Steward requests/Permissions/2021-02

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in February 2021, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

bennylin@jvwikt

I'm already long-term sysops in multiple projects such as id.wikipedia and id.wikt. I'm requesting a permanent adminship in jv.wikt. If you're just gonna give a temp admin, then don't bother. ✒ Bennylin 11:38, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Steward note: This is also a request for int. adminship. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:19, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

 On hold until 2020-10-22 @Bennylin: Per the guidelines, 5+ voters who are an active participant of the project are necessary for a permanent adminship to be granted. Right now, in your case, only two persons with more than 50 edits at jv.wikt voted. Per the guidelines, the adminship will be temporary (possibly for a year rather than 6 months, given you are apparently trusted at several projects), unless that changes before the voting finishes. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:53, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Apropo, is this a request only for interface adminship? Or do you want both flags (sysop and interface-admin)? --Martin Urbanec (talk) 19:57, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

Both flags please. ✒ Bennylin 00:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

@Bennylin: I granted one year temporary sysop for now. Please enable 2FA before I can give you interface adminship. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:28, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Bennylin, still waiting. --Base (talk) 11:32, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Done For adminship, Not done for interface adminship - still no 2FA enabled. I also revoked your idwiki interface adminship per WMF policy. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:20, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

(reopen case) I've enabled 2FA. Can you grant me interface admin both in jv.wikt and id.wiki back please? Thanks. ✒ Bennylin 15:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

@Bennylin:  Granted for 1 year to expire on 2021-10-30. same duration as your adminship To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 23:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Galessandroni@itwikiversity

Please assign the flag for 6 months. Regards. --Superpes15 (talk) 23:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. --Sotiale (talk) 06:49, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Sayonzei@zhwiktionary

Thanks. GnolizX (talk) 05:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2022-02-03. --Sotiale (talk) 06:57, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

User Anass_Sedrati@ary

Hello, I would like to extend my administrator status on the Moroccan Arabic Wikipedia (expired on October 31,2020). The activity is pretty low on the Wiki currently, and I would like to support the only active administrator (Reda) in administrative duties. There are 3 supportive votes for this application, including the only current active administrator. Thank you in advance for the support. Regards. -- Anass Sedrati (talk) 09:58, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2021-08-05. RadiX∞ 15:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

RockyMasum@bn.wikivoyage

Requesting for Administrator Rights. Local request was made a week ago; no objection there. Thanks in advance. Rocky Masum (talk) 03:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

@RockyMasum:  Granted for 6 months to expire on 2021-08-10. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Yasanto Lase@niawikipedia

I want to be an admin on Wikipedia Nias to advance the Nias language in the wiki project.Yasanto Lase (talk) 07:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

What reason was given in the opposing vote? Ruslik (talk) 21:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

he voted against because he thought I had said on the past that I was the only one who wrote well in Nias language, which is not true. Yasanto Lase (talk) 09:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Not done No consensus. Ruslik (talk) 18:34, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

AVSmalnad77@gomwikipedia

Requesting to be an admin on Goan Konkani Wikipedia. Thanks AVSmalnad77 ^talk 05:58, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2021-08-12. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 18:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Audreycious@eowikinews

Thank you! Aŭdrea (talk) 03:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2021-05-17. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 20:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Yivan000@tlwikibooks

Tagalog Wikibooks has a heck ton of cleanup and fixing to do, especially vandals. Admins, and even regular users are inactive. I requested to be admin to help fixing. 2 weeks have passed. Nothing. — 🍕 Yivan000 🍕 07:41, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2021-05-20. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Ruslik (talk) 08:04, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Фәрһад@ttwikipedia

--Ilnur efende (talk) 09:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

 On hold until 2021-02-17 --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2022-02-20. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:21, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Chelin@nap.wikisource

I'm an administrator on the Neapolitan Wikisource and my adminship will finish on 25 February. Please renew it, thank you :) --Chelin (talk) 10:51, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2022-02-20. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

