Steward requests/Permissions/2020-11

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in November 2020, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

Anasskoko@Hausa Wikipedia

Looking for sysop right in Hausa Wikipedia to ease the work of other administration that we currently have, and to perform administrative work to develope Hausa Wikipedia. Anasskoko^Talk 13:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2021-05-05. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. —Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contribs} 16:42, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Saimawnkham@shnwiktionary

My adminrights expired on 23 October 2020. So I would like to request for the renewal of adminrights. Thanks. Saimawnkham (talk) 06:48, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2021-11-08. Ruslik (talk) 08:30, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Saimawnkham@shnwikipedia

My adminship at shn.wikipedia expired at 6th October 2020. So I want to request for adminship. I hope I can get a long time adminshiop. Thanks. Saimawnkham (talk) 06:48, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 2 years to expire on 2022-11-08. Ruslik (talk) 08:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

bennylin@jvwikt

I'm already long-term sysops in multiple projects such as id.wikipedia and id.wikt. I'm requesting a permanent adminship in jv.wikt. If you're just gonna give a temp admin, then don't bother. ✒ Bennylin 11:38, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Steward note: This is also a request for int. adminship. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:19, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

 On hold until 2020-10-22 @Bennylin: Per the guidelines, 5+ voters who are an active participant of the project are necessary for a permanent adminship to be granted. Right now, in your case, only two persons with more than 50 edits at jv.wikt voted. Per the guidelines, the adminship will be temporary (possibly for a year rather than 6 months, given you are apparently trusted at several projects), unless that changes before the voting finishes. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:53, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Apropo, is this a request only for interface adminship? Or do you want both flags (sysop and interface-admin)? --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:57, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Both flags please. ✒ Bennylin 00:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

@Bennylin: I granted one year temporary sysop for now. Please enable 2FA before I can give you interface adminship. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:28, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Bennylin, still waiting. --Base (talk) 11:32, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Done For adminship, Not done for interface adminship - still no 2FA enabled. I also revoked your idwiki interface adminship per WMF policy. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:20, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Vito Genovese@trwikibooks

I was a temp sysop at the project from March to September 2017. I re-requested for temporary adminship + interface adminship, and there seems to be consensus for promotion. My plan is to use the former right for a comprehensive cleanup that the project sorely needs and the latter right for the porting and maintenance of gadgets / user scripts that I help develop or maintain at trwiki.--Vito Genovese 19:23, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2021-11-09. Ruslik (talk) 20:31, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Kibi78704@gdwiktionary

I am requesting renewal of my admin rights. Thank you. Kibi78704 (talk) 14:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2021-11-09. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:27, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Katariq@quwikipedia

Good morning. I would like to get the adminship of the Quechuan Wikipedia for 1 year in order to modernize and improve it (as I have already done in the main page). I would like to make new templates, renew some information, make new contents, improve the bots, and prevent it from vandalism Katariq (talk) 16:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

I do not find any adminship request at the link provided. Ruslik (talk) 20:33, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Please, take a look again. The link says "musuq kamachiq". In the description I provide, it says " I would like to request administrator grants for this project", and there are 2 supporting votes Katariq (talk) 20:42, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

There is a question from one use that you have not answered yet. Ruslik (talk) 08:34, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

You can go to the page of the user qu:Ruraq rimanakuy:Elwinlhq, I have answered him in his discussion page. We have coordinated a meeting, in which I provide him all the projects and the objectives that the Quechua Wikipedia needs to implement. Greetings Katariq (talk) 22:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2021-05-10. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 13:33, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Mahir256@bnwikibooks

The Bengali Wikisource is part of a proofreadathon across Indian languages running through the first of November. One of the works included is a cookbook of recipes from north-central Bengal, the contents of which are good candidates for inclusion in a Wikibooks' Cookbook: namespace. Given that the last bnwikibooks sysop was globally locked for COI/undisclosed paid editing/what have you, and that the project is otherwise basically dormant (lots of speedy deletion requests have gone unfulfilled), I would like to request sysop/interface sysop rights on bnwikibooks so that I can clean up that wiki and make sufficient changes to support the infusion of appropriately restructured, reformatted content from bnwikisource--that is, to the extent that would otherwise be discouraged on Wikisource for not actually preserving the formatting of a source text. Mahir256 (talk) 06:10, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

