W-Arly-Pendjari Complex

Benin, Burkina Faso, Niger
Factors affecting the property in 2024*
  • Illegal activities
  • Livestock farming / grazing of domesticated animals
  • Management systems/ management plan
  • Terrorism
Factors* affecting the property identified in previous reports
  • Phosphate mining project (issue resolved)
  • Dam project (issue resolved)
  • Lack of monitoring of the implementation of the Management Plan
  • Transhumance
  • Insecurity
  • Poaching
UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Funds until 2024

Total amount granted:  USD 40,000 from the Rapid Response Facility (RRF) in 2022;

USD 247,870 from the Government of Norway in 2020-2024

International Assistance: requests for the property until 2024
Requests approved: 5 (from 1997-2012)
Total amount approved : 135,440 USD
Missions to the property until 2024**

UNESCO/RAMSAR mission, 8-22 May 2004; World Heritage Centre reactive monitoring mission, 17-22 January 2022.

Conservation issues presented to the World Heritage Committee in 2024

On 29 January 2024, the States Parties of Benin, Burkina Faso and Niger submitted a joint report on the state of conservation of the property, available at https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/749/documents, providing the following information:

  • The managers of the property in the three States Parties have undertaken a number of initiatives since 2022 to re-establish their control over the entire area;
  • In addition to a biannual camera trap campaign to monitor cheetahs and leopards, pending completion of the biannual aerial inventory of the property, envisaged for 2023 but postponed to 2024 due to the sociopolitical situation in the region, drones and joint patrols with the Defence and Security Forces are continually collecting information on the state of the fauna;
  • Significant progress has been made in implementing the recommendations of the 2022 Reactive Monitoring mission, notably including: the adoption of plans for securing, rehabilitating and developing the Arly and W national parks (Burkina Faso); the systematization of environmental and social impact assessments (ESIAs) for infrastructure construction projects, inside and on the periphery of the property; the setting up of a special monitoring programme for damalisks, hartebeest and Defassa waterbucks in the Benin component of the property; the Multi-hazard Early Warning System, which is in the process of becoming operational; submission of the topographical map of the property and its buffer zone to the World Heritage Centre; and the marking out of transhumance corridors in Benin;
  • Several initiatives have been undertaken to strengthen the sustainable financing mechanism for the property, including: development of the Resource Mobilization Strategy for the Climate Change Adaptation Plan (PACC-WAP), consolidation of the West African Savannah Foundation (WASF) and financial support from the German Development Bank (KFW) and the French Development Agency (AFD);
  • Following the meeting of the Council of Ministers (June 2023), an annual allocation of 25 million CFA francs (approximately $40,000) per country was agreed, as from 2024, for operation of the Executive Secretariat of the W-Arly-Pendjari Complex (SE-WAP), whose headquarters are hosted by Niger;
  • An Adapt-WAP Green Credit Revolving Fund has been set up to diversify income-generating activities for communities living near the property;
  • The State Party of Niger will resubmit a request for a minor modification to the boundaries of the property in the Niger component in January 2024. A request for a minor modification to the boundaries of the property in the Benin component will be submitted very shortly;
  • A number of projects in and around the property, at various stages of completion, have been the subject of ESIAs: the construction of an oil pipeline between Niger and Benin, improvements to and asphalting of the Banikoara – Kérémou – Burkina Faso border road and rehabilitation of the Tapoa living accommodation in the W Park (Niger);
  • In their correspondence of 21 November 2023 and 25 January 2024, the States Parties invited the World Heritage Centre and IUCN to carry out the joint Reactive Monitoring mission at the property in February 2024.

On 1 February 2024, the State Party of Niger submitted a proposal for a minor modification to the boundaries of the property to create a buffer zone, with the support of Burkina Faso and Benin.

On 2 February 2024, the World Heritage Centre contacted the United Nations security service in Burkina Faso to check the feasibility of the itineraries proposed by the States Parties and any security requirements for the effective organization of the mission. On 9 April 2024, the United Nations Security Officer in Burkina Faso informed the World Heritage Centre that, in view of the situation currently prevailing in the W Park, he would only be able to give a precise answer after contacting the military authorities.
Analysis and Conclusion by World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies in 2024

The security situation in the area known as the three borders, which straddles the property, remains very precarious due to the presence of armed groups. Added to this security challenge are other difficulties linked to the sociopolitical situation in the region and in Niger in particular.

