Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/05/23

unlikely own work, some other obvious copyvios from same user have already been deleted Krd 15:27, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:24, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

copy from sina.com 太刻薄 (talk) 03:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

speedied, obvious copyvio.--KTo288 (talk) 02:27, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Teatro_comunale_di_Montecarotto FAM1885 (talk) 20:23, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Apparently a mistake, kept. odder (talk) 03:10, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NAVARFULITO Desdelabanda (talk) 18:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep Fazarburito. Sinnamon Girl (talk) 18:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

wrong email not real Antavious87 (talk) 18:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC) Kept − obvious mistake. Jean-Fred (talk) 18:43, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

אני לא יודע איך להשתמש בממשק של ויקישיתוף באנגלית כי אני דובר עברית ולכן איני יודע גם איך מייחסים מקור ובעלי זכויות יוצרים ואין לי זמן ללמוד זאת. על מנת לפתור את התקלה שנוצרה בעקבות מה שהעליתי אשמח אם תוכלו למחוק את הקובץ מוויקישיתוף. תודה רבה! אני לא יודע איך להשתמש בממשק של ויקישיתוף באנגלית כי אני דובר עברית ולכן איני יודע גם איך מייחסים מקור ובעלי זכויות יוצרים ואין לי זמן ללמוד זאת. על מנת לפתור את התקלה שנוצרה בעקבות מה שהעליתי אשמח אם תוכלו למחוק את הקובץ מוויקישיתוף. תודה רבה! משפחת בונן (talk) 20:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, erronous nomination of help page. --Rosenzweig τ 22:16, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mzzššaaaaaaàa ,..",mm."".."....".m..."..."m.m."".."mm mm'mmm .m "$8""""&&8@ 174.30.50.117 05:25, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 15:28, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

copied straight from the school's website John from Idegon (talk) 16:48, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It would be my honor if you would read the pdf, and since you didn't click on the metadata, I've provided it for you. You may wish to read the description. Please delete this file and the "Dear John" image below. Thanks.

Deleted: This is a speedy -- clear copyvio. I don't know what the pdf is all about -- doesn't offer anything helpful .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious copyvio 舎利弗 (talk) 23:51, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:30, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Text-only image which should be replaced with wiki-table. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry this file should be upload under this name. DEU_Heessen_COA.svg - without blank Juergenk59 (talk) 16:47, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedied. Technical close. Author/nominator changed his mind to speedy.--KTo288 (talk) 02:33, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The major part of this photo consists of that wall painting but there is no FOP in the US 178.7.237.121 02:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete Of course. A freedom of panorama does not extend to this photo. Thank you for pointing that out. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:06, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nom Sven Manguard Wha? 01:10, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

copyrighted poster 太刻薄 (talk) 03:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio Krd 05:47, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

out of scope/unused personal photo ~ Nahid ^Talk 14:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If it's a logo, it's not Own work, and this one seems to be above TOO.    FDMS  4    10:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep - it's still just text. I do not believe aesthetic effects affect the copyright status. See this discussion. --Ixfd64 (talk) 19:04, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  The Pokemon logo consists of a typeface (the two os are identical), a complex one, but this one does not … And this one is not just text with aesthetic effects, but in my eyes rather an (aesthetic) drawing meant to be text.    FDMS  4    19:20, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  Also, this logo does not at all consist of even lines …    FDMS  4    19:24, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn: File:NY_Arrows_logo.png convinced me, the USA seems to have an extremely low TOO.    FDMS  4    19:49, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Something is not right with this image - we do not have any certain evidence about the location of this place. Only flickr users data which seem not to be so trustworthy because we cannot assume good faith of hem. We can only assume good faith from Wikimedia Commons users. 178.7.237.121 02:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No reason to delete. The flickr user lives less than 100 km from Mecklenburg. This IP lives (if IP tracer is right) in southern Germany in Bavaria, around Augsburg. Also there isnt any reasonable reason to suspect this flickr user that as hundreds of images of Mecklenburg. Tm (talk) 02:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Comment Also dont open DR to make a point (per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aircraft at Nuremberg Airport (9629420549).jpg and related discussion about thrustworthy of flickr users). Tm (talk) 02:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Frivolous deletion nomination. Speedy close. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:07, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

