Steward requests/Permissions/2012-08

Please do not post any new comments on this page. This is a discussion archive first created in August 2012, although the comments contained were likely posted before and after this date. See current discussion.

odisha1@wiktionary

request for syop --Srikant Kedia 16:59, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Done One year of temporary adminship granted. Expires on 3 August 2013. --Millosh (talk) 01:13, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

მარგალონა@xmfwiki

I want to request admin rights. --მარგალონა (talk) 13:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. Supported by four established users on a small wiki written in language spoken by 500k speakers (see Mingrelian language). --Millosh (talk) 00:50, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Orel Beilinson@yi.wiktionary

Most admins were last active around 2008. Needs new admins urgently. I am a linguist and a near-native speaker of the language and an experienced Wikipedia editor and Mediawiki administrator. Needs complete cleanup of sysops. Orel Beilinson (talk) 21:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

on hold until 6 August 2012. I would suggest that adding user and user talk pages at these sites would be of value. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:08, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Orel Beilinson@ang.wikipedia

No admins at all and needs some maintenance work. Needs new admins urgently. I am a linguist, I have learnt the language and an experienced Wikipedia editor and Mediawiki administrator. Also for Old English Wiktionary (ang.wiktionary) Orel Beilinson (talk) 21:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

on hold until 6 August 2012. I would suggest that adding user and user talk pages at these sites would be of value. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:08, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

For Old English Wikipedia but not Wiktionary,  Granted for 1 month to expire on 2012-09-07. Your link to Old English Wiktionary discussion actually points to Wikipedia, so I mark it not done, but you may still correct it. Thanks.-- Jusjih (talk) 08:13, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Updated the Old Englisc Wiktionary. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Orel Beilinson (talk) 08:42, 7 August 2012

I'm not sure if this was a good idea. He gave himself an IP block exempt and deleted pages with content which were there for years, see here. Trijnstel_talk 10:41, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

I don't know I can leave my humble opinion, I also concern about it. Although he just becomes temporary sysop, he does unnecessary sysop actions. I hope that such action is just his green behavior. Sotiale (Talk·Contribs) 11:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

I gave myself IP block exempt because I travel a lot and sometimes get autoblocked for open proxies, just like here on Meta. I've deleted pages that were spam, duplicate of other pages (Old English pages can be written in Runes or in Latin scripts, and those who are supposed to be runes but are just duplicated of the Latin script are deleted) or those which are not in Old English. The wiki has been stranded for a while, so I'm doing what a sysop should've done as it happened.--Orel Beilinson (talk) 12:44, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Due to credible concerns of your administrator actions, I am provisionally reversing your Old English Wikipedia flags, pending further reviews by other stewards. If other stewards can trust you, they will grant you flags. Considering the conflict of interest, next time, please ask us to grant IP block exempt with administrator flag, rather than doing it by yourself as the only administrator on Old English Wikipedia. For Old English Wiktionary, on hold until August 14, 2012.--Jusjih (talk) 15:02, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

┌────────────────┘
Not done, per user's apparent withdrawal. Archiving here. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:14, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Zylbath@nds.wiktionary

Done. One year of temporary adminship. Expires on 5 August 2013. User looks like the only one active on the wiki. (For the record: permissions wasn't changed.) --Millosh (talk) 02:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Please make a log. It's cheap and saves folks time finding the archives. — MA (audiencia) 09:25, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

He did make a log, see Steward requests/Permissions/Approved temporary#Zylbath@nds.wiktionary. Trijnstel_talk 10:28, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

I mean here. — MA (audiencia) 10:34, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

You mean that it's necessary to remove and give permissions for the log? If so, I'll do that. --Millosh (talk) 00:56, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Yup, that's what he meant. Trijnstel_talk 14:16, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. --Millosh (talk) 07:23, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Sarrus@dawiktionary

I have consensus to continue as sysop.
- Sarrus (c • t) 14:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. Extended up to 10 August 2013. --Millosh (talk) 16:05, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Calak@ckb.wikipedia

We have a small wiki with a few active users and unfortunatly we have no active administrator. As you can see from the discussion link, voting is over and the results are 4 supportive votes, 1 abstention vote without against votes (8 days: 1 August-9 August). Please do what you should do. Thank you very much.--Calak (talk) 00:03, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Excuse me! Who is responsible here?--Calak (talk) 19:26, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

