Steward requests/Permissions/2017-05

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in May 2017, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Base@ukwikinews

Hi. Please grant me an administrator flag as per the vote. I used to be a temporary administrator in the wiki in 2013-2016 for 1358 days in total. --Base (talk) 17:49, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Done masti <talk> 21:09, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

A1@ukwikinews

Hi. Please grant the user an administrator flag as per the vote. He used to be a permanent administrator and bureaucrat in the wiki in 2007-2008 for 238 days in total. --Base (talk) 17:49, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Done masti <talk> 21:09, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Pxos@fiwikiversity

I have been a temporary administrator at the Finnish Wikiversity for six months (3 + 3) in 2016 per this discussion. (Cf. My user page here & the last extension) I did not have the time nor inspiration to extend my adminship after two consecutive "3-month-tours of duty". Now it seems that some pages need to be imported to Versity from Wikipedia, and only sysops can import pages. I would like to get temporary admin rights for another three months despite the gap. There is now only one administrator in the project, and he is clearly inactive and does not respond. --Pxos (talk) 09:27, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Please make a local announcement and link it here. --Pmlineditor (t · c · l) 19:44, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

I have now declared my intentions locally. --Pxos (talk) 12:17, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

{{inprogress}} to May 16. -- Avi (talk) 19:55, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Just a couple of minutes left to... withdraw the request. It seems importing pages to Versity is not in fashion right now, and therefore it is unlikely that I should be needing any advanced rights at present. --Pxos (talk) 20:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Closing as not done. Savh^ñ 10:58, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

MZaplotnik and Romanm @sl.wikipedia

The community of sl.wikipedia has voted two users, MZaplotnik and Romanm, long time administrators, for the CheckUser status. They both has agreed with nomination and has got 33 votes of support in a local poll which has lasted for 1 month. Therefore I request a steward to enable CheckUser options. If there is any question about the procedure on our wiki please let me know. --Janezdrilc (talk) 20:22, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

 On hold pending signature of the confidentiality agreement. —MarcoAurelio 11:05, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

I've just send both of them an email with instructions. Trijnstel_talk 18:42, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I've carefully read CheckUser policy, Access to nonpublic information policy & Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information and I've signed the confidentiality agreement using Phabricator's Legalpad. Regards, MZaplotnik ^(contribs) 20:22, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

MZaplotnik signed indeed the agreements, but Romanm not yet - so can't grant the rights yet. Trijnstel_talk 22:11, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Done as Romanm signed now too. I'll do the rest (cu wiki, irc, list) as well. Trijnstel_talk 21:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. --Janezdrilc (talk) 21:59, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

KRLS@ca.wikipedia

After a month-long voting process, KRLS's election as a CheckUser has been approved unanimously by 31 voters. Thanks, Townie (talk) 16:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

 On hold. User needs to sign the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information (phab:L10). —MarcoAurelio 16:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

@MarcoAurelio: Signed.--KRLS (talk) 18:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Standard operating procedure is that once a member of the WMF staff updates the list (for example) we update the status. Shouldn't be more than a day or two. Thank you for your patience. -- Avi (talk) 20:01, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Done. Will do the other stuff (list, wiki) too. Trijnstel_talk 22:33, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

User He3nry@de.wikipedia

His election has ended yesterday with 79,8 % votes in favour of him. -- Dschungelfan (talk) 07:39, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

 On hold pending signing confidentiality agreement. Trijnstel_talk 10:57, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I signed both agreements on saturday, --He3nry (talk) 07:28, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Done. Agreements signed. Trijnstel_talk 22:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Snaevar@is.wikipedia

Since I am no longer interested in my sysop and beurocrat rights at is.wikipedia I hereby request to have both my sysop and beurocrat status removed on is.wikipedia. --Snaevar (talk) 17:42, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Done. Matiia (talk) 17:48, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Dcastor@sv.wikipedia

It is one year since Dcastor was elected to administrator, so it is time to do a new election, but Dcastor does not want to continue as administrator. Svensson1 (talk) 23:00, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Done. Stryn (talk) 11:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Averater@sv.wikipedia

