Wikidata:Administrators/Confirm 2013/6

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Adminship to be extended permanently. Legoktm (talk) 04:53, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Lukas²³ (talk • contribs • deletions • blocks • protections • imports • rights changes • moves • abuse filter modifications • MediaWiki namespace edits)
• Nomination statement: Hey there, I'm Lukas²³. I haven't been active all the time due to lack of time, but according to this I'm still one of the 10 most active admins of the project. I'd really like to continue helping, especially now in phase 2. I hope I still have the trust of the community. Regards and thanks in advance, Lukas²³ ^talk in German ^Contribs 22:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. Support. DerHexer (talk) 00:00, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
2.  Support \o/ Vogone (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
3.  Support — Arkanosis ^✉ 00:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
4.  Support Legoktm (talk) 00:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
5.  Support --Sk!d (talk) 00:17, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
6.  Support --Rschen7754 00:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
7.  Support Hurricanefan24 (talk) 00:31, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
8.  Support --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 00:31, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
9.  Support ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 00:38, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
10.  Support --Jitrixis (talk) 01:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
11.  Support -- Most active admin here. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 01:57, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
12.  Reconfirm easy decision, this. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
13.  Support Courcelles (talk) 04:56, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
14.  Support --ValterVB (talk) 08:00, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
15.  Support --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
16.  Support --Wholle (talk) 09:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
17.  Support No problem. --Ymblanter (talk) 10:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
18.  Support --Daniel749 talk 10:29, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
19.  Support --Leyo 11:27, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
20.  Support --Iste (D) 11:30, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
21.  Support --Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 11:43, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
22.  Support --PatrickLemke (talk) 12:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
23.  Support – Bináris (talk) 12:52, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
24.  Support. Active admin. Conny (talk) 14:41, 17 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
25.  Support — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 16:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
26.  Support --Wiki13 _talk 18:13, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
27.  Support TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 20:57, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
28.  Support --Stryn (talk) 21:04, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
29.  Support --Avenue (talk) 21:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
30.  Support --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 01:48, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
31.  Support --J36miles (talk) 03:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
32.  Support --Jasper Deng (talk) 05:02, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
33.  Support -- DangSunM (T · C) 12:53, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
34.  Support --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 17:06, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
35.  Support Techman224^Talk 18:12, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
36.  Support -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 22:24, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
37.  Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:03, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
38.  Weak support - knowing than Morten Haan is a real good man but voting against him is not a sign of a good admin. Hope for better judging in the future. Marcus Cyron (talk) 03:25, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
39.  Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 04:54, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
40.  Support. — mantis [religiosa] — 14:29, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
41.  Support. IW 18:11, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
42.  Support Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:08, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Closed as consensus to promote to full adminship. --Rschen7754 04:45, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• NuvieK (talk • contribs • deletions • blocks • protections • imports • rights changes • moves • abuse filter modifications • MediaWiki namespace edits)
• Nomination statement: Honestly, I hadn't contributed to Wikidata for a while because there had been few things to do here. Recently, I had concentrated to my personal life and Korean Wikipedia. After I was looking for something to help ko.wikipedia develop, I just figured out that Wikidata's Phase II just started and was already working on en.wikipedia. Then I came back here, trying to use the tools as much as I could. And by some unknown reasons, there is no administrator who can contribute to Korean related works in Wikidata except for me. I want to be one who actively contribute to Wikidata. I'm so sorry for a long inactive period, but promise you guys that I will try my best for Wikidata. Thanks.--NuvieK 02:56, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1.  Weak support at all because we need a contact person for the Korean community. Vogone (talk) 00:03, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

   I'm uncomfortable with that reasoning. Should we not have the same standards regardless of what languages a user speaks? Sven Manguard Wha? 04:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

