Steward requests/Checkuser
Checkuser icons | |
---|---|
These indicators are used by CheckUsers and stewards for easier skimming of their notes, actions and comments. | |
{{Confirmed}}: ![]() |
{{MoreInfo}}: ![]() |
{{Likely}}: ![]() |
{{Deferred}}: ![]() |
{{Possible}}: ![]() |
{{Completed}}: ![]() |
{{Unlikely}}: ![]() |
{{TakeNote}}: ![]() |
{{Unrelated}}: ![]() |
{{Doing}}: ![]() |
{{Inconclusive}}: ![]() |
{{StaleIP}}: ![]() |
{{Declined}}: ![]() |
{{Fishing}}: ![]() |
{{Pixiedust}}: ![]() |
{{8ball}}: ![]() |
{{Duck}}: ![]() |
{{Crystalball}}: ![]() |
This page is for requesting CheckUser information on a wiki with no local CheckUsers (see also requesting checkuser access). Make sure to follow the following instructions, or your request may not be processed in a timely manner.
Before making a request:
- Make sure you have a good reason for the check. It will only be accepted to counter vandalism or disruption to Wikimedia wikis. Valid reasons include needing a block of the underlying IP or IP range, disruptive sockpuppetry, vote-stacking, and similar disruption where the technical evidence from running a check would prevent or reduce further disruption.
- Be specific in your reasons. Ambiguous or insufficient reasons will cause delays. Explain the disruption and why you believe the accounts are related, ideally using diff links or other evidence.
- Make sure there are no local checkusers.
- Please ensure that the check hasn't already been done:
How to make a request
|
---|
How to make a request:
|
Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests
Μαυρο Μαργαριταρι@el.wikipedia
- List of users
- Μαυρο Μαργαριταρι (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Μαδαρός (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Vrahomarinaner (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Επισκεπτήριος (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Tina ftore (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ΜάκηςΚεφαλονίτης (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Ερωφίλη (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Ορενόκος (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Mangaolo (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Crveno belli (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion: el:Βικιπαίδεια:Μαριονέτα
Reason(s): Μαυρο Μαργαριταρι exhibits the same editing pattern of blind reverts and silly vandalism as Μαδαρός in the elwiki article on the battle of Crete (el:Μάχη της Κρήτης -- please check the article's history page).
The former is an account that was activated and started editing the article only a short while after the latter was blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet. There may well be a number of sleepers, as the sockmaster (Vrahomarinaner, whose account has also been indefinitely blocked) tends to edit WP using a large number of accounts (as previously confirmed after CU requests here) or as an IP. Ασμοδαίος (talk) 18:44, 18 March 2018 (UTC)CheckUser requests are not votes or discussions. – Ajraddatz (talk) 16:37, 20 April 2018 (UTC) |
---|
|
Pertonax@global
- List of users
- Imiter1 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Doroti2017 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Esperanto9999 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Rmcharb (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Stclair1 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Worlock1 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Please note that except Esperanto9999 all others would be Stale as CU data is only kept for a short period of time. No check user query ran here. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 20:19, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
- @MarcoAurelio: I keep finding more IPs, users and domains, but I see that CheckUser is not going to help on those either. I may however need a hand to have any (underlying) ranges globally blocked, they seem to be using open proxies and VPNs. --Dirk Beetstra T C (en: U, T) 15:20, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- @MarcoAurelio: any new thing on this request? --Alaa :)..! 12:39, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
- I don't handle SRCU requests nowadays. None of the accounts provided above have any IP data we can query as it's expired, as I said above though. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:54, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Mymliou@zh.wikipedia
- List of users
- Mymliou (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Babišfirst (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Navigationm (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- AOdawgjavn (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Entnavigati (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Jkforumnoone (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ProgresTranspacificnershi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Enduranceoc (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ErviceLocationu (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 反濫權者 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Jessechi@zh.wikipedia
- List of users
- Jessechi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Qwu105730 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Aq3151 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#Jessechi
- Jessechi is, as you probably know, Stale before we start.
