Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions/2010-09

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Administrator access

Danzanjamts@mnwikipedia

Done. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 13:35, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Mahir78@tawikinews

Hello. I'd like to ask for permanent administrator/sysop status to User Mahir78, as a result of the voting process that has taken place in here. Mahir joined ta.wikinews in 2006, and avtively participates in maintenance since last year. Thank you.--Kanags 05:51, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. --dferg ☎ talk 06:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks.--Kanags 07:04, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Ooswesthoesbes@zeawikipedia

Zea has a bureaucrat, but he is mia. ♠ Troefkaart 14:05, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Hoi, je bent er wel erg snel bij. Nou verwacht ik geen problemen, maar toch wil ik op z'n minst een week wachten. Groet, Erwin 17:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Ik wilde dit net gaan uitvoeren, maar zie dat Steinbach eergister wel actief was. Vraag het dus eerst hem even. Als je geen reactie krijgt of naar de muur wordt gestuurd, zal ik het alsnog uitvoeren. --Erwin 20:21, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Jagwar@mg.wikipedia

Please Could you expand this for six months again ? It is for the maintenance of malagasy wikipedia (deletion, renaming, protection/unprotection, lock/unlock, unvandalizing, etc. ...). I am the only admin who can do that. Thanks in advance. --Jagwar 交談 homewiki 08:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

you have to notify the local community first, thanks--Nick1915 - all you want 15:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Vote and talk page added. So Done. Expires on 14 March 2010. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 00:35, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Bolo1910@ruwikiversity

Done--Shizhao 12:55, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

Maksim_L.@be.wikipedia

Thanks. --Maksim L. 09:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. Keep up the good work! --Mercy 09:12, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

MalTsilna@ttwikibooks

Please Bureaucrat access discussion of local edition on Tatar Wikibooks. In this project to date, no active bureaucrats, so the project can not develop. Thank you! —— Ильнар Шайдуллов 13:03, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Please put a link to the public discussion and vote. Thank you, --dferg ☎ talk 13:16, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
One vote (by and for yourself) and you haven't contacted the existing local bureaucrat yet (who is the only other admin on the project) at all. It's not very likely that your request will succeed without a significant number of regular contributors. Please see Requests for comment/Minimum voting requirements#Minimum requirements to elect Bureaucrats for more information. Kylu 04:23, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
User is personally asking for votes here. --dferg ☎ talk 23:24, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Canvassing is not the way to go. Per dferg, it is very unlikely you will not get a bureaucrat flag without an active community. Stewards should be able to handle bureaucratic tasks for now. I-20the highway 23:06, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Not done with notes:
  1. Bureaucrats are not required to form a community, a community is required to create bureaucrats. I really don't see how giving you the ability to rename users and promote bots and admins is going to draw people to your project. We can do that just fine until you've got a community in place.
  2. Canvassing for votes is usually a good way to ensure that whatever position you're trying to get, you won't get. Please don't do this in the future.
  3. It's generally a good idea to subst: your welcome template instead of simply placing it on user talkpages, as they tend to be highly used (or, will hopefully be in the future) and a small change will affect a great number of user talkpages.
Otherwise, please continue to build your content and community. Perhaps the next time you request bureaucratship, it can be granted. Kylu 12:15, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

CheckUser access

Mxn@viwiki

Vietnamese Wikipedia community has concensus on creating local CheckUser. We have voted for Mxn to be one of 2 CUs (another one is DHN@viwiki). You stewards please contact him directly to ask for his identity. Tân (talk) 07:04, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Mxn must identify himself to the Wikimedia Foundation. DHN must also do the same.--Shanel 08:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Faxed. Thanks for waiting. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 17:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Waiting for office confirmation. — Dferg 13:18, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, but we do not know how long it takes new CheckUser right? We (viwikipedia community), waited so long ... minhhuy*= 14:39, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Nobody here can do anything until the office posts receipt of the identification. Ionek 17:19, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
The fax was received, but was illegible. I emailed Mxn to notify him at that time. The office has not received an alternate method or better fax as of yet. Bastique ☎ call me! 22:19, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Might it be easier if the user scanned his ID and sent it as an email? Kylu 12:11, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay. I just faxed over a more legible copy. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 16:24, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Mxn, we still cannot locate it in the office (and I am here today). Would you please send it again, to the attention of Kristen Powell? Bastique ☎ call me! 21:54, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Snail-mailed a copy to the Foundation's P.O. Box on Friday. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 14:24, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
ID finally received and confirmed --dferg ☎ talk 20:14, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Done Shanel 00:38, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