It is one year since Averater was elected to administrator, so it is time to do a new election, but Averater is inactive since a couple of months, so no new election has taken place. Svensson1 (talk) 23:00, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Done. Stryn (talk) 11:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

😂@en.wikipedia

It turns out my username isn't acceptable for an administrator. I'd rather lose my adminship than change my username. 😂 (talk) 16:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Out of curiosity, what happens if it's decided that you shouldn't have the name full stop? Primefac (talk) 16:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Enwiki can feel free to block me then. 😂 (talk) 16:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Bureaucrats can desysop on en.wikipedia. --Rschen7754 16:14, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Ah, I'd forgotten that! Eh, request is already here so no point in opening a discussion there at this point. 😂 (talk) 16:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

At least we will close this here, as stewards can't action here. Stryn (talk) 16:19, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

کاربر:همان@fa.wikipedia

pls remove my sysop access at fawiki.--همان (talk) 12:22, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done, @همان: there are local bureaucrats who can remove your admin rights. Please contact them. Stryn (talk) 14:43, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Sefer azeri@az.wikipedia

Please remove adminship according to voting results. For removal we need at least 2/3 of all valid votes. In this case 24 users voted, 21 for removal. --►Cekli829 13:10, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Hiǃ According to the fifth paragraph of “The regulations for electing administrators and bureaucrats” in the Azerbaijani Wikipedia, “the voting to acquire the status of an administrator or a bureaucrat can only be implemented following the general agreement of administrators.” But, not all the administrators currently operating in AzWiki voted for depriving the user of the status in the discussion launched by the user Cekli (see). The user Wertuose expressed his disagreement considering the reasons unjustified (I will write about it in more detail below), while some administrators didn’t participate in the voting at all. Nevertheless, the user Cekli started a new illegitimate voting on deprivation of the status finishing the discussion that he had launched. According to “The regulations for electing administrators and bureaucrats” a user applying to deprive an administrator of his/her status has to justify his/her demand in accordance with Wikipedia regulations. Otherwise, the demand related to deprivation of the status can be considered as revenge. The only reason that the user Cekli provided in order to deprive the administrator of the status, was the alleged claim about creating articles “serving Armenian interests”. However, I think that creating articles by users mustn’t serve as a basis for depriving them of their statuses. Because, Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia. --Sefer azeri (talk) 05:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

A general consensus has been reached: 7 sysop = 7 support. Wertuose - He wrote his own comment, but he did not vote. --►Cekli829 06:47, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

if possible I would bureacrts commenting here, Do you policy for removal of admin status by voting, I couldn't find the policy Mardetanha ^talk 19:27, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Mardetanha. This is the policy: Rules for the election of administrators and bureaucrats. --►Cekli829 19:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Hi Mardetanha. As a result of the vote, Sefer azeri lost his sysop status. --Sortilegus (talk) 21:19, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Done Mardetanha ^talk 12:07, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Təşəkkürlər! Thanks! --►Cekli829 12:13, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

User Rachitrali@incubator

User:Rachitrali is sockpuppetor using different accounts already blocked in English and according to wikipedia policy sockpuppetor can not use wikipedia for vandalise. Please remove his admin acess on Incubator (202.69.15.92 02:49, 8 May 2017 (UTC)).

Please handle this locally. He is a test wiki administrator and this user group can be removed by local bureaucrats. Matiia (talk) 02:59, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

User Xoser@diq.wikipedia

Local discussion on diq wiki.

1. This user is not continuously active 2017, 2014 and 2010.
2. This user does nothing about stewardship of Zazaki Wikipedia.
3. There are three active users on Zazaki Wikipedia. Two of them are already sysops and Zazaki Wikipedia is a small wikipedia, consisted by only three users, it doesn't need another sysop, three sysops are unnecessary.
4. Asmen and Mirzali are two admins of Zazaki Wikipedia. Zazaki wikipedia is very small, so it doesn't need another admin. It's redundant to have another sysop on this small wiki. Vuzorg (talk) 16:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