@fellow stewards: Since this projects already have 2 permanent administrators, is permanent flag appropriate? --Bencmq (talk) 11:28, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Which administrators do you mean? We don't have active administrator, for example see Candidates_for_speedy_deletion.--Calak (talk) 12:30, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

@Ben: I also thought about this this morning, and considering 5 votes, 4 supports and one oppose = 80%, which usually is a pass on most projects and per the fact that the wiki already has two admins, I would also grant permanent permission here. -Barras talk 19:05, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Agreed with Barras. One admin inactive for more than a week; the other for more than a month. 4:0:1 seems like reasonable positive outcome for a small wiki. --Millosh (talk) 19:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

BTW, 4:0:1 is usually treated as 100%. --Millosh (talk) 19:08, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh sorry, I made an oppose out of the neutral. This way it is even better, I think a permanent flag would warranted. -Barras talk 19:16, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Your replay had me stuck. We don’t have active administrator and we need administrator now. Admin Aza left a message for me that I can't be active ([4]). For reasons I candidate for administration and users supported me. Now what am I suppose to do?--Calak (talk) 19:56, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

You don't need to do anything, we were just discussing whether we should give you the right permanently or just temporary. However, I just granted you the right permanently now. Have fun with your new mop. -Barras talk 20:02, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much.--Calak (talk) 20:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Soul Train@lez.wikipedia

I've successfully confirmed status of a permanent administrator. Soul Train (talk) 10:16, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. -Barras talk 19:03, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Maksat

Hi friends, I would like you to give me consent to continue my powers in the administration ky.wikipedia. If it is possible for the long term. Late in August I will not have the status of the administrator. Thank you in advance.

 On hold until 11 August. Maksat, please ask locally for confirmation at least 8 days before the expiration date. You'll get one year this time if other users from ky.wp are fine with that. --Millosh (talk) 21:11, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Millosh, I have already appealed to the local community, here is the link: discission for administration for Kyrgyz Wikipedia. Thank you,Maksat (talk) 05:45, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

I saw that, but we need to wait more than one day to see if everybody agrees with your adminship. Usually, it's 7 full days. This time I shortened the process on five days because you'd lose admin permissions on 12 August. Next time, please, make the local request at least 8 days before the expiration date for your adminship. --Millosh (talk) 07:42, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh sorry, I did not know, next time I will write in advance, Maksat (talk) 06:30, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. Enough of time passed. User has support by three native speakers and likely the only active users presently. Lasts until 12 August 2013. --Millosh (talk) 23:24, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Arnaugir@ca.wikiquote

I have been administrator for 6 months and I'd like my tenure to be extended indefinitely. We haven't had any kind of problem and we are growing, luckily! Thank you.Arnaugir (talk) 08:59, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Done granted to 15 Feb 2013 fr33kman 15:40, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Idh0854@ko.wikinews

Hello, Dear steward. Because some problem is occurring, I request for judging this case. This discussion started 2011.8.27. It has proceeded until 2012.8.1. Because Devunt, as a temporary sysop, closed it as successful election. But Devunt's temporary sysop privilege was expired 2011.9.13. His expired day is wrong classified:Steward_requests/Permissions/Approved_temporary#Devunt.40kowikinews (Now, his sysop privilege removed). Better or not, this discussion closed by him and support rate result is 72.2%. Korean Wikinews don't have a rule about admin election. However, Korean Wikinews follow tacit consensus; If enough support rate is verified, any user do SRP. IMHO, It means respecting steward's judgement. But as far as I know, minimum support rate is 75%. (reference: his request rejected 2 times; here and here). I don't know what can I do. This election is rejected? or passed? I request that solving this problem. Thank you for your hard work. Regards, Sotiale (Talk·Contribs) 11:48, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

• Comment: Sotiale contacted with me about this and I gave him/her my personal opinion and also I suggested him/her to ask here for a formal reply. Our full conversation can be found here (permanent link). -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:02, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

• I've reviewed the discussion and the local elections page at [7]. I do not see a local policy or practice to deviate from the 75% threshold. The current discussion did not reach 75% in support. Therefore, I am marking this as not done for lack of community consensus. MBisanz ^talk 16:41, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Maax@sowiki