DHN@viwiki

Vietnamese Wikipedia community has concensus on creating local CheckUser. We have voted for DHN to be one of 2 CUs (another one is Mxn@viwiki). You stewards please contact him directly to ask for his identity. Tân (talk) 07:04, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

See above.--Shanel 08:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Should I wait for the confirmation request or should I send my confirmation letter ASAP? DHN 18:11, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Send your identification ASAP. only after the foundation confirms, this will be decided. --Jyothis 18:24, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Identification sent. DHN 07:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
I sent an email with my ID info several days ago to secure-info@wikimedia.org but haven't heard anything back. Is that the correct email address I should send it to or is there another one? DHN 04:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello DHN. Your ID were received and confirmed by Cary, but per CheckUser policy there must be at least 2 checkusers on a wiki or none at all so until Mxn identifies we can't promote you. Once his ID is confirmed, we will promote you both. Thanks, — Dferg ☎ 12:58, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Done Shanel 00:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Frank@enwiki

 On hold Waiting for ID Kylu 03:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Done ID received so access granted. --dferg ☎ talk 20:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

MuZemike@enwiki

Done Kylu 03:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Tiptoety@enwiki

Done Kylu 03:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Tnxman307@enwiki

Done Kylu 03:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Hersfold@enwiki

Done Kylu 03:24, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Ks aka 98@jawiki

Please CheckUser access, discussion of local election on Japanese Wikipedia. Thank you! --Carkuni 11:18, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

 On hold Awaiting identification Kylu 17:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Done. LeinaD (t) 11:18, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Oversight access

Beeblebrox@enwiki

 On hold Waiting for ID Kylu 03:26, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Done ID received, access granted. Kylu 17:02, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

LessHeard vanU@enwiki

 On hold Waiting for ID Kylu 03:26, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Done - ID received so access granted. --dferg ☎ talk 19:23, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Phantomsteve@enwiki

Done Kylu 03:26, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Avraham@commonswiki

Successful OV election. Kanonkas 12:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. --Mercy 13:02, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Belated thanks :) -- Avi 02:19, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Removal of access

Mike.lifeguard@enwikibooks

Please remove my admin & crat bits.  – mike@meta:~$  13:18, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Done, sadly... --dferg ☎ talk 19:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Mike.lifeguard@meta

Please remove my admin, checkuser, and oversight bits.  – mike@meta:~$  13:29, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Done
Changed group membership for User:Mike.lifeguard from CheckUsers, Oversighters, Stewards and Administrators to Stewards (As per own request on RfP, see http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=2114181&oldid=2114173&rcid=2224878 - Steward bit unchanged!)
My comments, thanks and further wishes kept for the Stewards' mailing list. --M/ 13:34, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Gribeco@ptwiki

Done --dferg ☎ talk 10:49, 10 September 2010 (UTC)


Chunky Rice@en.wikipedia

Please remove administrator bit due to inactivity. --Chunky Rice 23:37, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. LeinaD (t) 23:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

תומר א.@hewiki

I contributed my share. תומר א. 18:37, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Done --dferg ☎ talk 18:44, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. I don't know how to archive here. תומר א. 20:21, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Don't worry about it, we've got some clerks to do that already. :) Kylu 12:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Marskell@enwiki

I am an Arbitrator. -- KnightLago 23:00, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Done --თოგო (D) 23:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Alexander_Gouk@be.wikipedia

Please remove the status of the sysop. --Maksim L. 09:02, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Rights removed. Please inform the user. --Mercy 09:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Astap@be.wikipedia

Please remove the status of the sysop. --Maksim L. 09:02, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Rights removed. Please inform the user. --Mercy 09:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Redline@be.wikipedia

Please remove the status of the sysop. --Maksim L. 09:02, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Rights removed. Please inform the user. --Mercy 09:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Frieda@it.wikipedia

I resign as bureaucrat and admin.