 On hold as long as the voting/discussion is continuing there, also using sock puppets is not allowed in voting, this also applies for all admins. Stryn (talk) 16:34, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Don't continue the discussion on this page. Preferred places to discuss are the diq.wikipedia's voting page, or if you want to discuss with the stewards about this request please use the Stewards' noticeboard. Stryn (talk) 11:31, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
I, Asmen and Mirzali, we don't use sock puppets, you can check all our contributions, even Asmen and Mirzali are sysops, they don't need to use sock puppets. A third sysop is superfluous for Zazaki Wikipedia, as I said it's a very small wikipedia. But if you look at Kirmanciye's and Neribij's contribution past, you will see that they came local discussion only for voting and they may be sock puppets of Xoser. Their contributions are not continuously same as Xoser's contribution past. Vuzorg (talk) 14:10, 19 April 2017 (UTC) I'm not a sock puppet of anyone (But I'm not sure about Vuzorg). I'm active in Zazaki Wikipedia and Turkish wikipedia too. Mirzali want using wikipedia as his personal blog. He was prevented many people in wikipedia zazaki without cause. Therefore he taken from the sysop, three-four years ago. I and many people have been away from wikipedia, sometimes, because of Mirzali's (and Mirzali's team) interventions and inhibitions. Xoser is a balance for everyone can write on wikipedia and he is a fair sysop in my opinion. Neribij (talk) 05:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Can you prove it? Your contribution past is same as Xoser's and Kirmaciye's. And all your votes are against to removal of Xoser's sysop access. You, Kirmanciye and Xoser all your actions are was on 2014 and 2017. Is this a just a similarity? I dont think so. You are attacking to Mirzali by your words. What's Mirzali's team? Can you verify your claims? The problem is that, a third sysop is needless to Zazaki Wikipedia. It's a small wikipedia, it's not like English or German Wikipedia. There are only three permanent active users on Zazaki Wikipedia. And Xoser was not active between 2014 and 2017, 3 years, and he does nothing for Zazaki Wikipedia. We don't need him, already there are two sysops on Zazaki Wikipedia. Vuzorg (talk) 14:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Will someone deal with this Xoser problem? There are 2 permanent active users on Zazaki Wikipedia (two admins Asmen, Mirzali and I). Two admins of Zazaki Wikipedia and I, we agreed on that Xoser is needless as a sysop. We demanded removal of his sysop access from: [1], [2],[3]. Vuzorg (talk) 20:54, 26 April 2017 (UTC) I’m a founder of the Zazaki Wikipedia page. I don't have another account and I don't use "sockpuppets" either. As it is, there are only 3-4 more active users on Zazaki Wikipedia. But Zazaki Wikipedia has old and constant users who have a lot of contributions. Vuzorg changes many articles of other users, just because he does not like the style (For example:1 2). For this reason, many people left wikipedia. If this vandalism of his continues, Wikipedia will become the blog of 2-3 people alone. In local discussion, some new and passive users such as Otrox62 and Memedaga only have 20-40 contributors. Even so, there isn't enough "support" vote. Xoser (talk) 21:27, 27 April 2017 (UTC) So what if you are a founder of Zazaki Wikipedia? What will change if you don't do your sysop duties? On local discussion Xoser used sock puppets named as Kirmanciye, Azadi, Neribij and Asmen34 (he refers to sysop Asmen here). Look at to our contribution's past. Our contributions are permanent: My contribution past Mirzali's contributions past (sysop) and Asmen's contribution past (sysop) And look at to Xoser and his sock puppet's Kirmanciye, Azadi, Neribij, Asmen34 contributions: Xoser's contribution past 2017-2014 Xoser's sock puppet Neribij's contribution past 2017-2014 Xoser's sock puppet Kirmanciye's contribution past 2017-2014 Xoser's sock puppet Asmen34's contribution past 2017 This is local discussion on Zazaki Wikipeida. As you see Xoser used his 4 sock puppets for vote against removal of his sysop acces. There are only 3 regular active users on Zazaki Wikipedia, I, Mirzali (sysop) and Asmen (sysop). And we agreed on removal of Xoser's sysop access, because he uses sock puppets and he manipulates local discussion by this way and he is not an active user and he does nothing about sysopship of Zazaki Wikipedia. And Xoser had automatically been desysopped due to the rules. A steweard made him a sysop again only for his demand. This is not fair. Vuzorg (talk) 08:13, 28 April 2017 (UTC) Yes, look at the contribution frequence and also the times these guys have been active.. --asmên 14:42, 28 April 2017 (UTC) Unfortunately User:Mirzali still needs to learn much about principles of Wiki-projects (en:Wikipedia:Civility , en:Wikipedia:Assume good faith etc.) He has vandalized user's page. Adminship doesn't give users to abuse Wiki-policies. I think, for the balance on diq.wikipedia it's very important that Xoser's adminship continues. Cheers!