out of scope. unused personal photo ~ Nahid ^Talk 14:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Substandard quality photo and thus out of scope 178.7.237.121 02:13, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep In use in En Wiki in Stephen Duncan, so in scope. Tm (talk) 02:47, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep Regarding the "substandard quality", this can be attributed to the use of a low-resolution digital camera, and the pre-Civil War version of Photoshop used in processing. It's the best pic available though, and they're hoping to get Stephen to pose real soon for a new one. In scope, and used on Wikipedia's "Stephen Duncan" article. Magnolia677 (talk) 05:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Invalid deletion rationale. Speedy close as keep. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:11, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Does not appear to be uploader's work; see visual characteristics, watermark in lower right, etc. Эlcobbola _talk 14:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts of questionable notability.

• File:Mapa conceitual projeto.png
• File:Módulo 3 Redefor Ensino de Sociologia Tópicos - Organização das disciplinas no Módulo 3.jpg
• File:Módulo 3 Redefor Ensino de Sociologia - Organização das disciplinas no Módulo 3.jpg
• File:Tema transversal pluralidade cultural.png

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio of [1] 舎利弗 (talk) 23:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedied obvious copyvio.--KTo288 (talk) 02:11, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

• File:Xoviell Foto.jpg
• File:Xoviell El Enviado x Cristo.jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 07:23, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: self-created artwork, self-promotion. Only used on the user page of a user with no useful contribution on en-wikiquote. BrightRaven (talk) 08:39, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Very bad, unnatural quality, non-notable person.    FDMS  4    10:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