Frieda 09:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Permissions removed. --dferg ☎ talk 11:26, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Adambro@mediawiki

Please remove my admin rights on mediawiki. I've never really been particularly active there and don't expect that to change. Thanks --Adambro 15:32, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for your help. :) Kylu 16:45, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Laser brain@enwiki

No longer active. --Laser brain 18:20, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Done --dferg ☎ talk 18:35, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Sv1xv@commons

Please remove my admin status on Commons. Thank you. --Sv1xv 14:18, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Done--Nick1915 - all you want 14:35, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Reaperman@cswikipedia

Remove my sysop flag on cs.wikipedia please. Thank you. --Reaperman 18:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. --dferg ☎ talk 18:54, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

AFriedman@en.wikiversity

I am requesting removal of my own tools, because I've changed my primary account. My new primary account is User:La_comadreja and I would like to transfer the tools to this account. Thanks. --AFriedman 01:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

So you're aware, we can remove your admin rights from AFriedman, but local bureaucrats will have to grant them to your new account. Please confirm that this change is allowable by your local bureaucrats first. Kylu 01:23, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Done the flag removal per your request, but the flag transfer is Not done here as you have to ask your local bureaucrats.Jusjih 02:40, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

ITurtle@ko.wikipedia

Remove my sysop and bureaucrat flag on ko.wikipedia. Thanks.--ITurtle 01:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Done by Shanel. --dferg ☎ talk 07:45, 5 September 2010 (UTC)


VirtualSteve@en.wikipedia

Logging the request on his behalf, as it appears Steve has left the building. -- 7 11:35, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Done --dferg ☎ talk 12:43, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Martin Kozák@cswikiquote

Two years of inactivity.
Danny B. 13:08, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. --Mercy 13:12, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Remigiu@angwiki

Inactive admin --fr33kman t - c 01:14, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. Please let them know their rights were removed. --Mercy 13:34, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Mercy, I'll take care of it personally. fr33kman t - c 02:41, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

James@angwiki

Inactive admin --fr33kman t - c 01:14, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. Please let them know their rights were removed. --Mercy 13:34, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks Mercy, I'll take care of it personally. fr33kman t - c 02:41, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Mike.lifeguard@meta

Please remove my steward rights on Meta & globally.  – mike@meta:~$  01:31, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Mike, we'll miss you. I-20the highway 03:02, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Mike, A million thanks for all the work you have done so far all over WMF. I hope you can return one day. I personally will miss you. Your request has been fullfiled, left you in the global_rollback usergroup.
Best regards, --dferg ☎ talk 15:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
It's sad , sad .... Mardetanha talk 03:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

زرشک@fawiki

Please remove my sysop access! Thank you.Zereshk 03:06, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for all your helps to the project , wish you best of luck Mardetanha talk 03:15, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
I also want to thank you for all the help you provided. Huji 22:34, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Done. --dferg ☎ talk 06:52, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Littlebtc@zh-wp

User no more active since more than seven months. Notification sent more than one month ago with no reaction. According to zh-wp rules please remove admin status.--Wing 10:40, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Done, please thank the user for his service. Laaknor 10:49, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Béotien lambda@frwikt

Thanks in advance. Béotien lambda 17:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Béotien lambda@frwikt

Thanks in advance. Béotien lambda 17:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

I-20@testwiki

My bureaucrat status was for a limited time, please remove it. --I-20the highway 20:08, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. Shanel 20:51, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Inactive admins@commons