LuciferianThomas@zh.wikiversity

5 supports (including a non-ACU) vs 0 opposition. Please kindly consider this request. Thank you. クオン·-{夢か……現なのか？}- 13:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Note that is for temp sysop, for perm sysop is 3 support, 2 oppose. Thank you. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

@Kuon.Haku: I thought we passed as policy that need users to have at least 10 edits to be eligible to vote, #3 seems to only have 6 edits. Can you check. Thanks a lot. Note they supports temp sysop but oppose perm sysop. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

yea, please note that 2 users clearly say that they oppose L to be a permanent admin. --Hamish 14:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes, as you said, #3 is a non-ACU. --クオン·-{夢か……現なのか？}- 17:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

So summary: For perm sysop: 3 supports, 1 oppose ; For temp sysop: 4 support, 0 oppose. Thanks Kuon.Haku for clarifying. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 Granted for 9 months to expire on 2021-11-22. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Sotiale (talk) 12:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you! LuciferianThomas．Talk 21:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Frank Geerlings, Caribiana & Ciell @pap.wikipedia

We've been working on the Papiamentu wiki for the past three months, and Frank and Caribiana are requesting to take over as admins on the pap.wikipedia. I would be happy to help and show them around the admin interface, so it would be helpful if I could get another three months of temporary rights on this wiki as well. We discussed this among the two working groups we have and nobody objects, neither in the calls we had nor in the Portal di komunidat (Village Pump) linked above. Ciell (talk) 22:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 On hold until 2021-02-25. --Sotiale (talk) 12:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2021-08-25. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 23:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Martin Urbanec, thank you for handling our request. Caribiana and Frank both speak the language and would be the admins that will stay on this wiki, per community support in the local Village Pump. Could they maybe get the right for undetermined/'indefinite'? Ciell (talk) 23:55, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

@Ciell Not now, sadly. I assigned six months per this guideline. I hope it makes sense. Best, Martin Urbanec (talk) 23:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Micael D.@ptwikinews

I was elected in 2018 and my flag was taken cause i was inactive, but now i'm returning again. Micael D. (talk) 11:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Please, open a new discussion. Ruslik (talk) 08:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

I see that n:pt:Wikinotícias:Pedidos de administração/Micael D./6 was started,  On hold until February 26. --Base (talk) 13:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

@Base: done. You can see that i was approved.

Done. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 22:26, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Սեւան Դանիէլեան Մկրեան@hywwiki

This user got lost in meta and accidentally made a request for local admin rights. See Meta:Requests for adminship/Սեւան Դանիէլեան Մկրեան --ZabeMath (talk) 19:05, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Copied:

My involvement with Western Armenian Wikipedia started on 2015 mainly in content and article creation, translations, edits and corrections. My mission is to preserve the Western Armenian language, history & culture and that by improving the Wikipedia platform and enhancing its outreach. The Western Armenian community collectively voted to make me an admin, you can find it here--Սեւան Դանիէլեան Մկրեան (talk) 17:35, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

--MF-W 19:07, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2022-02-26. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Rafael ^{(stanglavine) msg} 20:42, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Yasanto Lase@niawiktionary

I'm requesting to be an admin on Nias Wiktionary and Nias Wikipedia Yasanto Lase (talk) 01:03, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

 On hold till January 30. Yasanto Lase, please submit a separate request for Nias Wikipedia linking to the respective discussion. --Base (talk) 04:59, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Looks like the vote was carried out at wikt:nia:Special:Permalink/12361 instead. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 22:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

@Yasanto Lase:  Granted for 6 months to expire on 2021-08-26. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 22:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Slaia@niawiktionary

I am requesting adminship for all admin-related tasks on Nias Wiktionary after my administrator access ends on 12 Feb. Glad to see that a lot of progress has been done, but still a lot to do. Slaia (talk) 08:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

This could probably be granted together with #Yasanto Lase@niawiktionary above. Ping Base. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:12, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

@Slaia:  Granted for 6 months to expire on 2021-08-26. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 22:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Đức Anh@vi.wikibooks

I am an administrator in Vietnamese Wikibooks. I need interface administrator for 1-2 week to fix some bugs. I need urgently. Đức Anh (talk) 08:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

@Đức Anh: Not a steward, but you will need a link to discussion for interface admin, plus 2FA. Leaderboard (talk) 12:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Actually if they need it very urgently, and there isn't any time for discussion (i.e. time sensitive), they can post on SRM for a steward / GS to implement. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

@Đức Anh: As said above. There is currently no community discussion linked. We can't just promote people, we need to be sure the community is actually fine with the assignment. If you need just a few fixes done, feel free to request it at SRM, where it can be done by a steward or global sysop. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Not done No discussion linked, no promotion granted. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

3(MG)²@frwp

Hello ! On french wikipedia, nomination board decided to designate me check-user. I have already signed the confidentiality agreement. Best regards. 3(MG)² (talk) 17:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. Trijnstel_talk 17:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Mathis B@frwiki

Hi, frwiki nomination committee has decided to grant me as CU. I have already signed confidentiality agreement. Thanks, Mathis B (talk) 11:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

The flag has been granted, @Trijnstel:, could you please do your usual magic with IRC, etc? einsbor _talk 13:59, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, Trijnstel already sent me an email. Mathis B (talk) 14:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Will do. Trijnstel_talk 17:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Durifon@FR:WP

I would like the stewards to grant me the CheckUser access in WP:FR. I signed the confidentiality agreement but I made a mistake and signed it as Durifon and not under my real identity, now I can't sign it again. Is it a problem? What can I do?Durifon (talk) 06:09, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

JSutherland, NahidSultan, is this something you can help with? --Base (talk) 12:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I've added Durifon's signature. Thanks.– NahidSultan (WMF) (talk) 16:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. Trijnstel_talk 17:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

David Wadie Fisher-Freberg@id.wikipedia

The community of Indonesian Wikipedia has agreed to give David Wadie Fisher-Freberg the status of checkuser (bahasa Indonesia: pemeriksa). Regards. Medelam (talk) 01:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 On hold pending on the candidate's signature of the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information (see instructions) and Wikimedia Foundation confirmation of the same. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I have signed both general and OTRS agreements. Please re-check. Thanks. dwf² ✉ 12:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Not yet noted under Access to nonpublic personal data policy/Noticeboard. Let's wait for a while. Best, Martin Urbanec (talk) 15:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

@David Wadie Fisher-Freberg: I've just send an email to you. Please take a look & reply. Thank you. Trijnstel_talk 14:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

@Trijnstel: replied, thanks. dwf² ✉ 14:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

@JSutherland (WMF): Could you please look for the signature of David Wadie Fisher-Freberg? Trijnstel_talk 14:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. @Trijnstel: ping for the rest of steps. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:42, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. Trijnstel_talk 08:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

David Wadie Fisher-Freberg@id.wikipedia

The community of Indonesian Wikipedia has agreed to give David Wadie Fisher-Freberg the status of oversight (bahasa Indonesia: pengawas). Regards. Medelam (talk) 01:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 On hold pending on the candidate's signature of the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information (see instructions) and Wikimedia Foundation confirmation of the same. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Per above, I have signed both general and OTRS agreements. Please re-check. Thanks. dwf² ✉ 12:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Done —MarcoAurelio (talk) 21:46, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Editor_D.S@ptwiki

Editor D.S has been approved for being oversighter at pt.wiki with 96% of favorable votes. Please assign the permission, he has already signed the confidentially agreement EVinente (talk) 21:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. Trijnstel_talk 09:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Matanb@sv.wikipedia

It is one year since Matanb was elected to administrator, so it is time to do a new election, but Matanb does not want to continue as administrator. Svensson1 (talk) 23:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Done. RadiX∞ 04:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Hallabro@sv.wikipedia

It is one year since Hallabro was elected to administrator, so it is time to do a new election, but Hallabro does not want to continue as administrator. Svensson1 (talk) 23:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Done. RadiX∞ 04:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Teles@commons

Please, remove my admin rights on Commons. I have been an admin for a few years, but in these days I want to focus on Meta, crosswiki issues, and Portuguese Wikipedia. As I am not using it, should be removed. Thanks in advance.—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 23:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions Martin Urbanec (talk) 23:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Commons can remove admin rights now. --Rschen7754 02:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Indeed, so @Teles: please put this request locally on Commons, local 'crats can handle it, therefore stewards are not allowed to do so. einsbor _talk 08:07, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

@Rschen7754 and Einsbor: That’s new for me! Will ask there. Thanks!—Teles «Talk ˱_{C L @ S}˲» 14:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Krd@global

Please remove my stewardship as soon as practical, and please cancel my confirmation. Thank you. --Krd 17:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

:( — regards, Revi 17:29, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Eldad@hewiki

Please remove my bureaucrat rights on hewiki. Thanks. Eldad (talk) 08:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

On hold for 24h. einsbor _talk 08:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for your service. RadiX∞ 05:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Remove global sysop for Esteban16

My activity will decline for the following months. I may not be able to help as a GS in the short term, so it would be better to have my flag removed. It was a pleasure serving the global community for the last two years. If I become active again, I may consider re-applying for GS. Thank you :) Esteban16 (talk) 02:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions --Alaa :)..! 12:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Done, thank you for your work. RadiX∞ 15:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Umherirrender@dewiki

Please remove my sysop right/administrator access from dewiki. Thanks. Der Umherirrende (talk) 22:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

On hold for 24h per standard practice. einsbor _talk 07:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for your service. RadiX∞ 05:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Derbeth@plwikinews

Please remove my sysop rights. Derbeth (talk) 06:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

On hold for 24h per standard practice. einsbor _talk 07:01, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for your service. RadiX∞ 05:21, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Qydera@global

Please remove oathauth-tester group from this locked user. Regards --ZabeMath (talk) 20:44, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. RadiX∞ 21:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Remove global interface-editor for ~riley

Per above, I think is best to split into 2. @~riley: for notification. It seems that they didn't edit the interface for 6 months per above. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Done Indeed, no GIE actions in last six months. Permissions removed. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Remove global sysopship for ~riley

Today I looked at the activity of all global sysops in the cross-wiki activity tool. Riley's global sysop right should be removed. According to the inactivity rule on global sysop policy, global sysops can be directly removed if they don't use their rights for at least 6 months, except for projects where they are local administrators. According to the cross-wiki activity tool (see), the last log is at en.wikiversity see on June 19, 2020. Riley is local admin on commons, enwikiquote, meta; also enwikipedia and these wikis aren’t include for global sysop wiki set. The list below contains the last 5 wikis riley was active per cross-wiki activity tool. As far as I use this tool is correct generally, but it's worth checking again by stewards. Regards. --Uncitoyen^talk 13:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

@Uncitoyen Might want to check for GIE too. As GIE is also 6 months inactivity, sad to see the rights removed but these are high risk privs. Thanks for checking. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 17:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

@Camouflaged Mirage: It says that if they don't make edits about the interface for at least 6 months, their rights can be removed. Probably the expression mentioned for these edits are .js .css .json. These generally provide the interface of the site and users. I couldn't see such edits on commons, en.wikiquote, meta, en.wikipedia and wikidata. As the stewards know this situation better, they can handle this issue if possible. If possible, I can ping @Base: is active for permissions requests recently. --Uncitoyen^talk 19:16, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Just want to mention that I have seen the ping, but I am a bit busy right now and this one requires spending some time checking so cannot promise I can check this in timely manner.. --Base (talk) 16:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Why was not ~riley notified about this thread? Ruslik (talk) 20:45, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

@Ruslik0: Is it for global sysop or global interface-admin? The last 2 months, we've seen some global sysops removed by stewards out of notified are inactive over the past 6 months. --Uncitoyen^talk 20:50, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

I mean we don't have notification requirement as far as I know for inactivity for GS, inactivity section just put "Global sysops will automatically lose their access if in six months they've not used the respective rights outside of wikis on which they have local rights." Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

If the rights are removed without discussion then there is no need to notify. However if you start discussing a user then it is considered a common courtesy to notify the user. Ruslik (talk) 13:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Wiki	User page	Last edit	Last log action	Rights
commons	commons:User:~riley	2021-01-09 21:20	2021-01-07 04:53	(interface-admin, sysop, translationadmin)
enwikiquote	wikiquote:en:User:~riley	2020-12-17 19:21	2020-12-17 19:33	(interface-admin, sysop)
meta	User:~riley	2020-12-17 01:15	2020-12-17 01:15	(interface-admin, sysop, translationadmin)
enwikipedia	wikipedia:en:User:~riley	2020-06-22 15:55	2020-12-12 08:53	(accountcreator, autoreviewer, extendedconfirmed, extendedmover, filemover, reviewer, rollbacker)
enwikiversity	wikiversity:en:User:~riley	2020-04-08 23:03	2020-06-19 05:05

(discussion stalker) I ran some script some time ago and noticed ~riley was already close to losing it, so I ran it again and got the following output:

pihwiki	block	20200601080403
pihwiki	delete	20200601080404
hiwiktionary	delete	20200601080758
hifwiki	delete	20200608033347
hifwiki	delete	20200608033347
hifwiki	delete	20200608033347
tnwiki	delete	20200608041622
tnwiki	delete	20200608041624
tnwiki	delete	20200608041624
enwikiversity	block	20200619050527

Which means his last action was June 19th, 2020, so that's past the 6 month mark we have in the global sysop policy. I am not entirely sure about the notification requirement here, as I have had GS in the past and lost it automatically and only got the notification of the removal itself. --Wiki13 (talk) 21:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

@~riley: Since it doesn't appear they have been notified yet. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 10:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Per my comment above there isn't a need to notify as far as I can see, but good to ping too. Doesn't the application ping the users for such issues? Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

@Camouflaged Mirage: Yes, usually an application pings the users (if compiled correctly), it happened a few days ago with me :) --Superpes15 (talk) 11:00, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

In fact, even when you create this request, the notification goes away. Because on wiki projects, when I write users' names in deletion, block requests (seems like [[User:]], they reply immediately. As far as I have seen in the archives, there aren't notified for inactive global sysops. --Uncitoyen^talk 11:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

If the policy doesn't explicitly say it requires notification, it should not be required - and it leads to pointless actions just to keep the rights. --Rschen7754 19:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Done I removed riley's access based on the "crossactivity" tool and the outputs published above. I failed to find any sysop access outside of wikis where riley holds local access. Removed as per policy. Sincerely, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

@Trijnstel: Can you do the list honors, please? Thanks! Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 11:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. Trijnstel_talk 18:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

覇那@global

Please remove global-ipblock-exempt from this locked user. Regards --ZabeMath (talk) 21:55, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

removed. einsbor _talk 07:49, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Andrew Base@global

Please remove oathauth-tester group from this locked user. Regards --ZabeMath (talk) 15:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. RadiX∞ 16:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

remove global interface-editor Krenair@global

Today I checked all global interface editors except for WMF staffs. Here was given this right for 2 years for Krenair. Special:PermanentLink/19982579#Renew_global_interface_editor_for_Krenair. It seems to be the last interface edits on 13 June 2020 according to the cross activity and global contributions tools. commons:Special:Diff/425993359 It looks like it hasn't done any interface edits much more than last 6 months. (It is better checked again by stewards) The GIE states that rights who haven't done any interface edits for at last 6 months will be removed by their stewards. I wanted to present this situation for the stewards. Regards. --Uncitoyen^talk 08:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. RadiX∞ 18:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Superpes15@itwikiversity

I requested the temporary sysop flag to deal with the vandalism in the absence of other admins. As a new admin has recently been elected and the other inactive admin is active again, I no longer need the (temporary) flag and ask for it to be removed, thanks. Regards :) Superpes15 (talk) 15:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

On hold for 24h. RadiX�� 16:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Done thanks for your work, see you at the next shortage of admin on it.wv… ;) --Wim b 14:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

BubblySnow@global

Account locked. Please remove oathauth-tester. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 08:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. Trijnstel_talk 09:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Фильтр злоупотреблений@ttwiki

--Ilnur efende (talk) 09:43, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

(non steward comment) This is the abuse filter, which has sysop rights due to the system. --ZabeMath (talk) 09:46, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

@Ilnur efende: Hello. As @ZabeMath said, the account is a system user used by the AbuseFilter. It gets sysop permissions automatically. While I can remove them, the system will regrant sysop permissions to the account again at a later date (is this still the case Daimona Eaytoy?) Best regards. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

• Thank you, then there is no need to remove--Ilnur efende (talk) 11:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

@MarcoAurelio: The user would only be resysopped if 1) "block" is enabled on ttwiki, or 2) we'll need the account to perform some maintenance. However, 1) doesn't seem to be likely (given that there are no filters on ttwiki), and there are no maintenance tasks to do at this time. That said, the relevant task is T212268. --Daimona Eaytoy (talk) 13:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Not done No need to desysop a system account. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 17:09, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Marat-avgust@ttwiki

--Ilnur efende (talk) 09:43, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Done —MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Xqt@dewiki

Xqt has been elected Bürokrat on dewiki on 13. February 2019. He has to start a re-election after two Years. He did not start a re-election so please remove his rights. Thx --Itti (talk) 19:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC) (Bürokrat on dewiki)

Done Ruslik (talk) 06:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Kolyma@zhwiki

Kolyma has been inactive for more than six months and was notified of the removal a month ago. Per local policy, please remove their sysop flag. Thanks. Stang 05:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 06:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

impartial just (with out 2FA)@global

Request for removing GIPBE. Reason: No longer need it.--Impartial just (with out 2FA) (talk) 01:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Impartial just, Done, thanks for the update. --Base (talk) 02:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

impartial just@global

Request for removing GIPBE. Reason: No longer need it.--ℑ𝔪𝔭𝔞𝔯𝔱𝔦𝔞𝔩 𝔧𝔲𝔰𝔱🎙️ 01:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

impartial just, Done, thanks for the update. --Base (talk) 02:55, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

remove global renamer for Mr.Ajedrez@meta

According to the global renamer policy, the global renamers who haven't use rights (not done any renamer process) for the last 1 year can be removed by stewards. Mr.Ajedrez’s last renamer log is here [5] on 22 February 2020, 17.30 UTC. Regards. --Uncitoyen^talk 07:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Removed, einsbor _talk 08:47, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Pi zero@enwikibooks

Bureaucrats cannot remove admin rights here, and we've come to know that the heartbeat of this user has zero derivative unfortunately. Leaderboard (talk) 09:34, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

I apologise, I was not aware that this request was pre-emptively done already. Leaderboard (talk) 10:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I had asked on #wikimedia-stewards earlier today and was done by Tks4Fish.
acagastya 10:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Machaerus@nl.wikipedia