 On hold until 8 November 2020 Ruslik (talk) 20:45, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

@Mahir256: What is the reason for the opposing vote? Ruslik (talk) 08:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: That account is rather new, the opinion given being their first edit on that account (@NahidSultan: is this possibly the aforementioned former admin in disguise?), but the opinion given amounts to "I'm new to Wikibooks, but I have experience on Wikihow and also want to contribute here; I don't support your having the right because I too want the right". Mahir256 (talk) 08:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2021-05-10. Ruslik (talk) 13:31, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

User:Ruslik0 Although I am new, I have experience working at WikiHow ,Also I would like to improved Mahir256 to Wikibooks with very few contributions and admin rights .Which I am willing to do so I too can get the right of the administrator.That's why I improved Wikibooks(This was my opposition because any experienced user could easily get the administrator rights) . I was opposed to this.Mahir256 says (@NahidSultan: is this possibly the aforementioned former admin in disguise?) But You misunderstand.Mcepy (talk) 20:25, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Nitesh Gill@pa.wikipedia

Hi, I am Nitesh from the Punjabi community. I need permanent administrator rights on Punjabi Wikipedia. I am working on Punjabi Wikipedia and creating or developing articles on the daily bases, minimum one article each day from 3 to 4 years. During these edits, I found some errors on the pages which I can't fix on Wikipedia by myself with admin rights. I also want to handle some further work of an administrator. Please let me know if you have some follow-up questions. Nitesh Gill (talk) 09:26, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so much Ruslik -- Nitesh Gill (talk) 07:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Taylor_49@eowiktionary

Hello ... I would like to re-acquire sysopship for EO wiktionary. The discussion has been open during 17 days and there are only 2 votes. I was sysop 2019-Apr...2020-Apr but I was offline since 2020-Feb so my sysopship expired silently during that time. There are no bureaucrats and no active sysops either. There was a heavy vandalism attack against EO wiktionary ca 3 months ago and no local sysop was available. The mess was partially fixed by global admins and stewards. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:20, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2021-11-13. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks ... this was superfast :-) Taylor 49 (talk) 19:29, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

No problem - thanks for what you do :). Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:32, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Lepticed7@eowiktionary

Hi. I started a vote two weeks ago on the esperanto Wiktionary and I only get 2 votes. Lepticed7 (talk) 21:32, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2021-05-14. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! See you in 6 months. :) Lepticed7 (talk) 14:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

QueerEcofeminist@mrwikisource

As my temporary sysop rights ended on 13th Nov, I had requested for community approval to continue sysop rights and addition of interface rights too. Given the earlier stewards comments who granted me admin rights Special:Diff/20082468/20082847, this term would be bit longer if not permanent? I have also requested for 2FA for interface. thanks QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 18:51, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2021-11-15. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. I'm still not comfortable with granting permanent adminship, but I granted you an adminship for one year. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:52, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Qareken Balasi@kaawikipedia

Good day! I am from Karakalpakstan asking the admin panel to correct all the errors in the Karakalpak Wikipedia and make corrections in the future. I'm putting together a team to improve the Karakalpak Wikipedia. Qareken Balasi (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

 On hold Investigating possible election tampering. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Qareken Balasi, you have only registered last month. So did the people voting for you. Could you explain the situation please? I am happy you are interested in Wikipedia, I also saw the Telegram group you have. But it is unusual. --Base (talk) 12:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

• Base Good afternoon! Yes! I have a new account, the old one for unknown reasons was deleted and lost access to accounts and mail! I come from Karakalpakstan and live in Kazakhstan, I want to fix all the mistakes on the Karakalpak Wikipedia and fix everything! For this, I am recruiting a team for the development of Karakalpak Wikipedia. --Qareken Balasi (talk) 12:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

  Qareken Balasi, what is your old account? Also is RakhmonovFilms an account of yours? --Base (talk) 13:32, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

  Base Yes, this account! The reason was that I was supposedly doing advertising. I figured out everything now I want to take up my language Karakalpak because there are very big mistakes and there is a lot to do, that is, to contribute to the Karakalpak Wikipedia. --Qareken Balasi (talk) 14:01, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