Please remove rights for users not signed on commons:Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2010. --EugeneZelenko 14:54, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Could you please provide us with a list of them here? --Mercy 14:55, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Radomil
  • Korrigan
  • Timichal
  • Jcornelius
  • MECU
  • Forrester
  • Samulili
  • David.Monniaux
EugeneZelenko 14:54, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Done, thanks. --Mercy 14:59, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Fastily@en.wikipedia

Please remove my administrator access. Thanks, FASTILY (TALK) 18:15, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

I-20@jbowiktionary

Remove all rights. --I-20the highway 02:44, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Done--Nick1915 - all you want 11:48, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Maurice Carbonaro@scn.wikipedia

--Vituzzu 09:05, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Done--Nick1915 - all you want 11:38, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Wanderer999@fr Wikipedia

Removal of sysop rights. Reason: More than 6 months of inactivity.

Thanks in advance. Poppy 18:10, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Done Shanel 18:17, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Dake@fr Wikipedia

Removal of sysop rights. Reason: More than 6 months of inactivity.

Thanks in advance. Poppy 18:10, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Done Shanel 18:18, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Valérie75@fr Wikipedia

Removal of sysop rights. Reason: More than 6 months of inactivity.

Thanks in advance. Poppy 18:10, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Done --FiliP ██ 18:17, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Schiste@fr Wikipedia

Removal of sysop rights. Reason: More than 6 months of inactivity.

Thanks in advance. Poppy 18:10, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Done --FiliP ██ 18:17, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Mattb112885@en.wikibooks

Removal due to inactivity. Local policy justifying this is linked above and the local notice is also linked above. User received notice on talk page and via email. Additionally, user has implicitly resigned. --Adrignola 16:01, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. LeinaD (t) 13:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

ArtMechanic@de.wikipedia

all necessary local actions, according to the de.wp-conventions, are completed. thanks for assistance --Jan eissfeldt 13:19, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm very sorry to hear that. It's been done now. LeinaD (t) 13:34, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Tempodivalse@en.wikinews

Please remove all rights from my en.wikinews account, thanks. --Tempodivalse [talk] 01:12, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

We can remove the bureaucrat flag, please either remove the others yourself or have another bureaucrat do so. (Stewards: en.wikinews bureaucrats can remove admin/ipbe/reviewer flags). Also, you may want to consider removing the rights from your alternate account. Thanks. Let us know when you're done with the bureaucrat flag please? Kylu 01:17, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Ah yes, I had forgotten about all that. I have deflagged my alternate account and removed everything from my main account except for Bureaucrat. Thanks, Tempodivalse [talk] 01:34, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Done then. Thank you for your work. Kylu 01:42, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Fridae'sDoom@flaggedrevs/liquidthreads.labs

Per request. Thanks. sonia 09:11, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. --Mercy 09:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Shizhao@zh.wikipedia

Shizhao, the mightiest bureaucrat of zh.wikipedia, is using bots to do mass edits out of the range permitted, even running some bots without permissions. He asserts it should be acceptable and unnecessary to get permissions. He refused to stop his bots.

We don't have Arbitration Committee to judge this issue, so that we request Meta-Wiki to block his bots and investigate the fact of Shizhao's abuse of power. --百楽兎 02:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

You don't need an Arbitration Committee to have a working dispute resolution process. Local administrators and bureaucrats can block Shizhao and bots if requested to do so by the community. I'm afraid you have not linked to a local discussion or outcome of a dispute resolution process on your project, so we cannot perform rights changes based on your assertion. If you want to start a discussion on the matter, the ideal location would be locally, but you may do so at Meta's RFC if you'd like instead. At the moment, this is a clear Not done. Update us if your community has reached a consensus please. Kylu 02:39, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
orz, a bot permitted on Chinese wikipedia, base on trust, runing other tasks not required to re-permissions--Shizhao 12:21, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Googl@pl.wikipedia