muestra información que no quiero revelar Jiberardi (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No encyclopedic or educational merit. User's own design. User has a history of uploading his own artworks and passing it off as historical artifacts. See the archive of his sockpuppet investigation at Wikipedia for reference. 舎利弗 (talk) 02:18, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but the artwork on these book covers is surely still copyrighted, whereby this photo is a derivative. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:49, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obs.: High wiki use. Unclear copyright status. Uploaded in 02.2014 by mass copyvioer Volanick2 (talk · contributions · Statistics) and sourced with an unspecified link to http://www.copa2014.gov.br which says in a negligent way that all content ("Todo o conteúdo") is cc-by-3.0, ignoring eventual other copyrights, considering http://www.copa2014.gov.br/pt-br/sedes/curitiba/arena (main site of that Brazilian stadium) and (example) http://www.copa2014.gov.br/sites/default/files/arenabaixada_campo.jpg (exif available = "Photo by Stringer/Getty Images"). The file (under this title already uploaded by Volanick2 and deleted = reuploaded on same day) appears to be an architectural sketch elaborated by http://www.arenacap.com.br/?page_id=3230. To verify license status a specific link to http://www.copa2014.gov.br is needed. Gunnex (talk) 22:02, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A freedom of panorama does not extend to this photo. My oversight. It's unfortunate to have to delete this though, since people actually look at the photos I upload. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown place ; no notability ; no use ; generic file name Civa (talk) 22:00, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal artwork ; No notability ; No use ; out of COM:SCOPE Civa (talk) 21:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There's no real provenance for this image - it comes from a now-dead page on OMSI.edu; I was able to track down a .pdf on that site which has no date for the photo. Tineye and Reverse GIS produced no useful results. We therefore can't know whether this photo actually is PD, and in accordance with the precautionary principle, I advocate that it be deleted unless sufficient provenance can be supplied. DS (talk) 14:47, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused file, self-created artwork BrightRaven (talk) 08:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is a single-purpose-account that claimed as "own word" his 4 uploaded files, all watermarked as from http://www.rafaelhernandezcolon.org/. Damiens.rf 13:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Self promotion Fixertool (talk) 02:05, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Неиспользуемый файл созданный для демонстрации Higimo (talk) 04:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If Own work, this is probably self-created artwork and not in Commons' scope. Otherwise we might already have a categorised version which is in use.    FDMS  4    10:11, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely bad quality, unlikely Own work (probably a screenshot from a video, …).    FDMS  4    10:12, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 08:43, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:44, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:43, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No indication that uploader is copyright owner -- see http://www.futbolparatodos.com.ar/jugador/daniel-alberto-villalba/. discospinster (talk) 04:02, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No encyclopedic or educational merit. User's own design. User has a history of uploading his own artworks and passing it off as historical artifacts. See the archive of his sockpuppet investigation at Wikipedia for reference. 舎利弗 (talk) 04:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Afbeelding blijkt niet rechtenvrij te zijn - een van de auteurs van de tekst is pas in 2004 overleden OlafJanssen (talk) 08:42, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.google.com/search?q=hugh+laurie+hot&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSaRpnCxCo1NgEGgYIAAg9CEIMCxCwjKcIGjwKOggCEhSaCvAR3B7zEcoeixLuEb0ejxLvERogVjFaZECTCCOAommxw_1DTezNbUrkoE1csrY-M53kpOeAMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgTgbS4ODA&sa=X&ei=R8B-U6nwNcWXkQWM1YEg&ved=0CCQQ2A4oAQ&biw=1366&bih=639 太刻薄 (talk) 03:28, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: private photo of non-notable individual Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not a believable own work claim. Similar photos can be found here. Taylor Trescott (talk) 22:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:40, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is a single-purpose-account that claimed as "own word" his 4 uploaded files, all watermarked as from http://www.rafaelhernandezcolon.org/. Damiens.rf 13:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is a single-purpose-account that claimed as "own word" his 4 uploaded files, all watermarked as from http://www.rafaelhernandezcolon.org/. Damiens.rf 13:34, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SOHO produced image, it is copyrighted to SOHO. Formosania (Chat) 01:23, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded in 04.2014 a lower res version was previously published via http://www.valeverdefm.com.br/site/not%C3%ADcias/item/1348-toledo-e-cianorte-v%C3%A3o-jogar-domingo-%C3%A0s-19h.html (02.2014, Rádio Vale Verde 96,5 fm Ltda. - Todos os Direitos Reservados) = http://www.valeverdefm.com.br/site/media/k2/items/cache/daeaf03c78ddb214e4f37d15ced29379_XL.jpg (last modified: 02.2014) Gunnex (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Subject is uploader, therefore this is not "own work" as claimed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope. Appears to be designed for advertising, rather than any educational purpose Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:51, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is subject, therefore the main image is not "own work" as claimed. Secondary images are probably copyvios. Violates COM:ADVERT .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. This sculpture was made in 1990. Civa (talk) 21:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No encyclopedic or educational merit. User's own design. User has a history of uploading his own artworks and passing it off as historical artifacts. See the archive of his sockpuppet investigation at Wikipedia for reference. 舎利弗 (talk) 04:48, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope. Fry1989 ^eh? 18:31, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. The sculptor Giuseppe Penone is still alive. Civa (talk) 21:48, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copy of http://www.treedim.com/images/treedim_bandeau.png Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:02, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:49, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is a single-purpose-account that claimed as "own word" his 4 uploaded files, all watermarked as from http://www.rafaelhernandezcolon.org/. Damiens.rf 13:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No encyclopedic or educational merit. User's own design. User has a history of uploading his own artworks and passing it off as historical artifacts. See the archive of his sockpuppet investigation at Wikipedia for reference. 舎利弗 (talk) 04:42, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No encyclopedic or educational merit. User's own design. User has a history of uploading his own artworks and passing it off as historical artifacts. See the archive of his sockpuppet investigation at Wikipedia for reference. 舎利弗 (talk) 04:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Potentially non-notable, no accessible source, likely copyrighted.    FDMS  4    10:51, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not your personal free web host Sarah (talk) 23:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Сомнения в авторстве. Файл на сайте Московской консерватории был изменён уже 28 апреля 2011 года, хотя и в меньшем разрешении, также встречается на сайте Центральной музыкальной школы Москвы http://cmsmoscow.ru/about/scholar/2/, на афише http://rusia.lt/uploads/posts/2013-12/1387027170_obzor_10x15_ovcinikov.jpg. Таким образом, авторство непонятно. Dogad75 (talk) 04:18, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of SCOPE (Commons is not Wikipedia).    FDMS  4    10:41, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