- From the category, User:1by1, User:13adqezc, User:13579ol, User:3wsdr4, User:9to9, User:Aq3151, User:Aisidi, User:A8756, User:Atqatq, User:Coffeecorner, User:Eaaarataha, User:Goog00, User:Ilikehk, User:Kokookooo, User:Kiwiwoko, User:Mainaccount has been last active during March. (That category is big enough, so first page and last edit (via NavPopup) analyzed. — regards, Revi 16:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Again, thank you revi for the analysis. However, please be aware that we haven't check Jessechi and his puppets from last November and most (if not all) of the accounts banned came from the It looks like a duck to me decision from local sysops. I'm not saying that their interpretation was wrong, but there exist possibilities that some of these accounts might not be Jessechi. --Innocentius Aiolos 16:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- This isn't check result, I was just glancing over the category and trying to find a list of sock to compare with. I'm not doing the check for now. — regards, Revi 16:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- I added a username, Aq3151, since Aq3151 and Qwu105730 had made similar disruptive edits in w:zh:2018年中華民國直轄市長及縣市長選舉. --云间守望 - (Talk with WQL) 12:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- Again, thank you revi for the analysis. However, please be aware that we haven't check Jessechi and his puppets from last November and most (if not all) of the accounts banned came from the It looks like a duck to me decision from local sysops. I'm not saying that their interpretation was wrong, but there exist possibilities that some of these accounts might not be Jessechi. --Innocentius Aiolos 16:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Doing... — regards, Revi 09:31, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
— regards, Revi 10:10, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Hatake@sq.wikipedia
- List of users
- Hatake (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Zall-herr (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Barnabë Trohasi (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 185.22.172.17 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): User:Hatake (master) is a prolific sock creator in the Albanian Wikipedia (SQwiki), who is inofficially backed and encouraged by one administrator there. He refuses to block his new sockpuppets even when there is evident proof that they're sockpuppets. Ever since he was blocked in January he has been creating one sockpuppet after another. These include: User:Llazgo, User:Fapaf, User:Qiqrra etc. As soon as his latest socks User:GjonBdeku and user:Dedalia were discovered and blocked, after a checkuser request here, we suspect that he created a new sockpuppet called user:Zall-herr. This new user seems experienced and in just a few days he has edited a lot of articles Hatake and his socks edited as well. User:Zall-herr is the new sockpuppet created by User:Hatake in SQwiki. He insults and attacks people all the time (example: Misto Treska ). I have behavioral evidence as well, this means that the case is confirmed. As one of the people attacked by him, I confirm Zall-herr is just another sockpuppet of Hatake, created just 1 day after his latest socks user:Dedalia and user:GjonBdeku were discovered and blocked. If the administrator 1l2l3k wanted Hatake's sock Zall-herr to be blocked, he would've been blocked by now. It's two weeks since Zall-herr was confirmed as a sock, yet 1l2l3k didn't lift a finger to block him. 1l2l3k is the same admin who blocked a random anonymous IP with 1 edit for being a "sock of Udha", despite his behavior showing no correlation to user:Udha.1 Also he blocked user:Arkivisti with no reason (Arkivisti was just asking to protect article [1] from vandalism!!!) encouraging Zall-herr and giving him privileges to control most articles in SQwiki. Yet somehow he cannot recognize a sock by Hatake even when he's presented with evidence, even after we successfully discovered 13 Hatake socks on our own since December while informing him (1) first about each new sock?! 1l2l3k even has a personal list of most Hatake socks! Please help us, as we don't know how to stop him.