(still pending trying to figure out the whole situation) --Base (talk) 09:31, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2021-02-21. . Qareken Balasi, I have to make a few things clear: several accounts are generally not allowed. Please have all three of them (for the record there is also Special:CentralAuth/Rakhmonov Shaxbozbek) disclosed on your userpage. Also please notify users about the votes mainly using on wiki communication means. The Telegram group did include canvassing in my opinion. On the other hand there are no valid oppose votes: Kagansky voted against, but they are active only on uzwiki and the editorial dispute has happened outside kaawiki too, and I also see that you are indeed working on kaawiki. I recognise that you have a block on ruwiki, but since it is about a promotional sounding username, it is not a big deal too. That being said this request is very much on borderline and I do hope that you refer to conflict of interest and notability policies of larger Wikipedias (such as Russian or English Wikipedias) for your kaawiki development. Feel free to ask any relevant questions related to admin rights; please make sure to translate the interface to Karakalpak on translatewiki: rather than locally. I have made a note for other stewards in your log to refer to this request for your further right grants. To prolong your adminship you will have to start a new vote about a week before this adminship expires and then submit the results of the vote here with a new request. --Base (talk) 13:42, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

H78c67c@yuewiktionary

I am requesting extension of my sysop and interface-admin rights on yuewiktionary. Thank you. H78c67c (talk) 00:44, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

 On hold until 14 November 2020 Ruslik (talk) 20:30, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: Sorry for bothering you. Could you please have a look at this? Thank you. H78c67c (talk) 04:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2021-11-15. Ruslik (talk) 08:13, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Several users@smnwiki

A vote was started on October 20 about who should be the administrators on the new Inari Sámi Wikipedia (smnwiki), which resulted in the following seven users being elected:

• Muotâ (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Yupik (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Seipinne (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Mlolthuis (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Jon Harald Søby (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• SaMSUoM (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Trondtr (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)

Jon Harald Søby (talk) 10:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Jon Harald Søby, could you explain the election process, please? As I understand, the nominations were done by adding people to the table, and votes pro were done by adding voter's username to the second column. What does a "(?)" next to your username mean? Also I saw that one of the nominated users was removed from the table during the election. Did they decline the nomination? In fact it is not clear for me who has explicitly agreed, except for the ones who nominated themselves. --Base (talk) 15:10, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

I removed the "(?)" after Jon Harald Søby. I asked Jon Harald Søby by e-mail whether he wanted to be an administrator. I just forgot to remove the "(?)" after he agreed. User:Mlolthuis was removed from the table because she had originally declined the nomination but then changed her mind. Every user in the list has explicitly agreed to be an administrator. I personally asked each and every of them either by e-mail or on their respective Talk page. Then I recorded the answers under the table: "Vástádâsah" (=Anwers) and "haalijd leđe fáárust" (=wants to be part of the team of administrators). If you have any further questions, please let me know. --Muotâ (talk) 20:25, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2021-02-18. All the above-mentioned users were promoted to administrators for three months (the standard period for new wikis). To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:25, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

jimkillock@la.wikibooks

This project currently has no administrator. I want to bring across a number of template facilities from Wikisource; I will also investigate whether this can be packaged and maintained as a MediaWiki extension. I am also trying to bring together a cross-site Latin community to bring more knowledge and use to some of these projects. For la Wikibooks, I have some simple public domain content adaptation (notes, accents, parallel texts) in mind, which woud be easy for others to contribute to. JimKillock (talk) 07:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Update: If the MediaWiki extension turns out to be unecessary or not appropriate (I am checking) I am hoping the work of porting the relevant tamples and CSS from Wikisource to la.wikibooks will provide a model for en.wikibooks and others to investigate and implement, as I can document what the necessary changes are. JimKillock (talk) 09:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

What was the result of that discussion? Can you summarize? Especially what does that comment in Latin mean? Ruslik (talk) 08:23, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Andreas (commenting in Latin) agrees that taking on a project like this may be a waste of time, but also says that I am not wrong in what I say (about missing features I assume) but that he has problems with a translated book he has added, as there is nobody to deal with deletions he needs. The main outcome of discussions so far has been to narrow down what is required to add the Wikisource layout features. The conclusion, I would say, is mild support, no opposition, but to warn I may be wasting my time. FWIW it seems a good idea to see if I can steer it a bit towards having some relevant content before a decision is taken whether it is better to close and port the content. JimKillock (talk) 10:02, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Summary: No objections lodged about adminship but queries about the continued value of la.wikibooks. On the technical side, there is some interest in trying to make new layout features work on .la.wikibooks first. We appear to have narrowed down the requirements a lot. JimKillock (talk) 19:47, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Is there anything else you need to help this progress? JimKillock (talk) 17:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2021-02-18. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 16:27, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, @Ruslik0:. JimKillock (talk) 21:25, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Htawmonzel@mnw.wikipedia