--Gomada (talk) 19:56, 28 April 2017 (UTC) Unlike me, your problem is that you have an allergy to a Zaza like me. Every time you get out of the background and try to wipe me out. Why do you have that hatred and all this rage in you? Is it because I do not share your religious values and political views? Just give it to me! If there is anyone else interested in me, I am a convinced atheist. In addition, I am not politically active. I am neither a Turk nor a Kurd. So I have nothing to do with pathological ideologies such as religion and nationalism. So at last give me rest with your intrigues, slander and lies. I'm tired of it now. -- Mirzali (talk) 08:32, 29 April 2017 (UTC) The problem is not Mirzali or Mirzali's actions and the balance of diq.wikipedia is not based on Xoser. As I said, Xoser was not active for 3 years. He came up with that he is ill. How a person can be ill for 3 years? He was inactive between 2014-2017, he made nothing for Zazaki Wikipedia in this period, he did not made even a tiny contribution for Zazaki Wikipedia. Xoser had automatically been desysopped due to the rule of 2 years of inactivity. But a steward made him sysop again. This is not fair. When we started a local discussion on Zazaki Wikipedia Xoser came out suddenly. The problem is that, Xoser or another, a third sysop is needless for Zazaki Wikipedia. And Gomada is a sysop of Kurdish Wikipedia, he/she is not from Zazaki Wikipedia. And he/she attacks Zazaki Wikipedia's sysop Mirzali and he/she interferes in Zazaki Wikipedia's own problem. This is Gomada's user page on Kurdish Wikipedia Vuzorg (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC) The problem is some guys cannot act political neutral and try to politicize with the language and alphabet. We as Wikipedia sysops have to be political neutral and should not try to bring Turkish, Islamic or Kurdish influence from outside especially by persons who don't have language proficiency. --asmên 21:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC) You're free to consider yourself whatever you want, but that doesn't change the reality ;) read en:Zazas. That's why it's important to have a balance on diq.wikipedia. Otherwise, you will keep to block users who doesn't accept your point of view on diq.wiki, as you did in the past. (see 1, 2) Wikipedia belongs everyone who wants to build it up!--Gomada (talk) 09:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC) I think that sysop of Kurdish Wikipedia Gomada (who inteferes Zazaki Wikipedia's own problem and who attacking Zazaki Wikipedia's sysops) does not understand the problem. Again I say, Xoser had automatically been desysopped due to the rule of 2 years of inactivity. But a steward made him sysop again. This is unfair. Xoser did not made even a tiny contribution to Zazaki Wikipedia for 3 years (2014-2017). So as members of Zazaki Wikipedia, we demand removal of his sysop access. And this is Gomada's destruction on Zazas article in English Wikipedia. You can see that Gomada changed all 'Zaza' words as Kurdish. As I said Gomada is sysop of Kurdish Wikipedia and he does not have right to interfere Zazaki Wikipedia's own problem. Vuzorg (talk) 10:51, 29 April 2017 (UTC) Xoser had automatically been desysopped due to the rule of 2 years of inactivity and this is evidence. As Melos says Xoser met the AAR inactivity criteria. But a steward made him sysop again, only for his demand. This is unfair. If so, all members can demand this from stewards. When we started local discussion on Zazaki Wikipedia, he came out after 3 years of inactivity. He did nothing for Zazaki Wikipedia for 3 years. The problem is that Xoser did nothing for Zazaki Wikipedia but he does not want to be desysopped too.Vuzorg (talk) 10:09, 30 April 2017 (UTC) Xoser is racist against Armenian people. He says this page is an Armenian propaganda and he deleted the Armenian word from the article, he says 'are you Armenian' to sysop Asmen and he again deletes the Armenian word from article, he says all you are Armenian. A sysop must be respectful and tolerant to all people, all nations. Xoser is not enoughly respectful. Vuzorg (talk) 15:17, 30 April 2017 (UTC) It is unfortunately true that Xoser yesterday made Armenophobic comments against me just with the reason I added with historical correctness that the area called today Northern Kurdistan is historically a part of Western Armenia. His comments without any attest were "this is an Armenian propaganda" (like Turkish nationalist use this kind of arguments against Kurdish patriots) and "Have you become Armenian now?!!". He tries to insult and discredit me but he should aware of the political incorrectness of his arguments as a sysop and that to his colleague! His friends claimed with Xoser the preservation of political balance in Zazaki Wikipedia. But a person with Armenophobic ressentiments and as a Kurdish patriot cannot handle objective and his place as sysop is out of place. User:Asmen 09:45, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done, clearly not consensus to remove admin rights per the local discussion. Stryn (talk) 18:31, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