While it is certainly possible that this 1950s image is "own wrok", as claimed, it needs more discussion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this image shows a likely recent and thereby still copyrighted work of art. Regrettably, France has no FOP exception for public works. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:39, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this image shows a likely recent and thereby still copyrighted work of art. Regrettably, Belgium has no FOP exception for public works. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:40, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No encyclopedic or educational merit. User's own design. User has a history of uploading his own artworks and passing it off as historical artifacts. See the archive of his sockpuppet investigation at Wikipedia for reference. 舎利弗 (talk) 04:48, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this image shows a likely recent and thereby still copyrighted work of art. Regrettably, Belgium has no FOP exception for public works. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:40, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No encyclopedic or educational merit. User's own design. User has a history of uploading his own artworks and passing it off as historical artifacts. See the archive of his sockpuppet investigation at Wikipedia for reference. 舎利弗 (talk) 05:08, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 11:41, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:50, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Неиспользуемый файл созданный для демонстрации Higimo (talk) 04:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

low quality Kopiersperre (talk) 17:29, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete. Have multiple replacements in Category:Picloram. DMacks (talk) 15:26, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Ed (Edgar181) 12:17, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader is not the creator or owner of the file. See http://www.pbase.com/rwzeitgeist/woodneath to see the source of this and similar images. At the very least the uploader violated the attribution requirement of the CC license. 121.169.105.99 02:53, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this image shows a likely recent and thereby still copyrighted work of art. Regrettably, Belgium has no FOP exception for public works. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:40, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. The sculptor Rabarama is still alive. Civa (talk) 21:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The photographer's and copyright owner's informations from the exif don't match the description page information and the uploader's claims of own work and license. See also the photographer's blog : page, photo -- Asclepias (talk) 00:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No source or authorship information. The uploader somehow managed to upload the file with a completely blank file description page. After i tagged it as missing licensing, source and authorship information, the uploader added a {{PD-self}} tag (which is not a substitute for providing authorship information according to Commons:Licensing#License information). For some reason, they also replaced the {{No license since}} and {{No source since}} tags with the nonexistent templates {{Нет лицензии с}} (whose name means "No license" in Russian) and {{Нет источника с}} ("No source"). Given the low resolution, the lack of metadata, the uploader's history, and the fact that they don't really seem to know what they're doing, I'm skeptical about their claims of being the copyright holder. —LX (talk, contribs) 13:27, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Personal images, out of scope.

• File:Jjtgffdddf.jpg
• File:Ghhh.jpg
• File:Tgdfghhhjh.jpg
• File:Sdfgsd.jpg
• File:Ggdfg.jpg
• File:889kkkk.jpg
• File:Sdasfaf.jpg
• File:Ojkoiofaaa.jpg
• File:My bro.jpg
• File:Gfdbbrr.jpg
• File:Hfy56r.jpg
• File:Kjhkj766.jpg
• File:788784875fs.jpg
• File:Qw.jpg
• File:24;jhjkh.jpg

JurgenNL (talk) 07:51, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete all - not useful for WMF projects, also poorly named. --Ixfd64 (talk) 18:55, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, ~ Nahid ^Talk 05:21, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 08:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

wrong colored atoms, corrected image is available: File:PaCl5.svg Mabschaaf (talk) 18:52, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete. There is no "wrong" in bw coloring there, but the svg version is much better, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 20:28, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delete. As Materialscientist --JWBE (talk) 10:14, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delete. Agree that the coloring is wrong. Ref says "pentagonal bipyramidal PaCl₇ groups", which is how File:PaCl5.svg is (one central black surrounded by 7 white). File:PaF5geometry.PNG instead has the central black surrounded by 5 white and 2 other black. DMacks (talk) 15:45, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. Leyo 17:50, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violations 178.127.151.198 10:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete - no evidence the company has released the artwork under a free license. --Ixfd64 (talk) 18:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:15, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a "professional" (non-free) image, and has no copyright info. TAnthony (talk) 15:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. No licence MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that uploader took this picture. See, e.g., http://www.justjared.com/2014/02/21/william-levy-enrique-iglesias-premio-lo-nuestro-latin-music-awards-2014/. Bbb23 (talk) 21:25, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:24, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded in a row on 05.10.2013, unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF = most likely all files grabbed from internet.

• File:Esplanade singapore.jpg --> stock photo (cropped) = http://www.shutterstock.com/de/pic-153947393/stock-photo-marina-bay-at-night-bird-view-fuzzy-blurry.html by Mario Hagen
• File:Marina bay sands singapore.jpg (redirect) + File:Marina Bay Sands and Bayfront Bridge, Singapore - 20131005.jpg
• File:Singapore skyline.jpg --> stock photo = http://de.123rf.com/photo_22265513_singapore-skyline-der-stadt.html by Leung Cho Pan
• File:Architecture in china.jpg
• File:Skyline in china.jpg --> tagged with copyvio (cropped) via https://www.flickr.com/photos/80455794@N07/8681145829/ (04.2013, all rights reserved by Andreas H*/ah_fotobox)
• File:Recreation in china.jpg
• File:Changi.jpg --> http://www.dingmanphoto.com/asp_scripts/print_image.asp?WebsiteID=15813&GalleryID=152640&MediaID=2823661&Print=0 (Paul Dingman, This media is protected by copyright. ©Paul Dingman 2013) = http://media01.bigblackbag.net/15813/portfolio_media/lwsm_changiaprt_pd_4436_165.jpg (last modified: 2012)
• File:Departure hall of changi airport.jpg
• File:Observation tower changi airport.jpg
• File:Merlion singapore.jpg
• File:Singapore airlines.jpg
• File:Changi airport sky view.jpg
• File:Sunflower garden terminal 2.jpg
• File:Changi airport terminal 2.jpg
• File:Mc donalds in singapore.jpg
• File:Runway of changi airport.jpg
• File:China village life.jpg
• File:Fullerton hotel.jpg
• File:Singapore flyer.jpg --> stock photo = http://de.123rf.com/photo_22054564_skyline-von-singapur-bei-sonnenuntergang.html by Noppasin Wongchum

Gunnex (talk) 09:22, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

low-res, black borders top and bottom. Unlikely to be "own work", can be found elsewhere on the Internet. All other uploads of this user are proven copyvios. Lupo 10:11, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete per Lupo. Picture is unused anyway. --Ixfd64 (talk) 18:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violations 178.127.151.198 10:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete - no evidence it has been released under a free license. --Ixfd64 (talk) 19:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If it is an artist's rendition of a public school in Virginia's crest, then it is a copyright violation. John from Idegon (talk) 16:42, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John. Is there some reason why you would decide to attempt to make this a dirty laundry matter instead of emailing or messaging me about it directly? It's hardly worth blabbing about. It was created for our yearbook in 1978, by ME. Since you've appropriately replaced it, delete it. I only uploaded it because the one there is not interesting and mine was published and approved. I was president of the honor society... please stop trying to impugn my character. You may delete this triffling conversation when you delete any images you desire. Thank you...

Look at bottom of page: https://archive.org/stream/heritage78firs#page/155/mode/1up That WAS me... :-< PresidentistVB (talk) 18:52, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The reason that we have DRs and do not e-mail or message directly is that an e-mail is non-public and a talk page note only nominally public. Whenever there is a question about an image, it deserves public discussion, which it can get here and cannot get elsewhere. Note that we start around 200 DRs and delete more than 1,500 images every day. While it would be nice if we had the human resources to give personal attention to each, we have barely enough active admins to keep up with the deluge. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

deleted: Probably not okey Natuur12 (talk) 11:23, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image is a violation of privacy (my privacy) Savoldi (talk) 13:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chiedo scusa di nuovo e approvo tutte le cancellazioni. --Andrp5x9b (talk) 16:40, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: While this file could very well remain on Commons the uploader agrees with this file being deleted. It doesn't seem ethical to keep the files while the owner of the house and the uploader want the file to be deleted. This case could escalate so this seems the best solution for all party's. Natuur12 (talk) 11:22, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope: unused files, self-created artworks