--Cinephile-al (talk) 11:11, 7 May 2018 (CEST)
CheckUser requests are not votes or discussions. — regards, Revi 09:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC) |
---|
The IP user:1l2l3k added to the checkuser request, started throwing a fit, vandalizing articles related to communism but also artists and historians whom user:Hatake views as being communist. For the record, Hatake is an ardent anti-communist. The IP started throwing insults. Then when he vandalized some of my articles like this one instead of giving a reason he insulted me "pis i paburre" (Hatake often calls me "unmanly"). Then he vandalized another article including words like "unmanly" and "wicked" in the reasoning (In Albanian wicked is "i paUDHË", a word play for my username Udha)2. When an anonymous IP reverted his vandalism, the troll IP reverted all the edits back giving something like "I reverted Udha" as a reason and throwing some additional insults at me. He then went on to vandalize my User Page and accuse another user of being my sock. Afterwards he created the account User:Barnabë Trohasi. Besides pretty much openly admitting that he's Hatake in his very first edit, insulting the "communists" on SQwiki, he reverted some of his vandalism back, but continued insulting me with his new account "pis i flliqt"--Udha (talk) 18:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
There is no vandalism by anyone else except Hatake/Zall-herr/Barnabë etc, and except for the dozens of calls directed to admin 1|2|3k to protect the neutral version of "Misto Treska" article from Hatake and his 15 sockpuppets malicious and dirty attacks pushing the same POV. We’re not surprised that admin 1|2|3k and Master Hatake share the same negative POV at this article.[2] You've been backing him up regularly, you granted him the privilege of the controller, and you've always approved vandalism that Hatake did to the referenced materials, leaving malicious variants that stain the figure of a dead person 25 years ago (!!!), despite calls by his family members [3] that made you know that they have denounced this unstable human being to the police [4] . Accept here openly that you are a supporter of this vandal and block me, User Arkivisti, User Udha, X, Y and anyone else who doesn't think alike Hatake. You never blocked him, another administrator did, and just for one week waiting for checkuser result here. Go on and block us all, as your Master Hatake orders you. Have a look at "Misto Treska" revision history [5] , there are plenty of IPs who vandalized the article and are still free to vandalize everywhere else as you didn't block them![6] [7] --SnSlol (talk) 22:05, 9 May 2018 (CEST)
|
Please take local discussions to local. — regards, Revi 09:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Ελλ@el.wikipedia
- List of users
- Ελλ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- ΕρΚιλλ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Τακλαμακαν (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion: el:Ειδικό:Συνεισφορές/Ελλ
Glucken has insult other users. For example he/she has say "go to a psychiatric hospital psycho. There will come cops and you will run to hide. Go away moron with your stubid ideas." diff. Propagandise and mocks against Christians, and whosoever who does not agree agree with him/her he/she calls him mockingly "far-right" while he offenced because i called a wikipedian "left"! Also, he changes my words and wants from admins to block me. Do you want diffs? To concluse, you, the stewards are free to search whatever and anything from me. Ah and User:Glucken123 make and a request for User:Μαντίνγκο and you. As you say you aren't him then why to fear?--Ελλ (talk) 15:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Ελλ, who is currently banned from the Greek Wikipedia, had multiple chances and opportunities to comply to the rules and despite the many warnings from administrators, he kept vandalising and also abusing other users by verbally assaulting or in some cases threatening them. Another well-used tactic that can be seen in his above-mentioned response, is the rhetoric of reverse accusation. A person (in this case me) who has expressed a very specific concern about him being a sock puppet, is unfairly targeted with random accusations (e.g me being a sock puppet). I consider this to be an attempt to turn the spotlight on unimportant issues. This is another example of breaching the rules, as from what I understand this section is not a vote or debate, but only a platform to report misbehaviour within the whole community. Furthermore, his constant attempts to accuse other users of anti-democratic or anti-christian tactics is simply flawed. What he really does is remove validated content from pages that he considers to be either anti-christian or against his own beliefs (that is another breach of POV). If you have any doubts about this, a look at his bans will immediately convince you. To address the ridiculous accusations about me being a sock puppet, he previously expressed a number of concerns regarding my intentions. Of course, I have directed him to this page in case he wanted to investigate this - he didn't and laughed off my suggestions. Hence, his response above