Talk:Phoenician settlement of North Africa

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Phoenicia Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Africa Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. History This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 January 2024 and 15 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Phoeniciansea2024 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Jking1304, ColinMc0529, Willbatchelder.

— Assignment last updated by MotoMoto1952 (talk) 13:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsure why this article was flagged for copyvio in the first place, as the copyvio tool shows only a 4.8% similarity with the original sources, and the copied passages are both brief and properly cited. I have already revised and rephrased the existing text. I don't think this article constitutes a copyright violation at all. Given that the IP responsible for adding the tag is a disruptive blocked sockpuppet, I will proceed to remove the tag. Skitash (talk) 19:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Skitash: The copyvio tool does not check against Google Books, which is where the majority of this article's sources are. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 15:04, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]