Jump to content

User talk:Oswaldpereira

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Beyond the newsroom, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 13:58, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Beyond the newsroom has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://beyondthenewsroom.wordpress.com.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:23, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just to make a couple of things very clear here:

  1. Per our conflict of interest policy, you are not permitted to use Wikipedia to write and publish an advertisement for your own book.
  2. Wikipedia has certain rules about the writing style and format of our content; articles on here are to follow our rules, not your own personal preferences. If an article is tagged for certain necessary improvements (such as the fact that articles must be categorized), you are not permitted to remove the tags — which you've now done two or three times — without performing the noted improvements.

You are subject to the same rules on here as everybody else. Please keep this in mind in the future. Bearcat (talk) 10:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Beyond the newsroom for deletion

[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Beyond the newsroom, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond the newsroom until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WuhWuzDat 14:52, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Beyond the newsroom has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. e.g. from http://www.omantribune.com/index.php?page=news&id=69264&heading=India  Chzz  ►  15:02, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]