   Thank you for your support. But, I'm not only (or the most contactable) user whose first language is Korean in Wikidata. Many Korean users from kowiki and other projects are always ready for providing helps and many of them are more fluent in English than I. :) --NuvieK 20:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2.  Support Low activity, but trusted user who'd like to help with sysop tools, that's enough for me. — Arkanosis ^✉ 00:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
3.  Support because we need Korean admins. Lukas²³ ^talk in German ^Contribs 00:16, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
4.  Support Legoktm (talk) 00:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
5.  Support Hurricanefan24 (talk) 00:31, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
6.  Support a little inactive but a lot of log --Jitrixis (talk) 01:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
7.  Support -- Per Vogone commented above. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 01:59, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
8.  Support --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
9.  Support --Wholle (talk) 09:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
10.  Support --Daniel749 talk 10:29, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
11.  Support --Iste (D) 11:30, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
12.  Support --Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 11:43, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
13.  Support No need of excuses, and we need good people from different languages and time zones. Bináris (talk) 12:55, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
14.  Support. Wants to be active. Conny (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
15.  Support --Wiki13 _talk 18:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
16.  Support --Stryn (talk) 21:04, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
17.  Support --Avenue (talk) 21:22, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
18.  Support 신뢰가 가는 분입니다. (I can trust him!) -- DangSunM (T · C) 12:54, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
19.  weak support per Jitrixis. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 22:40, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
20.  Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 04:54, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
21.  Support. — mantis [religiosa] — 14:30, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
22.  Support. IW 18:11, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
23.  Support Ajraddatz (Talk) 20:08, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Unsuccessful, adminship to be removed after expiry. Legoktm (talk) 04:51, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Morten Haan (talk • contribs • deletions • blocks • protections • imports • rights changes • moves • abuse filter modifications • MediaWiki namespace edits)
• Nomination statement: I know I didn't contribute much lately but since phase II has started I hope I find more time to edit and delete pages and do other things here in Wikidata. I'm still admin on dewiki and I hope the community here still trusts me enough so I can keep the sysop rights. --Morten Haan (talk) 15:58, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1.  Oppose Vogone (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
2.  Support — Arkanosis ^✉ 00:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
3.  Oppose. I trust Morten Haan, but almost no edits between December 1 and February 5 and not that many log actions. Lukas²³ ^talk in German ^Contribs 00:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
4.  Oppose — inactivity. Hurricanefan24 (talk) 00:31, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
5.  Neutral Still trusted, but too inactive. This, that and the other (talk) 01:29, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
6.  Weak support trusted suer but not enough log --Jitrixis (talk) 01:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
7.  Neutral -- Per Lukas²³ commented above and low in admin activity (about 11 actions only). Wagino 20100516 (talk) 02:01, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
8.  Weak oppose per Lukas²³.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:50, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
9.  Neutral Per Wagino. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:29, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
10.  Support --Wholle (talk) 09:04, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
11.  Neutral --Daniel749 talk 10:30, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
12.  Support --Iste (D) 11:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
13.  Support --Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 11:43, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
14.  Support. Yes, I do trust you. We need fellow admins from other projects, and you are active on dewiki. I don't believe that an admin should be here daily and there may come the day when you will be here to stop a vandal in time at night. You don't have to write a book every week to be a writer and don't have to write a new progam every week to be a programmer and don't have to delete something every week just to show you are still an admin. Adminship is a tool to serve the community, not a constraint to feed your pets twice a day. Bináris (talk) 14:00, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
15.  Oppose--CENNOXX (talk) 15:36, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
16.  Support. Will start to be active. Conny (talk) 16:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
17.  Weak oppose. I agree with Lukas23. --Wiki13 _talk 18:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
18.  Oppose Inactive contributor currently. TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 20:54, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
19.  Weak oppose, not many log actions, and deleting Egypt and Property:P60 (without checking that it was in use). --Stryn (talk) 21:04, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
20.  Weak oppose for low activity. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 22:28, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
21.  Oppose Sure, I don't expect every day, but to leave the project for two months reflects not enough activity. --Rschen7754 06:41, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
22.  Support. Good man, there's no cause not to vote for him. Marcus Cyron (talk) 03:22, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
23.  Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 04:54, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
24.  Oppose. — mantis [religiosa] — 14:31, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
25.  Support --Eric-92 (talk) 22:35, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Adminship to be extended permanently. Legoktm (talk) 04:53, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Riley Huntley (talk • contribs • deletions • blocks • protections • imports • rights changes • moves • abuse filter modifications • MediaWiki namespace edits)
• Nomination statement: Ello everyone, I'm Riley. I am mainly active in deletion of [exact] duplicates, empty and merged items. Like other admins, I would like to continue to do this! Thank you for your consideration. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 22:11, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1.  Support Vogone loves Riley. Vogone (talk) 00:01, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
2.  Support — Arkanosis ^✉ 00:06, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
3.  Support Our top dupe destroyer :) Legoktm (talk) 00:11, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
4.  Support Lukas²³ ^talk in German ^Contribs 00:20, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
5.  Support --Rschen7754 00:21, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
6.  Support Hurricanefan24 (talk) 00:31, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
7.  Support --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 00:31, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
8.  Support ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 00:38, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
9.  Support --Jitrixis (talk) 01:42, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
10.  Support -- Experienced and most active admin. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 02:03, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
11.  Support --J36miles (talk) 04:09, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
12.  Reconfirm easy decision, this. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
13.  Yes--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:50, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
14.  Support --ValterVB (talk) 08:02, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
15.  Support --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
16.  Support No problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:04, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
17.  Support --Daniel749 talk 10:30, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
18.  Support --Iste (D) 11:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
19.  Support Would you be willing to add a babel box to your user page? As a Canadian you might have fr-? skills. --Leyo 11:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

    Je crois qu'il vaut mieux si il n'en fait pas. Non, je blague. C'est une bonne idée. — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 16:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

    I will add one a babel box in the morning, thanks! -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 04:57, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

20.  Support --Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 11:43, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
21.  Support – Bináris (talk) 12:58, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
22.  Support – Csigabi (talk) 14:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
23.  Obvious support. The deletionist to end all deletionists. Seriously. That's like one in every 500 items. — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 16:28, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
24.  Support. Active admin. Conny (talk) 16:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]
25.  Support No problem at all with this user. --Wiki13 _talk 18:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
26.  Support Great editor and administrator. TBrandley (talk) 20:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
27.  Support --Stryn (talk) 21:04, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
28.  Support --Avenue (talk) 21:19, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
29.  Support --Eric-92 (talk) 23:34, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
30.  Support --Shanmugamp7 ^(talk) 01:48, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
31.  Support --Frigotoni ...i'm here; 17:07, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
32.  Support Techman224^Talk 18:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
33.  Support -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 22:39, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
34.  Support – One the most active admins here. The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 06:15, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
35.  Support Regards, — Moe Epsilon 04:54, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
36.  Support. — mantis [religiosa] — 14:32, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
37.  Support. IW 18:13, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
38.  Support Armbrust (talk) 00:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.