(My adminship for Mon Wikipedia will be expired on 11. December 2020. I would like to extend it. If possible I want to be a permanent adminship for Mon Wikipedia) Htawmonzel (talk) 10:28, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 2 years to expire on 2022-11-18. Granted for two years. Your community is still quite small for a permanent adminship. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:31, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

User Леонид_Макаров@ru.wikibooks

We need a permanent administrator. There is a lot of admin's work to be done in this project. Last--Леонид Макаров (talk) 04:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

I can only offer another one year term. Ruslik (talk) 20:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Maybe "Granted for 2 years to expire on 2022-11-20"?--Леонид Макаров (talk) 20:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 2 years to expire on 2022-11-19. Ruslik (talk) 20:45, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you!--Леонид Макаров (talk) 20:47, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

अनिरुद्ध कुमार@hi.wikibooks

The user's temporary admin and interface admin rights are expiring soon. Clear consensus to extend. --SM7^--talk-- 05:44, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Fixed discussion link. -- CptViraj (talk) 05:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 2 years to expire on 2022-11-20. --Sotiale (talk) 06:09, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

@SM7, CptViraj, and अनिरुद्ध कुमार: IA flag is temporarily revoked until 2FA is activated. Please enable 2FA and let us know. Or tell अनिरुद्ध कुमार to enable 2FA. --Sotiale (talk) 06:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Gilles2014@ht.wikipedia

Hello, I have been administrating the haitian Wikipedia since 2018 and I was the only administrator there.I’d like to continue to administrate this wiki, please. I fought against vandalism, I created more than 2400 articles in 2020 including those on covid-19, I welcome new contributors and reread the contributions of others, I translate Wikimedia event announcements.--Gilles2014 (talk) 21:48, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Please extend Gilles2014. He's been a temporary admin at htwiki for years with no problems, and there are no objections. There are very few active editors right now. WhatamIdoing (talk) 23:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2021-11-20. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:12, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your trust and recommandation.--Gilles2014 (talk) 23:04, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Ciell@pap.wikipedia

Hi, requesting admin access per proposal in the local Village Pump. There's only one admin on the project, and he replied to me by email he sincerely welcomes the extra help on the project. Goal is to (hopefully) teach at least two new admins how to manage a wiki, and do some backlogged maintenance. Ciell (talk) 17:51, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

@Ciell:  Granted for 3 months to expire on 2021-02-20. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:10, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Đức Anh@viwikibooks

There are no active administrators. Đức Anh (talk) 15:57, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Not done Please start a local discussion about getting the rights at that project, and once it's over, please fill a new request. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:18, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Sami_At_Ferḥat@kab.wikipedia.org

I'd like to renew my user rights in this wiki. (admin status lost 2 months ago) Sami At Ferḥat (talk) 18:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

 On hold until 2020-11-25 --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:27, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2021-11-25. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Pooja Jadhav@mrwikisource

We asked for community approval to give admin and interface admin to them and the link is given above, they have been working for a while and definitely they could use advance rights here, as they have proven their worth with bot rights s:mr:User:Pooja Jadhav Bot they will do it with admin too. they have already applied for 2FA, I just corrected their 2FA request. thanks QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 17:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

@Pooja Jadhav:  On hold please enable 2FA authentication before we can promote you to interface administrator. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:51, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

@Pooja Jadhav: Sorry, just granted you sysop flag, so you should be able to do it from your preferences ar mr.wikisource. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 13:26, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Yes I have enabled 2FA,Thank and Regards--Pooja Jadhav (talk) 05:13, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2021-05-27. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 08:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. QueerEcofeminist [they/them/their] 15:28, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Roy17@gan.wikipedia

I would like to continue caretake this wiki. Thank you!--Roy17 (talk) 12:58, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2021-11-27. --Sotiale (talk) 13:05, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Tmv@ja.wikivoyage

