author-image
ROSE WILD | FEEDBACK

We’re not unduly worried by the ‘due to’ vigilantes

The Times

Nigel Saul writes that he is “driven to complain about the spreading use in your paper — or, rather, the spreading misuse — of the horrid phrase ‘due to’. On Monday you reported that ‘In June no one under the age of 25 died due to the coronavirus.’ This is wrong. The sentence should have read ‘In June no one under the age of 25 died as a result of coronavirus’. ‘Due to’ is constantly being used where the wording ‘because of’ or ‘as a result of’ is needed. An example of correct usage of the phrase ‘due to’ would be ‘The terrible accident was due to a fault in the machinery.’ ”

Mr Saul would have got on with my mother, also a “due