Please remove sysop rights from my account. Googl 13:57, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. Thank you for your work. --Shizhao 14:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Pmlineditor@en.wikiversity and simple.wiktionary

I don't expect to be active in the recent future, so please remove sysop rights from my account on these two wikis. Thanks, Pmlineditor  16:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

simple.wiktionary bureaucrats can remove admin rights. To prevent massive outcry of abuse and the following death and destruction, mind asking one of them to remove your rights there real quick please? Kylu 16:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Done. Regards, Pmlineditor  16:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
The rights on simple.wiktionary have been removed by Tempodivalse (I was too slow). Thanks for your services there. -Barras 17:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Done for en.wikiversity. Kylu 17:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Juan de Vojníkov@cs.wikiversity

I would like to ask for "sysops" and "crats" rights removal on Czech Wikiversity. Its time to retire. Thanks!--Juan de Vojníkov 22:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Done Thank you for your time with the project. I hope you can stay around and help the project in the future. --Jyothis 22:55, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

hanberke@tk.wikipedia

Please grant me 6-month temporary sysop status which expired on 3 March 2010. I had three temporary terms up to now. I was the only sysop there. Thanks in advance. --Hanberke 09:43, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Sure, why not. Expires 3 September 2010. Kylu 00:25, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Removed --dferg ☎ talk 06:48, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

hanberke@tk.wiktionary

Please extend my 6-month temporary sysop status for another 6 months. --Hanberke 09:47, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Sure, why not. Expires 3 September 2010. Kylu 00:26, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Removed --dferg ☎ talk 06:48, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

putnik@ruwikinews

putnik 14:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Request refused - not enough voters. Candidate should be supported by local community (at least 3 users), but not only by one person two persons. LeinaD (t) 15:00, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Done. Request for permanent access has been changed into temporary access on 6 months. Expires 1 March 2010. LeinaD (t) 22:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
removed--Nick1915 - all you want 10:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
I request prolong putnik's rights in ruwikinews (as one user of this wiki): project need more admins. Thanks and regards, —Innv {ru-ws} 11:25, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Done Expires September 5th Laaknor 10:46, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
removed --dferg ☎ talk 15:00, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Jagwar@mg.wikipedia

I am requesting for a 6-month temporary sysop status. I am actually the only active sysop on this wiki . The three other sysops are inactive for at least five months or didn't have made a signifivative edit since Jan. 2010 ; and I need to unprotect the logo of the local wiki, and reprotect it when updating is done. Thanks, --Jagwar 交談 homewiki 13:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Is it possible to link to the discussion? Pmlineditor  13:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Also, notify the community before extension please. Pmlineditor  13:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
For local notification, look at here. --Jagwar 交談 homewiki 10:19, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
How many days should I wait before having sysop rights ? --Jagwar 交談 homewiki 12:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Seven, usually. Sukida 12:57, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
OK --Jagwar 交談 homewiki 09:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 05-10-2010. -- @lestaty discuţie 10:29, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
removed --dferg ☎ talk 15:00, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Could you expand this for six months again ? It is for the maintenance of malagasy wikipedia (deletion, renaming, protection/unprotection, lock/unlock, unvandalizing, etc. ...). I am the only admin who can do that. Thanks in advance. --Jagwar 交談 homewiki 08:19, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Iniquity@ruwikibooks