I want to develop the newly created JAWY. I am active. I feel threatened by the fact that there are fewer and fewer Wikivoyage administrators. The community has agreed to let me be an administrator, please refer to the link above. I would appreciate an extension of my admin rights.--Tmv (talk) 07:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2021-05-28. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:23, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Joalpe@pt.wikiversity

I have been granted temporary sysop flags on wikiversity three times (six months, one year, two years). I am now requesting a permanent flag. Thanks. Joalpe (talk) 01:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Done. RadiX∞ 02:54, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Đức Anh@vi.wikibooks

Sysop for 12 months. Đức Anh (talk) 02:54, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

@Đức Anh:  Granted for 6 months to expire on 2021-05-29. According to steward guidelines, there was not enough votes for a 12-months long adminship. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Satirdan kahraman@tr.wikisource

Done Ruslik (talk) 20:48, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

H78c67c@yuewiktionary

See above. 2FA enabled. H78c67c (talk) 00:44, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

 On hold until 14 November 2020 Ruslik (talk) 20:30, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Af420@ps.wikipedia

Hello, I have been administrating at Pashto Wikipedia since 2016, and am currently the only administrator there. I always work on MediaWiki:common.js, to change things more into Pashto, some Special Gadgets such as the MediaWiki:common.css really needs to be fully changed to Pashto. Could I please get the right to do that? :))

Please, enable 2FA. Ruslik (talk) 14:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: Sorry for being late, have done that now:)) — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Af420 (talk)

@Af420: 2FA is now enabled, however, this voting seems to be from October 2019. Please start a new one, asking for the interface administrator flag. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:30, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Putting  On hold until new discussion finishes. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:31, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Not done as there wasn't any update. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:30, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Xorasan@diq.wikipedia

I'm requesting interface administrative access to edit some proofreading and text editor gadgets that are not working anymore, and clean the obsolete configurations in Common.js and Common.css. Xorasan (talk) 07:43, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Fixed the formatting. -- CptViraj (talk) 08:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

 On hold until 2020-11-26 --Martin Urbanec (talk) 10:54, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

@Xorasan: Hello, before we can eventually promote you to an interface administrator, could you please enable H:2FA authentication? I just allowed you to do so. Thanks, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:53, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

I can do, but my community rejeckted my request. What we do now, I don't know. If you do for some month, I can try. Xorasan (talk) 19:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Not done Right, I just realized I forgot to ask you for 2FA when posting my first on hold comment, and didn't look at the request again. Closing as not done then. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:29, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Tmv@ja.wikivoyage

I took the agreement to continue as interface administrator from the community. Thank you!--Tmv (talk) 07:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2021-05-28. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Joalpe@pt.wikiversity

As above: I have been granted temporary sysop flags on wikiversity three times (six months, one year, two years). I am now requesting a permanent flag. Thanks. --Joalpe (talk) 01:27, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Done. RadiX∞ 02:54, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Érico@ptwiki

Érico was re-elected for another term as checkuser. Please renew his permission. Even though it is a mandate with a fixed term, permission must be granted permanently. Regards, Rafael ^{(stanglavine) msg} 00:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Done. --Sotiale (talk) 02:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

nettadi@hewiki

— The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nettadi (talk) 16:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

 On hold until nettadi signed the confidentiality agreement. Email with instructions sent. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:15, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Done Rights granted. @Trijnstel: Can you do the list and wiki, please? Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 09:25, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Done. Trijnstel_talk 10:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Andriy.v@ukwiki

Please grant user CU rights. For ukwiki ArbCom, Base (talk) 14:05, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

 On hold until confidentiality agreement is signed, email with instructions sent. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Done Agreement was signed, on-wiki rights granted. @Trijnstel: Can you do the wiki/list stuff, please? I'll PM you their email at IRC. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 07:01, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Done. Trijnstel_talk 09:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Goo3@ukwiki

Please grant user CU rights. For ukwiki ArbCom, Base (talk) 14:05, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

 On hold until confidentiality agreement is signed. Email with instructions sent. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Done. Trijnstel_talk 19:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Hoo man@wikidatawiki

This user has made fewer than the required 5 admin actions in the last 6 months. Please remove sysop. Rschen7754 01:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Done--Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 16:31, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Yann@en.wikisource