We demonstrated that all these accounts came only for vote in favor of Xoser, from different wikipedias too. How can this be ignored? Because of this there is an ostensibly consensus not to remove admin rights. You should take cognizance of this fact. We did not call our friends from different wikipedias, if you want this we also can call our friends for voting and we can create a consensus about removal of Xoser's sysop. Vuzorg (talk) 19:59, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

User AlessioMela@it.wikipedia

Please remove admin status. AlessioMela has been already informed and thanked for his work. Thank you. --НУРшЯGIO^{(beware of the moose)} 23:52, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Done, with many thanks for their past work. RadiX∞ 23:58, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Sanjeev bot@hi.wikipedia

As per local policy - "...आवेदन करने के 7 दिन बाद तक मतदान प्रक्रिया चलेगी, इसके पश्चात परिणाम को कोई भी प्रबन्धक मॅटा विकि पर लेकर जायेगा..." voting should continue for a period of at least 7 days. But the nomination took place on December 20 (w:hi:विकिपीडिया:प्रबन्धक_पद_के_लिये_निवेदन/पुरालेख_०४#Sanjeev_bot) and the rights were given on 24th December(Steward_requests/Permissions/2016-12#sanjeev_bot.40hi.wikipedia). Which was against the local policy. This was Invaild And secondly that the nomination was for 1 year rights. "अभी एक बार पुनः एक वर्ष के लिए प्रबन्धक-बॉट अधिकार चाहता हूँ।" means "I want to be the sysop-bot right now once again for one year." Sanjeev hides from Steward that the nomination is temporary. Steward Removes Admin flag immediately. And take strong action. Sanjeev has betrayed Steward. Bot the flag should also be removed from morality. Because it's not working right. It is doing the editing of the AWB's typo. For more information see here Requests for comment/Breaking of rules by the Sysop on Hindi Wikipedia-Jayprakash12345 (talk) 10:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

@Steward, Immediately Remove flag -Jayprakash12345 (talk) 06:17, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

• There is no local announcement or discussion on local wiki. Above user is novice with wiki.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 08:49, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

@संजीव कुमार: Can you tells steward that This was a temporary or permanent nomination. Why did you betrayed Steward.-Jayprakash12345 (talk) 17:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Not done Please, make a local announcement first and then come back if there is a consensus. Ruslik (talk) 11:10, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

ChVA@ru.wikisource

User not active for over 2 years. He also did not respond to reminders. There is local consensus for removal of access. Lozman (talk) 12:07, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 12:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Aphaia@ja.wikinews

Aphaia has not been active in Japanese Wikinews for over a year. Therefore, please remove the flag of sysop and bureaucrat. This is due to the automatic retirement policy.--アルトクール (talk) 05:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

• Done Please thank Aphaia for his work. -- Avi (talk) 14:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

EivindJ@nowikipedia

The user has decided not to seek re-election as administrator for another period, see discussion above. Danmichaelo (talk) 09:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 12:49, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Kristiand Vangen@nowikipedia

The user has decided not to seek re-election as administrator for the another period, see discussion above. Danmichaelo (talk) 09:30, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 12:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Jphwra@ukwiki