Removal of administrator access. According to nl.wikipedia policy, administrators lose their admin rights when their activity has fallen under the limit of 250 edits in 365 days. This is the case with user Machaerus since today. Apdency (talk) 18:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Done @Machaerus: Thank you for your service. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 18:42, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

multiple@uawikimedia

Please remove sysop and bureaucrat rights as this user is not a Board member of Wikimedia Ukraine any more. --TohaomgTohaomg (talk) 19:01, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Done -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:34, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

He:Wikisource - removal of SysOp and Beaurocrat priveleges for users no longer active

Hi

As discussed and voted on and agreed upon in the Miznon of He:Wikisource, I'd like to ask you to please remove the admistrative rights of the following users who have either not been active at all for the past 6 months or have had less than 15 content edits in the past year (the majority of them being inactive far beyond the limits above):

• יודא
• משתמש:Rotemliss
• משתמשת:אור שפירא
• משתמש:Inkbug
• משתמש:Effib
• עמרם
• ציון הלוי
• משתמש:Eitan96

please let me know if you require any further info from me. many thanks!--Roxette5 (talk) 20:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. Matanya (talk) 15:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Is this a new policy or just a vote? If it is a new policy it should be logged at Admin activity review/Local inactivity policies. --Rschen7754 19:03, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Rs, This is in fact a new policy, as voted upon. I will log it on the page you mentioned. thx.--Roxette5 (talk) 19:55, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

ZhuofanWu@gan.wikipedia

• Request for temporary Importer access.transwiki Importer access
• No support,no oppose,no comments.Zhuofan Wu^{Cien años de soledad} 07:29, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

   On hold until February 7th. In the meanwhile, ZhuofanWu, could you explain what do you want to import? Is there any way that transwiki import can be used rather than XML upload for your task? --Base (talk) 09:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

@Base:I`m very sorry for misunderstanding the policy.What I want to import is a lot of modules and templates.I think that I only need transwiki import access to do my work.Zhuofan Wu^{Cien años de soledad} 10:11, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

ZhuofanWu, no problem, in fact there is no policy as such, but XML import is a very sensitive permission as one is dealing with raw modifiable data there. Transwiki import is much safer to use, so we lean towards giving it instead whenever possible. Currently ganwiki is set up to support transwiki import from Wikimedia incubator only. I assume you have a few other import sources in mind (zhwiki? enwiki? meta? etc.). You need to decide on those by a vote and follow the instructions at Requesting wiki configuration changes. Here is an example ticket for requesting such change: phab:T260716. --Base (talk) 10:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Requesting wiki configuration changes in ganwiki will be a difficult task due to lack of active users.Anyway,thanks a lot,Base.Zhuofan Wu^{Cien años de soledad} 02:29, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

ZhuofanWu, it should not be difficult, basically the same principle as with permission votes applies — if no one has a good reason to oppose then it is approved, even if no one supports too. Import sources in particular are a very trivial change. --Base (talk) 07:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks,Base. I have already post a message on the village pump.Zhuofan Wu^{Cien años de soledad} 07:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

---

Base, I`ve withdrawn the proposal.Zhuofan Wu^{Cien años de soledad} 09:35, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Closed as withdrawn per above. — regards, Revi 17:36, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

JAn Dudík@cs.wikisource

Note I

sleeping local bureaucrat user:Danny_B :viz my notice written in November 2020 of a long-standing open application for administrator rights

Note II.

vote 1=yes ,vote 2=yes,vote 3=no,vote 4=no,vote 5=yes,vote 6=yes,vote 7=no,vote 8=yes, vote 9=yes

Rosičák (talk) 15:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

@Rosičák: what right are you request for? --Wim b 16:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

@Wim b: That request was for administrator rights on a local project. It should have been evaluated a long time ago. The local bureaucrat sabotages the allocation of rights over warnings. So I turned to a higher instance. I don't see another solution--Rosičák (talk) 18:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC).