Yann has failed annual reconfirmation due to inactivity. Please remove administrator bit. Thanks, Hesperian 22:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for their service. —Thanks for the fish! ^{talk•contribs} 22:13, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Lucien_leGrey@eswiki

Please remove his sysop and bureaucrat rights. Lucien leGrey has less than 50 admin logs in last 2 years (9 + 22), and his account does not satisfy with local policy. Thanks. -- Leoncastro (talk) 21:39, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Done @Leoncastro: I see this user is also an oversighter. Is there a policy that makes adminship a requirement for be an oversighter? Also ping MarcoAurelio --Martin Urbanec (talk) 03:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Our local policy, remains silent about this particular. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Nirmos@sv.wikipedia

It is one year since Nirmos was elected to administrator, so it is time to do a new election, but Nirmos has not answered the question concerning a new nomination, so no new election has taken place. Svensson1 (talk) 12:45, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

@Svensson1: Could you please link the local policy regarding the access removal. --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 16:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Here. Svensson1 (talk) 11:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Svensson1, Nirmos, Done. Please note that I have also removed the Interface administrator flag. Swedish Wikipedia policy on IAs does not have a requirement for IAs to be administrators, so normally I would not do this, but what also comes in play is the 2FA requirement imposed on IAs by WMF. You are free to reïnstate the flag once the user confirms they will enable 2FA once it is granted. --Base (talk) 09:35, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

בריאן@he.wikipedia

Please remove my CheckUser Permissions. Thanks, בריאן (talk) 05:31, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions --Martin Urbanec (talk) 14:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Done Matanya (talk) 07:33, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Hercule@wuu.wikipedia

Hercule is inactive for one year, and his admin rights should be removed. --Lt2818 (talk) 03:46, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Done @Hercule: Thank you for your service. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 07:17, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

MatthijsWiki@nl.wikipedia

Please remove my moderator rights. MatthijsWiki (talk) 10:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

 On hold for one day per our standard resignation procedure. MatthijsWiki, you are free to withdraw this request at any point until it is completed. --Base (talk) 10:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

@MatthijsWiki: your flag has been removed. Thanks for your past work. einsbor _talk 10:29, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Sahehco@fawiki

Inactive for 1 year (note: I didn't check the CU logs). Please remove CU. Rschen7754 01:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

The last check was three years ago. Ruslik (talk) 20:31, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Done Per global CU policy. @Trijnstel: Can you do the list, please? --Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:45, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Late, but Done. Trijnstel_talk 18:36, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

Dimitrij Kasev@it.wikipedia

Inactive. --Dimitrij Kášëv 00:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

 On hold for one day. Dimitrij Kasev, you are free to withdraw this request at any point until it is completed. --Base (talk) 16:44, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

@Dimitrij Kasev:, your flag has been removed. einsbor _talk 08:41, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

VictorAnyakin@ukwiki

Please remove user's CU rights. For ukwiki ArbCom, Base (talk) 13:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Done Revoked. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Mutante@mediawiki

Please remove Mutante's adminship, per their request --DannyS712 (talk) 16:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Usual  On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. — regards, Revi 16:57, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Done. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 09:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Vodomar@hrwiki

He is blocking users who supported the RFC.^[6][7] and wheel warring with Ivi104 to ensure that outcome. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 23:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Done. this and this is a clear wheel war. — regards, Revi 00:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Do not repeat a reversed administrative action when you know that another administrator opposes it. Do not continue a chain of administrative reversals without discussion. Resolve administrative disputes by discussion.

— en:WP:WHEEL

I am leaving the block that caused the wheel war intact. There are other local admins, so they should be able to solve it their way. — regards, Revi 00:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Remove GRN for Wong128hk

The user hasn't made any renames in last 1 year, their last rename was on 19 November 2019 11:52 AM (UTC). Per the policy, their right should be removed. CC: Wong128hk. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 11:55, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Done @Wong128hk: Thank you for your service. @Trijnstel: Can you alter the list, please? Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:10, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Done. Trijnstel_talk 11:43, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

Haakon K@nowikipedia

User was not reelected for another period at the biannual reelection. Please remove admin access. Haros (talk) 23:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Done--Sakretsu (炸裂) 23:29, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Andreas Kolle@nowikipedia