Good afternoon, again. I have requests for adminship in Russian Wikibooks. You have given to me temporary sysopship. And it had ended. Can I ask to hand me permanent sysopship? - Iniquity 16:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Comment Comment I don't think perm sysop is granted with one !vote. Pmlineditor  16:42, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Comment Comment It seems that the request was placed as on 10th March. I would like to see the election run locally (for atleast a week) and have more votes on the page. --Jyothis 16:59, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
Agreed - need to wait at least a week and look at discussion page again. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 15:14, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Week has passed. - Iniquity 10:20, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Done --- @lestaty discuţie 12:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. Is it permanent sysopship? - Iniquity 12:56, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Iniquity, Community elected sysopships are permanent (read - as long as community wishes) --Jyothis 13:18, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
sorry 4 vote isn't really enough for permanent adminship , this should be another temp one maybe abit longer --Mardetanha talk 13:21, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
I do not see problems in a permanent sysopship, I think four votes is the most we can expect from a small community. In addition, the user shown responsibility with the sysop tools. ---- @lestaty discuţie 13:51, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
The issue isn't about the user can be trusted or not, but if the community can be trusted to remove the rights from the user if the admin is inactive or misbehaves. 4 users isn't a big enough community for that. Laaknor 15:53, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Usually in small projects, the most we can expect is 4 or 6 votes (except and obvious in en-projects where the minimum number of votes will always be more than 15/20). I agree with the question of removal cited by Laknor, but I strengthening the point of user has already been a sysop on the project, and that was why I grant the permanent sysop (based on other cases). However today (and apparently) four votes is not enough. For this reason and for the reasons stated above, I am changing the request for temporary sysopship, with expiration on 18 September 2010. Regards and my sincere apologies to Iniquity.
Done Granted temporary sysopship, expire on 18 September 2010. Regards --- @lestaty discuţie 17:53, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Teak@hywikisource

Thank you! ― Teak 17:30, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Done temp sysop extended for 6 months. Expires Sept 25, 2010. --Jyothis 17:35, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Removed the expired flag, now with no local administrator. Please reapply if you want. Best wish.Jusjih 02:48, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

सरोज_कुमार_ढकाल@newikibooks

(thanks ) सरोज कुमार ढकाल 07:14, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Saroj, Though there are no admins, please start an RfA page and conduct a voting. As there are not many active users, you may consider Temp adminship as an alternative. Do let us know. Thanks!--Jyothis 12:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much , I have created the Rfa page in my talk page here.. and I found that I need to change the logo and also the title of the main page ...can you please guide me through the process how can I acquire atleast temporary adminship ? I will try my best ... --सरोज कुमार ढकाल 17:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Saroj, Please move the RfA to the local Village Pump (If you dont have one, you may start one modelling the En Wiki page). If you cant, please place the RfA on the talk of main page. Let the RfA stand for a week and we will grant a temp adminship. Thanks --Jyothis 19:36, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

I have moved the page Rfa page to the talk page of the main page as you have advised me ..thanks for guiding me ..--सरोज कुमार ढकाल 21:23, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Done Temp adminship granted till 09-27-2010 --Jyothis 15:57, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

removed --dferg ☎ talk 14:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

nepaboy@ne.wikipedia.org

Hi. I am near native speaker of nepali language and I am contributing on nepali wikipedia from a long time. I was registrate here on nepali wikipedia on 7 Aug. 2007 and my user ID is 367. I have edit here more than 2,356 and now want to adminship on nepali wikipedia. Nepaboy 16:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Comment Comment Three votes are not enough to grant permanent adminship in a project, especially on a wiki of this small size. However, considering your contribution to the project, I am inclined to grant a temp adminship for 3 months instead. Please let us know if that would be acceptable. --Jyothis 16:18, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

There are more than 3000 users on nepali wikipedia but only few users are active and regular. How many vote i need minimum? --Nepaboy 17:27, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Done for 3 months to expire on 2010-09-27. No definite rule specifies minimum votes to get permanent flag, but having just 50 active users and 3 supporting votes do not warrant permanent flag.--Jusjih 20:34, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
removed --dferg ☎ talk 14:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Miscellaneous requests

Qbot@viwiki

Please grant import rights to Qbot@viwiki. At first, we need to import thousands of templates from here and here. I'm a sysop from viwiki. Thank you. Nguyễn Thanh Quang 10:08, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

I see the vote started on 2010-09-10. Perhaps waiting for a few more days will be better.Jusjih 03:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Done. Best wish for your project.Jusjih 00:50, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Ooswesthoesbes@incubator

I request import access. Policy link: [8] --OosWesThoesBes 17:40, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Done. --Erwin 17:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC)