Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Yotcmdr

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yotcmdr[change source]

Yotcmdr (talk · contribs)

Ended: December 7 2008

Result: Promoted (15 support, 0 Oppose)

I, Shapiros10, would like to present Yotcmdr for adminship. Yotcmdr has made over 2,000 edits in his 3 months here at Simple, with a whopping 68% in the article namespace. Yotcmdr is an excellent vandalism reverter, and is an active participant at WP:ST. He is also a fine contributor to France-related subjects, and has created more than 600 articles. In addition, he has over 60 QD tags, over 10 reports to WP:AIV and contributes regularly to T:DYK. In conclusion, I think Yotcmdr would make an excellent administrator on the Simple English Wikipedia. Shapiros10 Flap the Yap 01:01, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate's acceptance: I accept this nomination, which I am very honored of. Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 12:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support[change source]

  1. Why not. I don't see any self-inflicted GSWs in your lower extremities. -- Creol(talk) 12:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    How do you know that, Creol. You checkusered their legs, didn't you? ^_^ ס (Samekh) Talk 12:46, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Can't have any admins with thigh pain, eh?
    Lower than thighs. --Gwib -(talk)- 12:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Nom Support Shapiros10 Flap the Yap 12:47, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Strong support - Very worth candidate, will not abuse the tools. BG7even 12:53, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support Candidate is a great editor, and will be able to continue as a helpful admin. Good luck! PeterSymonds (talk) 16:15, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support per an excellent, short, but to-the-point nomination. -- American Eagle (talk) 18:52, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support – Sure. Great vandalism fighter. Had to use WP:VIP numerous times. – RyanCross (talk) 19:13, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Strong support - Will not abuse tools. Kennedy (talk) 20:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Support - He's a hardworking guy who makes a lot of high-quality contribs and a very active vandal fighter. He fills the holes in SEWP and if it were not for him being here, it would be overrun with misinformation and sticky graffiti. If he does get promoted, I'll look up to him as a role model. - Æåm Fætsøn /ˈaɪæm ˈfætsən/ 05:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Weakly support --I'm changing my vote to "weakly support" per above but I still think he could work on the stuff I mentioned below.--  CM16  22:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Support - Fine candidate. ס (Samekh) Talk 22:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Support - per above. Chenzw  Talk  02:51, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Support - Not much I can say that hasn't been already. -Djsasso (talk) 19:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Support - Great vandal fighter and editor and will be a great addition to the admin team. MathCool10 04:43, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Strong support I think this user'll make a Really good admin. Tharnton345 08:10, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Strong support This User look very experienced. I feel Very confident that you won't abuse the tools. Good Luck Daisy (talk) 11:53, 5 December 2008 (UTC)This was not counted as a support because the account was created after the RfA had begun. -- Creol(talk) 07:35, 7 December 2008 (UTC) [reply]
    User registered on 1 December. Majorly talk 14:28, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Support Good editor. Will greatly benefit the project with the tools. Good luck, Malinaccier (talk) (Rev) 00:37, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose[change source]

Weakly oppose - Yes this is a wonderful user...but I don't think he's ready just yet. He still has a few things he can improve on. Can't name them off the top of my head. Although one I can is policies. Maybe in a month or two months time. Sorry, man, but you ARE a wonderful user.--  CM16  05:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC) (Changing to Support--  CM16  22:15, 1 December 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Comments[change source]