User did not want another period at the biannual reelection. Please remove admin access. Haros (talk) 23:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Done--Sakretsu (炸裂) 23:29, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Toreau@nowikipedia

User was not reelected for another period at the biannual reelection. Please remove admin access. Haros (talk) 23:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Done--Sakretsu (炸裂) 23:29, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Zhxy 519@zh.wikisource

Please permanently remove the adminship. The primary reason is emergency de-sysoping. His failure to avoid the conflict of interest on 2020-10-15 to delete and forever protect 3 pages, without publicly consulting other sysops nor evident sincerity to redress the issue, causes ongoing indefinite unrest in the community.

The secondary reason is the voting discussion. As the time limit is 14 days to vote about adminship, 14 days after 2020-10-15 starting the vote without enough local policies about voting eligibility nor passing threshold, etc, on 2020-10-29, I questioned if the consensus has been built to remove with 6 supports, 5 oppositions, and 3 being neutral [8], and on the same day Midleading as my fellow sysop advised temporarily keeping Zhxy 519's adminship [9].

Yet many late votes keep coming to remove, and s:zh:User:Patlabor Ingram kept talking too harshly, especially after 2020-10-29. On 2020-11-03, Midleading once again proposed stopping the vote [10]. Yet Patlabor Ingram and s:zh:User:Longway22 would keep pushing their propaganda and think that only removing Zhxy 519 will be acceptable.

I really do not want to publicly suspect anyone as meatpuppet or manipulating the vote. Having a stalemate and considering Stewards policy#Don't override consensus, please carefully remove the adminship while we have too few active users and our consensus may not be valid. The vote has too many flaws. Yet Zhxy 519's own actions may still warrant emergency removal due to lack of trust.Jusjih (talk) 19:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

As Jusjih said, he or she is facing harsh words from some users. However the discussion itself finished without consensus in 14 days and sysops should rather deal with w:WP:POINT behaviors as Jusjih mentioned. And I didn't have a chance of advanced communication, only Chinese-style propaganda public trial. I sincerely ask you to reject Jusjih's request, as just a personal decision under pressure (Patlabor Ingram and others claim many times they don't trust Jusjih and even de-adminship of himself in the same page) also "without publicly consulting other sysops".--Zhxy 519 (talk) 20:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

@Zhxy 519: Due to your several blocked logs on zhwiki, I see no reason why your permission can't be removed, or why don't you just request self-removal? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:06, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Please note that this is one example of those typical harsh words, both myself and Jusjih are facing.--Zhxy 519 (talk) 00:44, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Although I am glad Jusjih has filed the request from the community consensus, the Stewards should keep in mind this file haven't told all the truth of communities' discussion as Jusjih also by Zhxy 519's side.Patlabor Ingram and I ARE two independent member of community with no connection of interests，the only thing bring we and other members to the side against Zhxy 519 is official misconduct，with Jusjih being censors of special interest in wiki programs. The consensus of community is clear that there are no more

credibility in the power of Zhxy 519 manipulating the policy in it's own interest.Zhxy 519 couldn't face the questions either Patlabor Ingram or I bring up，and Jusjih had been middleman by Zhxy 519's side for days with agenda blocking any decision of community build up.So for stop the cheating and situation go worse， the Stewards should make an emergency removal as the local community consensus gained.Thanks for reading.——Longway22 (talk) 04:16, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

I have never been by Zhxy 519's side. I always value procedural justice. s:zh:User:Midleading questioned both Zhxy 519 and the process, thus voting to be neutral on 2020-10-19. Midleading already advised on 2020-10-29 to provisionally keep Zhxy 519 for no consensus. Yet Patlabor Ingram made excessive point to reverse my disqualifying Snaketong while voting late as the first edit on Chinese Wikisource. Then during the late period beyond 2020-10-29, both Patlabor Ingram and Longway22 made excessive points to manipulate the discussion.