is not only a clear breach of rules, but also an unnecessary distraction from the true issue regarding his activity. If an administrator could perform the checkuser, it would be greatly appreciated. In case you need me to provide any other information, please don't hesitate to contact me. Glucken123 (talk) 18:35, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Dear Ruslik and Revi, do I need to provide more information for the check? Hope I am not missing something, thanks. Glucken123 (talk) 12:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Glucken123 who continually attacks Christians? Oh yeah "Christiantaliban" here the diff. "You didn't borried be banned all time? diff. Oh yeah ok. Do you, stewards, want other diffs for his attacks, Christian-phobe and patriophobe delusions? Ah who is currently banned from the Greek Wikipedia for three days? Here his block log, compare my own and my his own log.--Ελλ (talk) 17:12, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
And the irony is that he wants my bans, like here, (reasons; judicial threats, personal attacks, slanders and other related fairy tales) and when the administrators ban him, after his attacks, he says "I consider abusive and unfair three days blocking unnecessarily." and complains like here. Any other examples? I have so many of them. Really why did you odd my first comment? [8] --Ελλ (talk) 17:27, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
I am pretty sure that everyone can fully realise the extent to which this person's telling the truth. Ελλ's obvious trolling behaviour and unintelligible use of English prove most of my points and hence, I don't have much to add. Furthermore, even here they clearly attempt to sabotage my request by turning it into a conversation-debate, though it isn't. His far-right clique within the Greek Wikipedia is doing the same, while the use of the Greek word "Christian-Taliban" is a famous pop culture reference that "somehow" offended the same group that vandalises on a daily basis. To summarise my points, I asked politely from the stewards to perform a quick check in order to determine whether this person is a sockpuppet or not. For the last time, dear Ruslik and Revi, can someone have a look at this or am I asking for something too unreasonable? I thought that this is the actual section to request checks. Thanks. Glucken123 (talk) 19:54, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Cinephile-al@sq.wikipedia
- List of users
- Cinephile-al (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Arkivisti (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- SnSlol (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 79.171.53.95 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 79.171.53.101 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 134.0.58.52 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 79.171.53.230 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion: Albanian wiki WP:SOCK policy
- Good to see that after my last comment here you reflected about some of your mistakes and double standards and decided to finally report user:Cinephile-al properly. The report comes a little late as you already blocked some users above under the pretext of being "socks" of Cinephile-al (1, and that with NO confirmation, and on top of that you also asked the community on Albanian Wikipedia to vote on permanently blocking @Cinephile-al:. One of the reasons you gave there is that after being banned he socked with new accounts and IPs, vandalizing and insulting. Again you had no confirmation for your claims, yet you asked the community to block him permanently. This happened after he criticized you here for your abuses. On the other hand you still refuse to block a confirmed sockpuppet of Hatake, which is one of the accusations user:Cinephile-al made against you.--Udha (talk) 14:34, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, I'm not going to comment here further as this seems to be improper. I'm sorry.--Udha (talk) 15:02, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
- Not doing the check but No comment with respect to IP address(es). — regards, Revi 16:13, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Tsiusing106@zh.wikipedia
- List of users
- Tsiusing106 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- IU22 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- IUn22 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Rise2794 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:HAM#Rise2794
(Note: They were confirmed socks. This request actually hopes to find other sleepers)--1233 | Questions?| This message is left by him at 11:15, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
- Doing... — regards, Revi 11:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
- Confirmed: Tsiusing106, IU22, IUn22, Rise2794, ChouTzuyu25, Dahyun98, ChouTzuyu32, Namjoo96, A313314, Dahyun34, IU23, Rise2014, Seolhyun43, Taeyeon2006, Taeyeon2906, Taeyeon206, Bona408, Wjsnyeoreum101, Exy11, Exy311, Rise2805
- Possible to confirmed above: Jimmylam [low data to check, naming conventions (It looks like he's naming his username after K-pop stuff) and editing patterns (with my limited Hanja reading) seems bit different.]