• File:La représentation.JPG
• File:Inspirer expirer.JPG
• File:D'après un portrait de Léon Schwartzenberg.JPG
• File:La découverte du langage.JPG
• File:Aqueduc Marseille.JPG
• File:Cuisine du chef.JPG
• File:Vue de Marseille.JPG
• File:Promenade au port.JPG
• File:Fête du port.JPG
• File:Vue du port de Marseille.JPG
• File:Nature morte.JPG
• File:Le chef.JPG
• File:Orgue de barbarie.JPG
• File:Animaux à Londres.jpg
• File:Passage en bleu.jpg
• File:Mystères.jpg
• File:La source de l'arc-en-ciel.jpg
• File:Jets d'eau.jpg
• File:Fontaines du Trocadéro.jpg
• File:Gosse de café à Montmartre.jpg
• File:Enfants se baignant dans les fontaines du Trocadéro.jpg
• File:Noeud à l'avant.JPG
• File:Marin à l'avant de la proue.JPG
• File:Ville portuaire de la Méditerranée.JPG
• File:Baléares.JPG
• File:Ville portuaire.JPG
• File:Marins du port de Tanger.JPG
• File:Passage devant l'Afrique.JPG
• File:Lancée de corde de l'avant de la proue.JPG
• File:Blanc et noir.JPG
• File:Service espagnole.JPG
• File:Cap à l'encre.JPG
• File:Séminaire Réunion commerciale.JPG
• File:Chevaux sauvages en Bretagne.JPG
• File:Parcours de santé.JPG
• File:Expérience électrostatique.JPG
• File:Procès de deux terroristes corses au TGI de Paris.JPG
• File:Séniors au collège de France.JPG
• File:Mariage sur le toît d'un bus....JPG
• File:Passage parisien rencontre.JPG
• File:Etalage de fruits.JPG
• File:Fermier breton portant son fils hors de table.JPG
• File:Salle Colbert, Assemblée nationale à Paris.JPG
• File:Dessus la barre.JPG
• File:Figure en l'air.JPG
• File:Démonstration de rollers blade.JPG
• File:Godille.JPG
• File:En route vers le futur.JPG
• File:La coiffure.JPG
• File:La main.JPG
• File:Barcelone, veille dame aux courses.JPG
• File:Barcelone, place du marché.JPG
• File:La godille dans le port.JPG
• File:Un père portant son fils emporté.JPG
• File:Fermier breton et son fils à table.JPG
• File:Timonier faisant les noeuds.JPG
• File:La recouvrance.JPG
• File:Une naissance.JPG
• File:Nativité à la grotte de Morgat.JPG
• File:Baisé inspiré.JPG
• File:Ecoute de la musique devant la maison de Mozart.JPG
• File:Baisé aspiré.JPG
• File:La maison de Mozart.JPG
• File:La maison de Balzac.JPG
• File:Photo15 Coït interrompu.jpg
• File:Photo14 L'estime.jpg
• File:Photo13 La jalousie.jpg
• File:Photo12 "Oedipe Roi".jpg
• File:Photo11 Le mépris.jpg
• File:Photo10 Défi.jpg
• File:Photo7 Le désir et l'amour.jpg
• File:Photo8 Le désir et l'amour.jpg
• File:Photo9 La colère.jpg
• File:Photo06 Passage parision.jpg
• File:Photo3 La tristesse.jpg
• File:Photo5 Désir et l'amour.jpg
• File:Photo4 Collages divers.jpg
• File:Photo2 La mortuaire.jpg
• File:Photo1 Le double.jpg
• File:Steerman.JPG

BrightRaven (talk) 07:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:09, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr cannot assume a Creative Commons license for this image - it is simply not possible. 178.7.237.121 02:25, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep This is a flickr account of the the Boston Public Library that states that this postcard has "Rights: No known restrictions". Also this postcard doesnt seem to have a copyright statement per copyright standards of works made before 1977 (per {{PD-US-no notice}}). Tm (talk) 02:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep - Correct question, wrong method of dealing with it. All that is needed is to ask the uploader whether it has the right license. If there was no satisfactory answer, then a DR might be justified. Green Giant (talk) 12:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 11:01, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This file is a violation of privacy Savoldi (talk) 13:58, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree! Please eliminate the picture. --Esploratoreludwig 17:09, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Deleted: While this file could very well remain on Commons the uploader agrees with this file being deleted. It doesn't seem ethical to keep the files while the owner of the house and the uploader want the file to be deleted. This case could escalate so this seems the best solution for all party's. Natuur12 (talk) 11:22, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. The sculptor Rabarama is still alive. Civa (talk) 21:41, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I deeply regret that there is no law for free panorama right in France , and I hope it will change soon ; I d'ont have time to seek permission of the author. If you can keep this photo in the database to publish it when it wil be allowed, do not hesitate. thank you for your work.--F. Lamiot (talk) 07:56, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:15, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This file is a violation of privacy Savoldi (talk) 13:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accetto la cancellazione. Con le dovute scuse, --Esploratoreludwig 16:56, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Deleted: While this file could very well remain on Commons the uploader agrees with this file being deleted. It doesn't seem ethical to keep the files while the owner of the house and the uploader want the file to be deleted. This case could escalate so this seems the best solution for all party's. Natuur12 (talk) 11:22, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image is a violation of privacy (my privacy). Savoldi (talk) 13:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao Savoldi, sono d'accordo con la cancellazione dell'immagine. Ti do del "tu" perché così si usa in Wikipedia. Non sapevo di violare la privacy. Scusami tanto, spero verranno tolte tutte le foto al più presto. Buona serata, --Esploratoreludwig 16:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

This image is a violation of privacy (my privacy). Savoldi (talk) 14:31, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Please eliminate the picture. Sorry, --Esploratoreludwig 17:04, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

I received the request from a user. The picture is a violation of his privacy! I am sorry: please eliminate the picture, Esploratoreludwig 17:06, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Could you, please, explain what kind of privacy is violated here? I see neither identifiable people, nor anybody's private data. Which deletion reason from here you would like to apply? Ankry (talk) 23:01, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader agreed with the file being deleted Natuur12 (talk) 11:19, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Poor quality diagram, in .jpg; unused; a better version exists in .svg. Rhadamante (talk) 14:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notification. Since there is another version of the same image then this image should be deleted.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Papik1988 (talk • contribs)

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:15, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image is a violation of privacy (my privacy) Savoldi (talk) 13:55, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you, please, explain what kind of privacy is violated here? I see a building view from a public street. Or am I wrong? Ankry (talk) 23:01, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Esprimo le mie scuse e approvo assolutamente la cancellazione!--Andrp5x9b (talk) 16:39, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: While this file could very well remain on Commons the uploader agrees with this file being deleted. It doesn't seem ethical to keep the files while the owner of the house and the uploader want the file to be deleted. This case could escalate so this seems the best solution for all party's. Natuur12 (talk) 11:21, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is impossible to have this image under the from flickr given Creative Commons license. In the time when this image was taken there was no Creative Commons 178.7.237.121 02:20, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep This nomination doesn't make sense. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:42, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep - perfectly right to raise the question, but perfectly wrong method. A courteous question on the user's talkpage should have preceded any thought of a DR. The image looks like an old postcard, although I might be wrong. Could it be a PD image? Green Giant (talk) 12:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The photo was likely from this series from 1923. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:45, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment So, the flickr user "R Orville Lyttle" is not the copyright holder of this image? Where did "R Orville Lyttle" take the right to publish this file under a free CC license - if this is the case? Does any PD license apply? --High Contrast (talk) 19:38, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Although no date is attached to the photo, it was likely created along with the postcards in this series. No matter where the photo came from--Flickr, the net, wherever--its age (pre-1940) makes it public domain in Canada. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:58, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately you did not bring valid evidence for the PD status - only speculation. "along with the postcards in this series" is a bit weak. --High Contrast (talk) 12:09, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because of this nomination for deletion, I went looking for a better picture of the mill, and found many. As a result, this picture is no longer linked to any article. How ironic that the vandal IP user who originally put forward this nomination, actually improved the quality of the photos about this subject. If anyone on here might know who that vandal user is, please thank them! Magnolia677 (talk) 14:12, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion. File could not be okey for other reasons but the reason given by the nom is not correct Natuur12 (talk) 11:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This file is a violation of privacy Savoldi (talk) 15:30, 23 May 2014 (UTC) Di nuovo scusa. Sorry again! The image must be eliminate! --Andrp5x9b (talk) 16:44, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader agreed with the file being deleted Natuur12 (talk) 11:19, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image is a violation of privacy. Savoldi (talk) 13:57, 23 May 2014 (UTC) Chiedo scusa. Sorry! Of course all these picture must be eliminate. --Andrp5x9b (talk) 16:44, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: While this file could very well remain on Commons the uploader agrees with this file being deleted. It doesn't seem ethical to keep the files while the owner of the house and the uploader want the file to be deleted. This case could escalate so this seems the best solution for all party's. Natuur12 (talk) 11:22, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No encyclopedic or educational merit. User's own design. User has a history of uploading his own artworks and passing it off as historical artifacts. See the archive of his sockpuppet investigation at Wikipedia for reference. 舎利弗 (talk) 04:49, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Support This file should be deleted, especially the original uploader made a wrong map without any reference. — ᴀʟʀᴇᴀᴅʏ ʙᴏʀᴇᴅ ^ʜᴜʜ? 16:38, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In use so all arguments other than copyrightconcerns must be ignored Natuur12 (talk) 11:02, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Map with no historical or educational value. User has a problematic history of uploading copyvios and passing off his artwork as historical content. See his English Wikipedia profile and his sockpuppet investigation page (at the same wiki) for reference. Deletion was previously declined by an administrator because file was in use. That is no longer the case now. 舎利弗 (talk) 11:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 09:31, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violations 178.127.151.198 10:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete - no evidence it has been released under a free license. --Ixfd64 (talk) 19:00, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As indicated, derivated ("Derivado de "Baixada Arena.jpg") from File:Baixada Arena.jpg, deleted via Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Soulflytribe. Gunnex (talk) 22:09, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:15, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. The sculptor Rabarama is still alive. Civa (talk) 21:40, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I deeply regret that there is no law for free panorama right in France , and I hope it will change soon ; I d'ont have time to seek permission of the author. If you can keep this photo in the database to publish it when it wil be allowed, do not hesitate. thank you for your work.--F. Lamiot (talk) 07:57, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:15, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: ? Natuur12 (talk) 11:16, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence this is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the governement of the USA?    FDMS  4    08:42, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Keep - This was uploaded by a new editor who needs some pointers on how to fill out the description, etc. It's being used on an article and a DYK nomination. I'll leave some notes, hopefully this information can be provided and this image can be kept. Maile66 (talk) 14:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Still no evidence Natuur12 (talk) 11:13, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

