination page since May 2011, but it received no votes. --Ciphers 00:08, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Done, to expire 25 February 2012. PeterSymonds (talk) 08:05, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Removed. Bencmq (talk) 13:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

User J C D@de.wikibooks

The user is actually working on an own wikibook since 5 days (has already 123 edits on de.wikibooks) and has requested the confirmed right (on the page of a local bureaucrat) for being able to move his book pages this week-end. I don't see any reason that he shouldn't do that. He registered on wikibooks 30 January 2012 (I don't know why I can't find this in the newusers log, but today, I don't find my own registration log there either), but normally on de.wikibooks someone needs 7 days before becoming autoconfirmed. He has autoreview and editor rights on de.wikipedia (never been blocked). I've read on de.wiki that confirmed rights can only be granted by stewards, but not by local bureaucrats, so I'd like to know if this is done on this page. Geitost ^diskusjon 14:58, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Done --Vituzzu 15:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Oh thanks, that was very fast. :-) --Geitost ^diskusjon 15:05, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome, I'll remove the flag within some days when J C D will get confirmed automatically. --Vituzzu 17:05, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Ok, that makes sense. --Geitost ^diskusjon 18:26, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Users Koui²@fr.wikipedia and TED@fr.wikipedia

Both Koui² (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) and TED (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) seem to have lost their auto-patrolled status on fr.wikipedia. This could be related to a recent block that happened this morning. Can you fix this ? Udufruduhu 13:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Apparently, everything's fine now. Must have been some kind of transient effect of the blocking. You can archive the request. Udufruduhu 13:15, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

 Closed then. —Marco Aurelio (Nihil Prius Fide) 13:53, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Juandev@cs.wikiversity

Upon the community consensus (4 agree ("souhlas, souhlasím"), 1 disagree ("nesouhlasím")) I would like to ask for importer's rights on cs.wv. I would like to help with importing pages from wikies, for which transwiki import is not enabled. Juandev (talk) 08:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello. How long do you need them ? It would probably be better to grant transwiki import rights and to ask at Bugzilla for the import sources to be changed. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 08:38, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Well, until problems are resolved, which could take quite a long time (especially when importing from non WMF projects) So transwiki import is not a solution. --Juandev (talk) 09:02, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Done Please let us know when it's done. Regards, -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 09:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

OH, yes.--Juandev (talk) 09:33, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

I was asked to review this, and after reading the objections, I've decided to remove it. Furthermore two/four of the support comments were from new accounts, so there is no apparent consensus. PeterSymonds (talk) 09:10, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you Peter. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 10:24, 25 February 2012 (UTC)