Violent events persist both within and around the property, despite the fact that the States Parties have undertaken several initiatives at local, national and sub-regional level to re-establish effective control over the entire property and its area of influence. It is recommended that the Committee deplore the continuing insecurity in the region and encourage the States Parties to continue their efforts to restore security and provide accurate data on the coverage of surveillance of the property, as well as the effectiveness thereof.

The considerable efforts made by the States Parties and the significant progress made in implementing the recommendations of the 2022 Reactive Monitoring mission are appreciated. Although it is too early to assess the impact of implementation of these recommendations, the Committee should welcome this progress and encourage the States Parties to maintain the momentum towards full implementation of the recommendations.

Although aerial surveys have continued, it is recommended that the request be reiterated to carry out regular aerial surveys of all components of the property using the same methodology, so that the results can be compared and wildlife population trends identified. 

Recalling the observation of the 2022 mission that the antelope translocation project had been implemented despite the reservations of the Antelope Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC), it is recommended that further information be sought concerning this project and the additional translocation project planned between the Pendjari and W National Parks in Benin reported by the 2022 mission and that all species translocation projects be carried out in accordance with international standards.

The significant progress made by the States Parties in operationalizing the SE-WAP is to be congratulated. It is recommended that governance bodies continue to be set up and that more technical and financial resources be made available to ensure that they operate optimally in the long term. 

The preliminary ESIA report on the oil pipeline project crossing 38 km of the buffer zone of the Benin component of the property reveals a number of significant negative impacts on fauna and flora at all stages of the project and along its entire route. However, an assessment of the draft ESIA report by IUCN shows that there has been no specific analysis of the potential negative impacts of the project on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) attributes of the property. It is regrettable that the ESIA for this project was not submitted to the World Heritage Centre before the final decision was taken to implement it, in accordance with the Guidelines. Noting that the project has already been in the operational phase since November 2023, it is recommended that the States Parties provide detailed information on the route of the oil pipeline in relation to the property, as well as on the measures taken to avoid any potential negative impact and the measures taken in anticipation of possible accidents in order to avoid pollution damage and fires. 

It is noted with concern that the project to asphalt the Banikoara – Kérémou – Burkina Faso border road passes through the W Park in Benin and that this existing route was chosen over an alternative further from the property for economic reasons. The IUCN notes that the environmental assessment report does not present alternative routes and concludes that the project presents potential significant adverse impacts on soil, vegetation, groundwater and air along the route of the project; also that the cumulative impacts of asphalting the road on the characteristics of the OUV have not been sufficiently taken into account. These include collisions with wildlife, increased poaching, noise pollution and fragmentation of wildlife habitats, as well as potential impacts on the Burkina Faso component of the property, which is contiguous with the W Park in Benin. Noting that the project is already in the implementation phase, it is recommended that a halt to the work be requested and that the States Parties provide the World Heritage Centre with detailed information concerning the measures taken to avoid any negative impact on the property’s OUV before any decision be taken to continue implementing the project.

It is noted that the request has been submitted for a minor modification to the boundaries of the property in the Niger component and that a similar initiative is under way to modify the boundaries of the property in the Benin component in order to strengthen its protection. It is positive that further progress has been made to strengthen the property’s sustainable financing mechanism. It is recommended that ongoing technical and financial support from partners be welcomed and encouraged in order to ensure long-term sustainable funding for the property.

In its Decision 45 COM 7B.3, the World Heritage Committee requested that the States Parties invite a new Reactive Monitoring mission to assess the measures undertaken by the States Parties to restore the security of the property, strengthen its management and determine whether OUV is still in any danger. It is appreciated that the States Parties, in their correspondence of 21 November 2023 and 25 January 2024, have invited the World Heritage Centre and IUCN to carry out the new joint monitoring mission. The response of the United Nations Security Officer in Burkina Faso, dated 9 April 2024, to the World Heritage Centre’s correspondence of 2 February 2024 has been noted. It is recommended that the Committee invite the World Heritage Centre and IUCN to carry out the mission as soon as security conditions in the concerned countries permit.