I want to clear this status. Thank you. --Jphwra (talk) 19:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

On hold for 24 hours per the standard practice. Stryn (talk) 20:42, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

@Stryn: Can I withdraw the statement? --Jphwra (talk) 09:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Sure. Marked as not done. Stryn (talk) 10:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

@Stryn: Thank. --Jphwra (talk) 11:11, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Coet@ca.wikipedia

The used has not decided to seek re-election as a CheckUser. Could you please remove his CU flag, while keeping the admin one? Thanks, --Townie (talk) 18:31, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Since 2012 no re-elections were held. And I see no reminder on his user talk. Did someone ask him whether he wanted to reapply? Trijnstel_talk 20:25, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

The need of a new re-election was discussed here, and he said he wanted to collaborate again but he may not be able to this summer. Nonetheless, this comment was made after the election process was opened, so he must have seen it. --Townie (talk) 07:49, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

We assume he might have seen it, but perhaps he didn't. I still would like to see a reminder, and then wait for 2 weeks or so... Trijnstel_talk 12:37, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Message sent. Thanks for everything, --Townie (talk) 16:45, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

I have seen it. I don't know if I can keep my flag after the new situation where cawiki users have decided to have a new Checkuser. They assumed I didn't want to renew my flag because I was absent. If there is no place to three Checkuser I understand that I must loose my flag, no matter about it. Coet (talk) 15:34, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

@Coet: Please confirm if you are resigning the CU flag or you wish to check with the community first. Thanks, —MarcoAurelio 15:41, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

There is no policy against having more than 2 CUs—just fewer. As long as the minimal activity requirements are met there isn't a policy concern. The local project may implement an activity policy that is more restrictive should it choose. -- Avi (talk) 16:17, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

As a local bureaucrat I can confirm there was a renewal of local checkusers, user Coet did not apply for renewal and there is a community consensus for do not maintain such user right for users without a minimum activity. Please, remove his checkuser access per community decision. That said, I thank Coet for his work and his community engagement. --Vriullop (talk) 19:47, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Done. —MarcoAurelio 13:54, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Basio@ukwiki

I would like to have my current status revoked. --Basio (talk) 07:40, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

 On hold: Standard operating procedure to hold regular self-requests for 24 hours. -- Avi (talk) 16:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Done. —MarcoAurelio 13:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Samral@azwikipedia

Məndən idarəçilik statusunun alınmasını istəyirəm. (translate.google.com: I want my admin status removed.)--Samral (talk) 10:02, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

On hold for 24 hours per standard practice. (24 saat beklenecektir.).--HakanIST (talk) 10:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Done. —MarcoAurelio 13:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

tufor@plwikipedia, tufor@plwikimedia

Please remove my admin rights on these wikis as I no longer need them. Thanks, tufor (talk) 17:41, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

 On hold for 24 hours per standard practice. Trijnstel_talk 21:20, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for your work. RadiX∞ 20:35, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Cpro@jawiki

Please remove my sysop flag in Japanese Wikipedia. Thanks, cpro (talk) 02:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

On hold for 24 hours per standard practice. RadiX∞ 02:09, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Removed. Stryn (talk) 18:12, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

MAGISTER@de.wikipedia

end of term in de.Arbcom Itti (talk) 22:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Done --Melos (talk) 22:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Ibrahim Ben Khalifa@arwikibooks

I'm an IT teacher from Tunisia. I am in the process of completing an education project about adding an article in the ar.Wikibooks. The biggest obstacle that I face is the inability to add accounts for my pupils, beaucause of using a single IP adress in the classroom wich is 41.231.148.237 where we can not create more than six accounts. I request the permission to give me the permission of account creator to be able to establish the number of 40 account at least in this wiki (with the knowledge that IP adress, which I use is 41.231.148.237 as the project runs from 24 / 01/2017 to the end of April 2017); of course after reviewing the pedagogical project details that you will allow. With thanks for the assistance. (your remarks) Ibrahim Ben Khalifa (talk) 14:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-04-31. Granted for a week, please let us know if you need this right any longer. Could you please notify the arwikibooks community somewhere and create the accounts with some sort of identifiable pattern? Note you will have to create the accounts while logged in using ar:b:Special:CreateAccount. Savh^ñ 20:09, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Adjusting time per the request. Please remember to notify the community. Savh^ñ 20:22, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