Thus I file this primarily due to Zhxy 519 indefinitely protecting 3 pages without publicly asking other sysops first. It would even last beyond the United States non-acceptance of the rule of the shorter term until any syspo changes it. The flawed discussion with both Patlabor Ingram and Longway2 making excessive points should be considered incidentally advisory, but talks beyond 2020-10-29 should not be seriously considered.--Jusjih (talk) 22:54, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

OK,

1. I fail to see any emergency desysop procedure reason: usually either "compromised account" or "wheel-warring with other admins". Failure to avoid CoI is not an emergency-desysop reason by itself. "Lack of trust" is something zhwikisource community need to deal with themselves.
2. If there is no apparent consensus to remove the user, why should we desysop him? Under what policy? (Correct me if they passed the desysop threshold, but Jusjih's initial comment seem to suggest it did not pass)

— regards, Revi 16:56, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. We did not have a clear policy on how to desysop, like the threshold, when s:zh:Patlabor Ingram started and then manipulated the de-sysoping discussion so harshly.--Jusjih (talk) 04:58, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

As I said, I don't see this as emergency desysop-able reason (compare this with Vodomar@hrwiki), and then if there's no clear consensus to demote the user, I don't see why the permission need to be removed, unless the user is resigning. 6 to 5 is not really a clear consensus to me. — regards, Revi 00:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

As Steward_requests/Checkuser has shown clearing the Commuities'name， the outsider should notice Jusjih and Zhxy 519 also holding the problem "Lack of trust" to mulityusers and code of wikiprogram. No local policy could protect the Commuity daily works as our memebers being and facing account lockout at arbitrarily，as Jusjih setting new policy to save their ass talking like "procedural justice",and contiue threatening to block users who hold different opinions.The voting coludn't replace discussion as the code said，and well-founded conclusion gained on table that impeached AD didn't abide by the code and wouldn't change. This is indeed a reason for emergency removal procedure and that was clearly gained in the local community consensus.——Longway22 (talk) 10:53, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Indeed, there was a possible threat([11])that Jusjih claims that Patlabor Ingram POINT for not withdrawing the accusations to Zhxy 519 and warn Patlabor Ingram.It worsens the situation as making Patlabor Ingram and other feel that they are threatened.----Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 13:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

I don't think this qualifies for the "emergency" desysop, nor the community discussion desysop. Please go back to zhwikisource and get a clear consensus. Thank you. — regards, Revi 18:15, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Vigorous action@ja.wikisource

This user has no actions 2 years ago.(last action on jawikisource:2018-02-07 13:02(UTC)) Please remove sysop rights according to the rules of the Japanese Wikisource. Thanks.--Sakoppi (talk) 13:19, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Done--Sakretsu (炸裂) 15:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Wulfson@ru.wikipedia.org

For personal reasons, I kindly ask you to remove my checkuser flag. Wulfson (talk) 13:00, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Moved here from #CheckUser access. -- CptViraj (talk) 13:07, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. Let us know if you change your mind--Sakretsu (炸裂) 13:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Wulfson (talk) 16:24, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Done--Sakretsu (炸裂) 13:13, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Also removed from cu-wiki/list. RadiX∞ 14:20, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Vorlod@frwikiquote

Hi, I don't have time to contribute. Please remove my sysop flag. Many thanks. Vorlod (talk) 10:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. Let us know if you change your mind--Sakretsu (炸裂) 11:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Done--Sakretsu (炸裂) 13:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

0x010C and Jean-Christophe BENOIST@fr.wikipedia

Dear stewards,

I'm one of the nominators on frwiki. The community designated us to appoint and remove CU and OS rights. The committee has taken his decision for November 2020, and we need to remove the CU rights of 0x010C (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA) and Jean-Christophe BENOIST (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA). Thanks for them for their service, and thanks to the stewards for the action!

Kvardek du (talk) 21:06, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

@Kvardek du: Can you please link us to a page when the nominators committee was elected, so I can verify the committee was elected with arbcom-like criteria? Thanks, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

@Martin Urbanec: here it is! Kvardek du (talk) 12:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Done The committee was elected through ArbCom-like criteria, and as such, I've removed the user's CU permission. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:27, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Nothere@de.wikipedia.org

due to local inactivity policy, user is inactive for > 1 year, he was informed about the upcoming removal of sysop rights 90 days ago. --Funkruf (talk) 23:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Done, thanks for their service. Linedwell ^[talk] 08:11, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

MikaelF@ku.wikipedia

--MikaelF (talk) 18:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions --Wim b 20:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Done Thank you for your service. Sincerely, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:02, 30 November 2020 (UTC)