4 artworks by Wilhelm Aurnhammer, who seems to be non notable + 1 picutre of him. The uploader seems to be the daughter of the artist.

• File:Small Aurnhammer.jpg
• File:Wilhelm Aurnhammer Portrait.jpg
• File:Aurnhammer Geometric forms.JPG
• File:Aurnhammer impossFig.JPG
• File:Aurnhammer Geometric Figures.JPG

BrightRaven (talk) 10:22, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:14, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering also User talk:Ntrain197, "All-he-can-get"-uploader regarding en:Louisville Cardinals football. Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided (especially the files sourced with http://digital.library.louisville.edu, failing PD, CC0 or whatever, see also conditions).

• File:1926 Louisville Season.jpg
• File:Tom and corso.jpg
• File:Fred koster.jpg
• File:Alternate helmets.jpg
• File:Rebirth of Athletics At Louisville.jpg
• File:PJCS.jpg
• File:Struting Cardinal.jpg
• File:Johnny U and Otto Knop.jpg
• File:Otto Knop.jpg
• File:Tom King.jpg
• File:2013uni.jpg
• File:Uni2013.jpg
• File:A-lyles lenny02.jpg --> copyvio via (example) http://louisville.straitpinkie.com/lenny-lyles-passes-away/ (2011, © Copyright louisville.straitpinkie.com 2014. Owned and operated by Slush Fund Media, LLC. All rights reserved.) = http://louisville.straitpinkie.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/lyles.bmp
• File:Frank-camp.jpg
• File:Unitas front color.jpg
• File:Louisville Football 1949.jpg
• File:Louisville Football 1921.jpg
• File:Louisville Football 1904.jpg
• File:Louisville Football1907.jpeg

Gunnex (talk) 08:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:11, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

4 files restored, as per [2]. Yann (talk) 21:15, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

• File:Athens Tavern.jpg
• File:Bobby Petrino 1st Tenure.jpg
• File:John L Smith.jpg
• File:Ron Cooper.jpg
• File:Bobby Petrino.jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete If you have a history of uploading copyvios of small web images and claiming them as own works, we shouldn't trust any small images that you upload and claim as your own. Nyttend (talk) 23:54, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 20:17, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page about a non notable artist. Self-promotion. BrightRaven (talk) 08:00, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 11:10, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]