Decisions adopted by the Committee in 2024
Draft Decision: 46 COM 7B.56

The World Heritage Committee,

  1. Having examined document WHC/24/46.COM/7B.Add,
  2. Recalling Decision 45 COM 7B.3, adopted at its extended 45th session (Riyadh, 2023),
  3. Deplores the continuing insecurity in the region of the property marked by the presence of armed groups, welcomes the efforts undertaken by the States Parties to re-establish effective control over the entire surface area of the property and its zone of influence and encourages them to continue their efforts to restore security within the area of the property;
  4. Also welcomes the progress made by the States Parties and their technical and financial partners in collaboration with the local communities in implementing certain corrective measures identified by the 2022 Reactive Monitoring mission, despite the difficult security context in the region, and calls upon the States Parties to maintain this momentum in order to fully implement these recommendations for effective protection and management of the property and to provide accurate data on the coverage of surveillance of the property, as well as the effectiveness thereof;
  5. Thanks the technical and financial partners who are supporting conservation of the property as well as implementation of the recommendations of the 2022 Reactive Monitoring mission and reiterates its appeal to the international community to further support the efforts of the States Parties to ensure sustainable financing for the property;
  6. Takes note of the establishment of a special ecological monitoring programme for certain emblematic species in the Benin component of the property and reiterates its request to the States Parties to carry out regular aerial surveys of all components of the property using the same methodology, so that the results can be compared and wildlife population trends identified, as soon as the security situation permits, and to include this data in the reports submitted to the World Heritage Centre;
  7. Notes with concern that the project to translocate antelopes between the Pendjari Park in Benin and the Chinko Nature Reserve in the Central African Republic was carried out despite the reservations of the Antelope Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission (AfrASG SSC), is concerned that another translocation project was planned between the Pendjari National Park and the W National Park of Benin at the time of the 2022 mission and also asks the States Parties to provide the World Heritage Centre with a status report on these projects and to implement rigorous long-term management measures for any risks that may be associated with introducing the translocation of wildlife species onto the property;
  8. Regrets that the environmental and social impact assessments (ESIA) for the Niger–Benin oil pipeline project and the Banikoara–Kérémou–Burkina Faso border road project were not transmitted to the World Heritage Centre prior to the commencement of operations, in accordance with paragraph 172 of the Guidelines and recalls that any major project within the boundaries of the property, its buffer zone and the wider setting should be subject to an ESIA, including a specific assessment of potential negative impacts on the Outstanding Universal Value (OUV) of the property, following the Guidance and Toolkit for Impact Assessments in a World Heritage context and submitted to the World Heritage Centre for evaluation by IUCN prior to approval;
  9. Noting that the oil pipeline project has already been in the operational phase since November 2023, expresses its concern about the potential impacts of the project on the property’s OUV as indicated by the assessment of the ESIA report and further requests that the States Parties provide further detailed information on the measures planned to preserve the property’s OUV, as well as the measures taken in anticipation of possible accidents, in order to avoid pollution and fire damage;
  10. Noting also that the road project is already in the process of being implemented, expresses its concern about potential significant negative impacts on the property OUV identified in the ESIA report, as well as the lack of information concerning the impacts of the project in its continuity through the W Park of Burkina Faso, furthermore requests that implementation of the project be suspended without delay and that the States Parties provide the World Heritage Centre with detailed information concerning the measures taken to avoid any negative impact on the property’s OUV, in both the Benin and Burkina Faso components, before any decision be taken to continue implementing the project;
  11. Takes note that the request has been submitted for a minor modification to the boundaries of the property in its Niger component for the creation of a buffer zone and also encourages the States Parties to submit the request for a minor modification to the boundaries of the property in its Benin component, in order to strengthen its protection, by 1 February 2025, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session;
  12. Further requests that the Reactive Monitoring mission requested by the Committee in its Decision 45 COM 7B.3, to assess the measures undertaken by the States Parties to restore the security of the property, strengthen its management and determine whether OUV is still in any danger, be undertaken as soon as the security conditions permit in the countries concerned;
  13. Finally requests that the States Parties submit an updated report to the World Heritage Centre on the state of conservation of the property and implementation of the above-mentioned recommendations, by 1 February 2025, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 47th session, considering that the urgent conservation needs of this property require a broad mobilization to preserve its Outstanding Universal Value, including possible inclusion on the List of World Heritage in Danger.
Report year: 2024
Burkina Faso Benin Niger
Date of Inscription: 1996
Category: Natural
Criteria: (ix)(x)
Documents examined by the Committee
SOC Report by the State Party
Report (2024) .pdf
arrow_circle_right 46COM (2024)
Exports

* : The threats indicated are listed in alphabetical order; their order does not constitute a classification according to the importance of their impact on the property.
Furthermore, they are presented irrespective of the type of threat faced by the property, i.e. with specific and proven imminent danger (“ascertained danger”) or with threats which could have deleterious effects on the property’s Outstanding Universal Value (“potential danger”).

** : All mission reports are not always available electronically.


top