— regards, Revi 13:00, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
川普@zh.wikipedia
- List of users
- 川普 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 特朗普 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 江泽民的奶子 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#川普
- Confirmed. The full list of socks: Fhwhwof, Fhwhwofjifwof, Fhwofw, Fjirjfiw, 特朗普, 川普, 智慧树, Trump's Dicks, 江泽民奶子不小啊!, 江泽民的咪咪, Trump's Dick and 江泽民的奶子. Ruslik (talk) 20:21, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Howbunbun@zh.wikipedia
- List of users
- Howbunbun (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 打倒學店 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion: zh:Wikipedia:元維基用戶查核協助請求#Howbunbun
冏@global
- List of users
- カブトカニ (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 典松園 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- 事件在今年發生 (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- CU log
- Discussion: none (Per zhwp local policy CUP#1, discussion unneeded for this kind of requests.)
Delarouvraie@fr.wiktionary
- List of users
- Delarouvraie (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Bianchi-Bihan (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
- Eszik (contr · deleted · block · log · block log · CA · guc · checkuser · lwcheckuser)
Reason(s): Regarding the accounts Delarouvraie & Bianchi-Bihan :
This request concerns mainly behavorial patterns and ways of contributing of these two accounts, that highly disrupted fr.wiktionary the past months.
It has been a while now, that these accounts have been engaged in creating polemics and conflicts, engaging other contributors into them. Those conflicts have, for some of them, made contributors stop participating to the project. Both accounts have exhausted valuable contributors—that have never caused problems in years—:
- By using the same methods to gain credibility among other contributors, that is they put themselves in the position of a person you want to defend, in order to better achieve their goals.
Regarding Bianchi-Bihan, they present themself they present themself as a speaker of Breton (br-4) speaking French at a very basic level (fr-1), whereas their French has appeared, at many occasions, to be at a native level ([9], [10], etc.). It is therefore likely that the person using this account tries to create a fake profile to limitate any similarity between the sockpuppets. This account also uses contributors' talk pages to put pressure on the contributors they are in conflict with, to avoid direct dicussion (e.g. [11], [12], the latter having led a contributor stopping contributing because of harassment).
In the same way, Delarouvraie presents themself as a woman protecting the women's rights, modifying the definitions related to feminin terms, women, etc., which at first seems very respectable. At first only though, since his or her behavior in the community pages has shown at several occasions to be provocative, disrespectful towards other contributors ([13]), taking to task contributors that have never caused any conflict in the project, pointing e.g. their advanced age ([14], [15]). Delarouvraie also avoids frequently discussions, and prefers edit the pages directly, bypassing the other contributors' opinions ([16], [17]). - What is most important, both accounts have made other contributors abashed to the point of stopping contributing to the project:
Bianchi-Bihan made the only two regular contributors in Breton that fr.wiktionary had, give up their participation to the project ([18], [19]) - both contributors have accumulated 14,000+ contributions on fr.wiktionary without causing any issue on the project—Bianchi-Bihan has made around 400+ contributions. Delarouvraie made leave a new contributor ([20]) ; this contributor was brought by a contributor that absolutely never caused any single problem on the project, after 8+ years of contribution. The latter litterally felt ashamed ([21]) to have recommended the project to that new contributor.
This kind of harassing behaviors have not been seen in the project for years, and now they happen in the same period by two accounts that use the same harassing methods.
Moreover, these two accounts started being active on fr.wiktionary at about the same period.
Note that both Delarouvraie and Bianchi-Bihan have been blocked undefinitely on fr.wikipedia for (among other things) abusing of sockpuppets [22], [23].
Regarding Eszik: it has presumably been used to avoid the block of Delarouvraie, who was blocked for abuse of revocations on articles with similar content ([24]).
If it turns out that these accounts are technically related, this would save fr.wiktionary's administrators' time to moderate the discussions and the polemics these accounts launch continually. And this would be an excellent argument to convince users having left to come back and contribute peacefully. — Automatik (talk) 17:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)See also
- Archives:
- 2006
- 2007: 01, 07.
- 2008: 01, 03.
- 2009: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12.
- 2010: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12.
- 2011: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2012: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2013: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2014: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2015: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2016: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2017: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2018: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2019: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2020: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2021: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2022: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2023: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- 2024: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12
- CheckUser policy.
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation