Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Legends League Cricket

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Barkeep49 (talk) 00:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Legends League Cricket

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of WP:SUSTAINED coverage to pass WP:GNG. This event and all of it's (so far 2) seasons falls foul of WP:NOTINHERITED- just because some notable people played in the event, this doesn't make the event itself notable, as it's a clear GNG failure. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cricket and Oman. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. Fails WP:GNG, WP:OFFCRIC, and WP:EVENT. Its whole existence is based around WP:INHERITED and has no WP:LASTING. AA (talk) 16:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
matches of this league are covered by sources like ESPNcricinfo, etc. Vikas265 (talk) 17:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So what? Cricinfo has scorecard coverage of lots of matches, that doesn't make them notable. Joseph2302 (talk) 06:10, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Vikas265:. Cricinfo has scorecards of early 2000s club matches, doesn't make the leagues notable. Most of what you introduce just isn't notable. AA (talk) 13:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:58, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per the nom, this league does not meet the WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Routine match reports, statistics and coverage of individual players don't cut it for notability, and that is pretty much all I'm seeing here. Let'srun (talk) 20:04, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the main article and redirect the seasons such as 2022 Legends League Cricket Masters to Legends League Cricket. Legends League Cricket as a topic meets WP:SIGCOV - there is direct, in-depth coverage with proper bylines in Al-Jazeera ([1]), Sportstar ([2]), and Arabian Business ([3]). I'm also in favor of redirecting 2022 Legends League Cricket and 2023 Legends League Cricket to the main article (although not yet nominated). 2001:861:3B89:90D0:2DB1:3B21:F04B:1070 (talk) 20:33, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Funny how a random IP knows about WP:SIGCOV. I already have my suspicions that two socks are involved in these articles... AA (talk) 21:25, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did not see the articles 2022 Legends League Cricket and 2023 Legends League Cricket posted these above. It seems too late to add them to this AFD now, but if there is consensus to delete these other articles, I will raise an AFD for those 2 as well afterwards. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:34, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.