Not done: also, does a request from 2 years ago make sense? if it matters, open a new vote and submit the request again. --Wim b 16:54, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

@Wim b: How should colleague Dudík proceed to be elected when colleague Danny_B refuses to close the application? Should she kneel before him?--Rosičák (talk) 18:47, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

@Rosičák: absolutely not, he should certainly not pray to him on his knees, but I don't understand how a community can wait 2 years. You could have asked for help 2 years ago earlier in my opinion, or open a problematic procedure for Danny_B if you thought it was right. I don't know how else to help you, and I would like to. --Wim b 19:34, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Cs.wikisource have small community, some people edits only once per many weeks. There is also problem, there are only two sys ops, one editet last in may and second makes one sysop action every few months and there are dozens of pages for deletions. And Some requests for other sys actions. New voting would take next few months... --JAn (talk) 21:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Helo, here is the list of the pages for delete (9 categories and 47 pages) and some waiting more than one year. Local bureucrat archived the question from Rosičák without answer. It`s weird, I mean. I support JAn (bureucrat on cs:wiki) like sysop on cs:wikisource Have a nice day--F.ponizil (talk) 23:25, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

@F.ponizil It's not about JAn personally. Any request seeking promotion after two years would be declined. Please let @JAn Dudík start a new RfA, wait a week or two, and ask us again, and/or start a problematic procedure for the bureaucrat, if the community wishes so.

Note: I would've helped cswikisource's speedy category if cswikisource allowed global sysops. I proposed that some time ago, and it was declined, even that the admins are mostly inactive.

Sincerely, Martin Urbanec (talk) 00:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

OK, if this is opinion of more than one steward... I'll make new RfA. JAn Dudík (talk) 10:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Several users@smnwiki

A vote was started on January 16th about who should be the administrators on the Inari Sámi Wikipedia (smnwiki), which resulted in the following five users being elected:

• Muotâ (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Yupik (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Seipinne (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• SaMSUoM (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Trondtr (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)

The following two users were also elected. However, they did not confirm their interest in continuing as administrators on the Inari Sámi Wikipedia.

• Mlolthuis (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)
• Jon Harald Søby (talk • edits • logs • UserRights • activity • CentralAuth • email • verify 2FA)

--Muotâ (talk) 11:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Done Promoted the users who confirmed their interest. Best, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

30000lightyears@meta

This user lives in Chinese mainland, therefore must use the proxy to be able to visit and edit Wikipedia, he has been trusted in the Zhwiki local and obtained other rights, and contacted me on off-wiki, hoping to get this authority. Please authorize, thanks, 勇猛な貓BureibuNeko 06:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Not done. @勇猛な貓: The user shall request the exemption himself via email to one of the local checkusers (see our local guideline). I also note that 30000lightyears has a global IP block exemption granted already so he should be able to bypass global blocks. Regards, —MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:58, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

@MarcoAurelio: Yes, he once sent this email, but no one dealt with it.(So he got in touch with me.) Secondly, in fact, he couldn't. And, up to now, I still don't see that he has this right (local IPBE). Regards,勇猛な貓BureibuNeko 14:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

@BureibuNeko Who did he send the email to? Just wondering. And I might be able to help in translation if needed even though I am not a meta CU. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

@Camouflaged Mirage: Just a moment ago, I confirmed with him that he sent it to“ stewards@wikimedia.org ". Thank you for your help! Regards, --勇猛な貓BureibuNeko 14:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

@BureibuNeko For meta local IPBE, please send via email to one of our checkusers, not the steward mailing list. Special:ListUsers/checkuser. If they have difficulty writing in English, please ask them email me via meta interface and I will do the necessary forwarding. Thanks much. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:17, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

@Camouflaged Mirage: OK, I see. I'll ask him to resend the email. Thank you! --勇猛な貓BureibuNeko 14:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

No problems, happy to help out @BureibuNeko Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 14:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Nguyenhai314@viwikibooks

Eliminator for 1 year, please! Đức Anh (talk) 03:42, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 21:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)