31 of April = 1st of May. Noting it concerns accountcreator rights. Savh^ñ 01:10, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Removed —MarcoAurelio 12:21, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Bobbyshabangu@ss.wikipedia

I want to be an administrator on the SiSwati Wikipedia. I want to have have access to protected pages such as the landing page so that I can organize, clean and rename some of the items since SiSwati is my mother tongue and I have been contributing to this wiki for some time now. Bobbyshabangu (talk) 02:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Please make a local request to allow for possible community input. Savh^ñ 10:05, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

We now have a request at ss:Wikipedia:Likhefi_leinthanethi#Administrator. On hold until 9 February, I guess? ;-) --MF-W 14:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Agreed; on hold until February 9. MBisanz ^talk 13:15, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-05-09. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Stryn (talk) 14:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Removed —MarcoAurelio 09:25, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Beko@hy.wiktionary

Hello. I would like to get more long time admin rights, if it possible. In last time it's been 1.5 year. Beko (talk) 12:43, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2017-05-10. ~ Nahid ^Talk 16:54, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Removed —MarcoAurelio 09:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Wintereu@rowikivoyage

Recent changes patroller on ro.wikipedia with a long history on patrolling, I'm requesting temporary adminship on ro.wikivoyage for cleanup purposes only. If requested, I can give specific examples about what exactly I intend to do. Thank you. Winter^eu 23:05, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

On hold until 4 February. --MF-W 23:08, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Per local rule (Nominalizarea se face în timp de 15 zile), should be on hold until 12 February. Stryn (talk) 14:09, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Actually 12 February, 22:27 (UTC), to be more precise. Then, and only then, would have passed the recommended 15 days. Winter^eu 13:38, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-05-13. -- Stryn (talk) 09:59, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2017-05-13. Permissions granted by Stryn. – Ajraddatz (talk) 09:19, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Yep, for some reason my message was removed. Stryn (talk) 09:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Extended —MarcoAurelio 09:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Doostdar@fawikibooks

Thanks AFlorence (talk) 13:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

There needs to be a new local request. --MF-W 14:21, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

hi dear @MF-Warburg: , i,m create This local request from 3 day old, and this small project wiki and not very active thanks --AFlorence (talk) 14:34, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

 On hold until August 19. MBisanz ^talk 21:01, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

hi @MBisanz and MF-Warburg: , today is (August 19) --AFlorence (talk) 11:36, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

 Granted for 9 months to expire on 2017-05-19. MBisanz ^talk 11:49, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Dear @MBisanz: , --AFlorence (talk) 12:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

removed Stryn (talk) 12:30, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Jaloliddin Madaminov@tg.wiktionary

If there is insufficient community; temporary would be fine. See to my page Tajik Wikipedia.

Help. Thank you. Jaloliddin Madaminov 06:00, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

 On hold till 19 January 2017. Ruslik (talk) 19:32, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

 Granted for 4 months to expire on 2017-05-19. – Ajraddatz (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

removed Stryn (talk) 12:30, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Elvonudinium@bxrwikipedia

I would like to re-apply for adminship on Buryat Wikipedia. Since the community on the site is very limited, I request the longest period possible. I had been a sysop on the website since February 2014 until my rights expired recently. I usually make consistent contributions and when it is not possible do general upkeep and maintenance.--Elvonudinium (talk) 11:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year and 6 months to expire on 2017-05-25. --MF-W 16:45, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

removed Stryn (talk) 05:55, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Ooswesthoesbes@oldwikisource

I would like to request import upload rights (for importing xml) at the Old Wikisource. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 10:53, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 13:34, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 14:00, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

丁子君@zh_classicalwiki

Please grant him reviewer right. This user is good at Classical Chinese and familiar with the policies on Classical Chinese Wikipedia. The vote has been held for a week, and there are three supports and no objections. Amanojaku (talk) 07:43, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Done. --MF-W 14:50, 29 May 2017 (UTC)