Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open value network (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:46, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open value network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, term doesn't seem widely used. The article is entirely unreferenced and I can't find any indication it's increased in notability since the previous deletion in 2017. The deletion reasons from then still seem to apply. JaggedHamster (talk) 11:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Software. JaggedHamster (talk) 11:27, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nom. Also a bit promotional in tone but not enough for G11 '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 12:51, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• delete Besides all the above it reads as though it had been created by a buzz phrase generator. Mangoe (talk) 16:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: This article seems to be in the same boat as the previous deletion attempt in 2017. There are no sources listed, and I can't find any evidence the topic has become more well-known since then. Waqar💬 19:10, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom fails WP:GNG. Few sources [1], [2] (primary, non-indi), ISO/IEC 15944-15 (primary, per article). Widefox; talk 11:53, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I agree with the comment from the previous AfD that it seems a marketing tagline for Sensorica that didn't really take off. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 01:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.