(Hi, I have been granted many times temporary adminship to sowiki. There are no other active local adminstrators. I would like to request to become a bureaucrat or Steward if possible. Otherwise a check user and prolonged admin will be great thank you ) Maax (talk) 08:28, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

There seems to be a bit of a confusion here. Stewards are elected annually by the Wikmedia community at large and are not appointed/elected for each local wiki. Check Users are elected by local communities and require certain very specific voting requirements which you can find at Check user. Bureaucrats are elected by the local community when there is a need, sowiki is a very small community with no active administrators, as such it doesn't have a need or the necessary community size for a 'crat to be appointed. I suggest that you merely seek a one year extension of your at this time. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 15:16, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Ok Snowolf, thanks for your information. I think one year adminship is fine thank you Maax (talk) 06:39, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Done for one year until 31 August 2013. Ruslik (talk) 07:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Tamara Ustinova@vepwiki

Hello! I propose here for a second time to grant me one more temporary administrator's access in Veps Wikipedia. I'm active in this project, but I'm a bit tired of it, and I can't promise that I'll be active after the access (that's why I don't want to have a "full" adminship). :) Local discussion (written in Russian & Veps) has been created some days ago. Thank you.--Tamara Ustinova (talk) 08:01, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Magister Mathematicae@es.wikiquote

Back in March, a discussion on esquote village pump resulted on consensus that (following same pattern as the other spanish wikis), bureaucrat flags would be given to sysops. LINK.

There are only 2 local bureaucrats, the most active having only 2 edits in the current year. I contacted him on june LINK asking him to implement community consensus. After having no reply, I prodded him back in July LINK. Another month has passed with no result.

I think this is a clear case of no local active bureaucrats, therefore I request stewards to implement consensus that has been pending for 5 months. I request either the bureaucrat flag being given to all sysops directly, or it being given to me and I will perform the rest of changes locally (I'm a local sysop there). es:Magister Mathematicae 22:24, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

I've informed esquote village pump about this request. LINK. es:Magister Mathematicae 22:52, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

https://toolserver.org/~pathoschild/stewardry/?wiki=es.wikiquote — Wouldn't be better to give it just to the active administrators? Inactive people doesn't need any rights at all IMHO. Just a comment which I'll post at eswikiquote too. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:08, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Done This can be best taken care of by MM himself. As such I've granted the crat flag as 'no active crats' to MM for him to implement. fr33kman 15:52, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Just a procedural question. If we require at least 10-15 votes in general to promote a person to bureaucrat status, here with just 4 votes MM has promoted all admins in a wiki to bureaucrat status which look certainly odd for me. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 11:48, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

You're right... That's odd. Trijnstel_talk 12:59, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

There was a local discussion and consensus, and it should have been resolved without steward intervention.

Es wikiquote did have permanent bureaucrats who should have enacted such change (even with 4 votes) and stewards could not impede it. The only problem was that local bureaucrats were missing, and the only request for stewards was to fulfill the bureaucrat task due to they being away.

It was not asked for stewards to "decide" to grant permanent bureaucratship on a wiki with no bureaucrats. It was only asked to complete a local request that had 5 months pending plainly visible on the wiki's village pump and which no one in the community had objected for several months.

Please don't misunderstand me Marco, but the decision to validate the voting was not put upon stewards, only the implement what local bureaucrats should have done several months ago. es:Magister Mathematicae 15:51, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

No te estoy criticando Magister y creo que la intención es buena, pero ciertamente me parece injusto que para los usuarios que vienen aquí a pedir estado de burócrata los rechacemos porque sus wikis son pequeñas y no tienen suficiente número de votos y sin embargo a tí con solo cuatro votos se te haya otorgado estado de burócrata para que tú luego promuevas a todo el equipo de administradores (lo cual es algo exclusivamente local y que se ha decidido allí, cierto; ahí no digo nada *aquí*). Yo personalmente hubiese rechazado este pedido en base a los anteriores precedentes. Lo hecho, hecho está; y no quiero contribuir a elevar la posible tensión que esta solicitud pudiese generar. Pero últimamente tengo la sensación de que aquí se están haciendo las cosas a golpe de "porque yo lo valgo" y eso es algo con lo que yo no puedo estar de acuerdo. Un saludo. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:00, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

You also posted on the pump (after the changes) that you feel inactive sysops should not be promoted to bureaucrats. However I must point that local consensus was to promote "all sysops", not "promote only active sysops", and such it was not my right to decide whom to promote or not, only implement (locally) the local consensus (which was: promote all sysops).

If you feel that inactive sysops should not be bureaucrat, please achieve such consensus locally and it will be implemented. Meanwhile, removing them would have no ground on local policies or consensus. es:Magister Mathematicae 15:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

I already commented that issue over there. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 16:06, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

TariButtar@pa.wiki

TariButtar (talk) 09:23, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

In principle, requests for bureaucrat access need local consensus. Please suggest local discussion. Without it, Stewards cannot grant 'Crat access to you. Sotiale (Talk·Contribs) 09:48, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Please note, that a vote to be successful, there should be at least 10 to 15 supports. When there are only a very few voters/contributors on the projects, we may not grant local bureaucrat rights. -Barras talk 12:08, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Add the fact that this user is a temporary administrator for three months hence Not done -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:34, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Elph@arwikipedia

The nomination has been running for one week with 28 support and two struck votes. --Meno25 (talk) 11:07, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

 On hold pending identification. -- Mentifisto 11:35, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Identification document was sent--Elph (talk) 12:00, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

Granted Identification received and access granted Mardetanha ^talk 17:38, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot --Elph (talk) 17:41, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Lucien leGrey@eswikipedia

After the users elected in the linked page get their oversight rights, please restore Lucien leGrey's. (His rights were taken temporarily because he was the only oversighter left in es.wikipedia.) Thanks. --Angus (talk) 12:03, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

 On hold pending requests for the rest of the oversighters. Laaknor (talk) 12:09, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Done, two are confirmed. —DerHexer (Talk) 14:11, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Platonides@eswikipedia

Per the linked discussion, I have been elected oversighter at es.wikipedia with User:Cheveri. This unblocks above request for restoration of oversight access for Lucien. My entry at Identification noticeboard. - Platonides (talk) 13:23, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Question: Why were you and Cheveri, instead of Antur, elected? I counted the results and I had a different conclusion:

Platonides - 98,2% (55 supports, 1 oppose)

Antur - 93,2% (41 supports, 3 opposes)

Cheveri - 90% (63 supports, 7 opposes)

The support-oppose ratio is higher for Antur than for Cheveri, while Cheveri got more supports. Trijnstel_talk 14:00, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Because we order by vote difference (pos-neg) and not ratio. --Angus (talk) 14:03, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

You mean you count the votes, instead of the percentages? Anyway I just found it in the policy (Oversight policy#Access). Trijnstel_talk 14:05, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

We count everything, but to determine who will be elected, we order the candidates by vote difference: positive votes ("supports") minus negative votes ("opposes"). Do you understand now? --Angus (talk) 14:08, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

(after ec) Sorry for the misunderstanding. Yes, you're right. Anyway, DerHexer restored the rights - I got an edit conflict. :) Trijnstel_talk 14:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Done, two are confirmed. —DerHexer (Talk) 14:11, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Cheveri@eswikipedia

See the requests above.  On hold pending identification. Trijnstel_talk 14:07, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Done —DerHexer (Talk) 18:58, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Swedish Wikipedia

On the Swedish Wikipedia all admins/bureaucrats/CU/OS are elected for one year at a time, see the policy document. There exists a possibility to be reelected, but some users choose not to apply for another period. To get reelected at least 75 percent support is required. --MagnusA (talk) 05:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Athn@svwiki

Sysop flag can be removed. --MagnusA (talk) 05:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 10:27, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Calle@svwiki

Sysop flag can be removed. --MagnusA (talk) 05:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 10:27, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Elfsborgarn@svwiki

Sysop flag can be removed. --MagnusA (talk) 05:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 10:27, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Frökennostalgi@svwiki

Sysop flag can be removed. --MagnusA (talk) 05:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 10:27, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Gaisjonke@svwiki

Sysop flag can be removed. --MagnusA (talk) 05:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 10:27, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Natox@svwiki

Sysop flag can be removed. --MagnusA (talk) 05:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 10:27, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Popperipopp@svwiki

Sysop flag can be removed. --MagnusA (talk) 05:12, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 10:27, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

अनुनाद सिंह@hiwikipedia

Continuously attacking multiple users (violating fourth point ("Editors should interact with each other in a respectful and civil manner") of the Panchsheel (local fundamental principles, similar to five pillars)), making ethnic comments, using inflammatory language, not following local policies, engaging in aggressive point-of-view editing. User has accepted all the allegations against him and has supported the proposal ("मैं अपना मत इस प्रस्ताव के समर्थन में देता हूँ। अर्थात अनुनाद सिंह को प्रबन्धक पद से मुक्त किया जाय और विकिपिडिया पर उन्हें प्रतिबन्धित किया जाय।" — "I give my support in favour of this proposal. Meaning, अनुनाद सिंह should be relieved of his administrator status/post and be blocked from Wikipedia).--Bill william compton (talk) 15:24, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Invalid reason for stewards. Please, make decision locally and then ask stewards to remove permissions. --Millosh (talk) 09:41, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Reopening. Apparently they did so, by the page he's linked above. CC Jyothis who can speak lil' indi for our assistance. — MA (audiencia) 10:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Obviously, I should read more carefully... --Millosh (talk) 10:26, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

I will read thru and let you know. --Jyothis (talk) 11:20, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

For what it's worth, this is not a rationale for de-sysoping. This is the summary of what is written there. Please take the disciplinary action as requested because he's just not stopping. Referring "crocodile tears" to people [in his latest comment] is farther away from civilized behaviour, which one could expect at any encyclopaedia, thank you and best regards.--Bill william compton (talk) 03:31, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for a delayed response over here, as I was a bit busy after Wikimania. At this point, I do not see consensus in the discussion to honor this request. More over, reading over the issues, apart from a bit of a harsh tongue from the user in question, I don't see enough evidence provided to cause the user to be de-sysoped and blocked from the project under an emergency action. One should provide more concrete evidences over misuse of rights or blatant personal attacks in order to support such a request, especially when it is made against one of the more experienced editors in the project.

Bill should also note that before coming up with such a request here, consensus should be reached in the discussion and enough time should have passed in order to allow the local users to make comments. The request here was made a day after the discussion started. Also note that partially quoting some one's statement without giving the context does seems like he is accepting all of it and asking himself to be blocked, but in reality, user stated that he does accept that he has told all those, but all statement should be taken in its context.

Thanks, and let me know if anyone has further questions.--Jyothis (talk) 20:10, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Progress report? has the community reach a consensus? Bencmq (talk) 09:07, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Not done please come back if there is an update to the situation. Bencmq (talk) 03:01, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Obelix@dawikibooks

Plaese remove my sysopflag. --Obelix (talk) 19:49, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Question: It'll be expire automatically in December, but you want to quit earlier I assume? Trijnstel_talk 19:58, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

I know, but please remove my sysopflag imediatley. Obelix (talk) 19:59, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Done and thanks for the help. I assume this block on svwiki for sockpuppetry was the cause of it...? Trijnstel_talk 20:06, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

It is possible, but I see no reason for Obelix to quit edit on any other project if he wants to. I am not aware of any problematic X-wiki-behavior. But it is more likely better for him to restart with a clean record. -- Lavallen 08:35, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Faramarz@fawikinews

Please remove my sysop flag because I'm busy in real life and can't be an useful admin anymore, Thanks. --Faramarz^♚♔♚ 15:30, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Done and thanks for your help! Trijnstel_talk 14:20, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Teemeah@huwiki

Teemeah had a temporary bit to maintain and clear images on huwiki. Now the community and her had ended this. Thanks. - RepliCarter (talk) 19:51, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. Hungarian checked with native speaker :) --Millosh (talk) 16:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

FollowTheMedia@it.wiktionary

I'm requesting the removal of my transwiki importer flag because I don't have enough time to keep on importing articles from it.wikipedia to it.wiktionary. Your remarks. --FollowTheMedia (talk) 16:56, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 19:02, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Arruah@kk.wikipedia

I removed the administrator flag of this user based on the above mentioned discussion. Ruslik (talk) 18:57, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Reytan@pl.wikipedia

Due to our policy, I hereby request removal of sysop acces due to inactivity in main namespace longer than one year. User has been notified two weeks earlier. Elfhelm (talk) 21:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 21:11, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Orioane@ro.wikipedia

Inactive for over a year. Local policy does not allow sysops to be inactive for more than a year. --Andrei Stroe (talk) 08:00, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Done — billinghurst sDrewth 08:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

maihudon@mr.wikipedia

No need to do anything at this time since it is just one user. You may choose to have your admin rights removed or the community may choose. We cannot take the word of a single person against you. --Daniel Mayer (mav) (talk) 00:00, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

I want my admin rights to be removed, My_Last_Post_on_Marathi_Wikipedia. I will not be active on marathi wikipedia today onwards. (Maihudon, Marathi Wikipedia) — The preceding unsigned comment was added by Maihudon (talk)

Done, thanks for your time and efforts at mrwiki. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:28, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Mido@ar.wikipedia

Hello, I want my checkuser access to be removed. Thanks :) --Mido (talk) 00:13, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Removed. please inform the relevant mailing lists so you can be desuscribed. es:Magister Mathematicae 02:09, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Wic2020@id.wikipedia

Please removed Wic2020 sysop status was abolished in accordance with the consensus that we have done. Wagino 20100516 (talk) 11:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. Trijnstel_talk 22:37, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

GerardM, Levenius, Polyglot, SabineCretella, Tvdm and Walter@nlwiktionary

The Dutch wiktionary has a policy that requires a minimum activity of 50 edits for sysops. The policy is present since the early beginning of the wiki, but was apparently not looked after. 6 of nl.wiktionary sysops do not meet this requirement and after a discussion on the wiki, I'd ask for the removal of sysop and (if present) bureacrat flags from the accounts:

To conclude I would like to thank these people and express my appreciation for what they did to the wiki. --Annabel (talk) 10:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 12:34, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Cbrown1023, Lestath, Lukasz Lukomski, ShakataGaNai, Slomox @ Wikimedia Commons

Due to our inactivity policy (criterion #3), I hereby request the removal of administrator rights from the aforementioned users. They have all been listed in the previous inactivity run and failed to perform the required number of admin actions in the past six months (see exact statistics). Thanks in advance, odder (talk) 10:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Done by MarcoAurelio earlier today. Trijnstel_talk 19:31, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Done --M/ (talk) 19:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Done --M/ (talk) 19:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Done --M/ (talk) 19:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Done --M/ (talk) 19:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Sergei 1207@jawiki

This user is inactive for 3 months. Please remove sysop rights from this user, as per local de-sysop policy for inactivity. --Hosiryuhosi (talk) 16:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. -- Mentifisto 16:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Snow steed@jawiki

This user is inactive for 3 months. Please remove sysop rights from this user, as per local de-sysop policy for inactivity.--Hosiryuhosi (talk) 11:29, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Done --Bencmq (talk) 11:48, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Smooth_O@bswiki

As the policy says, any user account with CheckUser status that is inactive for more than a year will have their CheckUser access removed. Smooth_O has not edited nor made a public log for more than a year. I have a reply from the OC stating that (s)he hasn't used the tool for more than two years now. As such I request that the policy be enforced and Smooth_O's CheckUser rights be removed. Thanks. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:34, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Removed Per policy. Mardetanha ^talk 17:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you - The user has been informed. Also the mailing list administrators for the relevant actions. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 17:53, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Petr Tomasovsky@eowiki

A ballot for removal of Petr's sysop rights has yet occured in last April. Petr received 6 voices against / 4 for removal.

A new ballot occured in August. Petr received 1 voice against / 8 voices for removal.

In his user and talk pages he lets know that "Wikipedia is dead for him".

The case is clear --Arno Lagrange ✉ 19:05, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Since two weeks, he has not yet passed. The request was made on August 10th. Following our rules, the request will be submitted after two weeks: so on August 24th. --Arno Lagrange ✉ 19:09, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Petr few times abused his admin rigths: In February, July and August.

• He protected his talk page meaning that Wikipedia is dead for him;
• He blocked user Pejno Simono twice for no reasons;
• He substituted texts of discussions from the same user (Pejno Simono) by template without reasons.

There are more reasons to remove his admin rights. Ĉiuĵaŭde (talk) 13:35, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Seeing the language above is somewhat erratic, I would like to point out the main issue. The current ballot on taking away this user's admin rights went 8:1 in favour of getting rid of him as an admin. He has on several occasions been grossly mis-using his powers as an admin. This second ballot ran for two weeks and in accordance with our local rules was closed today, 24th august, 2012. This means that herewith the request for his removal as an admin is now being placed officially. Therefore please be so kind as to remove the admin rights of user Petr Tomasovsky asap. --Pejno Simono (talk) 21:36, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Since User:ArnoLagrange is a local bureaucrat, this is Done --Bencmq (talk) 10:49, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

REX@id.wikipedia

Please remove REX sysop status was abolished in accordance with the consensus that we have done. Albertus Aditya (talk) 01:56, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 08:09, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Andrej Šalov@hr.wikisource

Please remove Andrej's admin and bureaucrat status. Unfortunately, Andrej died in 2009.--Ex13 (talk) 11:01, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Done. PeterSymonds (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Rsg@eswiki

This user is inactive for two years and according to the policy, its sysop and bureaucrat flags must be removed. Thank you. BetoCG (talk) 16:29, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Done--Bencmq (talk) 16:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Odisha1@or.wiktionary

Request to grant admin rights again --Srikant Kedia 14:46, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Could you please post another notice requesting an extension of your admin rights? Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 14:48, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Not done at this time. Please first notify the community. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 01:17, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I was busy in Outreach, so just now opened the request. --Srikant Kedia 08:23, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks - Request on hold until 1 February 2012 to allow community input. --Daniel Mayer (mav) 01:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2012-08-01. Bencmq 01:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Expiration notification sent. --Bencmq (talk) 01:43, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Removed.--Jusjih (talk) 09:45, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

User Reza1615@fa.wiktionary

I have a request to extend my access on fa.wiktionary Reza1615 10:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Please kindly post a local notification about your extension of temp sysop. Thanks. Bencmq 04:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Shouldn't there be a voting? --Faofficer 10:28, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

On minor wikis is the process often less formal. You can still support, oppose or comment if you like. -- Lavallen 13:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

if you see the last changes I was the only active user at that wiki! please reactive my access also in minor wikis temporary adimn doesn't neeed voting also itis the last 3 moth voting!Reza1615 12:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Please post a local notification ( = announcement) about your extension. I'm not asking you to open a vote. Bencmq 12:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

‌I made an announcement hereReza1615 14:41, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

On hold until 2 February. Ruslik 11:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Reza1615 wrote that he was the only active user at that wiki. Ok! If there is no community why there is an admin needed? The local RfA announcement shows votes in favor of Reza1615; but these users aren't a member of the wiktionary community, if there is any. As far as I can see, Reza1615 is kind of a global admin in all persian projects. Is this ok? Please pay attention to rules and regulations! --Faofficer 18:33, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

The link is above, you should put your opinion about this user there. If your problem is with the procedure, not Reza1615 then start a discussion to change the rules and regulations. This is a request noticeboard, not a discussion space. Bencmq 14:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2012-08-02. Ruslik 06:58, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Expiration notification sent. --Bencmq (talk) 01:43, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

removed. Matanya (talk) 09:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

User Reza1615@fa.wiktionary

I have a request to extend my access on fa.wiktionary Reza1615 10:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Please kindly post a local notification about your extension of temp sysop. Thanks. Bencmq 04:08, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Shouldn't there be a voting? --Faofficer 10:28, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

On minor wikis is the process often less formal. You can still support, oppose or comment if you like. -- Lavallen 13:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

if you see the last changes I was the only active user at that wiki! please reactive my access also in minor wikis temporary adimn doesn't neeed voting also itis the last 3 moth voting!Reza1615 12:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Please post a local notification ( = announcement) about your extension. I'm not asking you to open a vote. Bencmq 12:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

‌I made an announcement hereReza1615 14:41, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

On hold until 2 February. Ruslik 11:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Reza1615 wrote that he was the only active user at that wiki. Ok! If there is no community why there is an admin needed? The local RfA announcement shows votes in favor of Reza1615; but these users aren't a member of the wiktionary community, if there is any. As far as I can see, Reza1615 is kind of a global admin in all persian projects. Is this ok? Please pay attention to rules and regulations! --Faofficer 18:33, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

The link is above, you should put your opinion about this user there. If your problem is with the procedure, not Reza1615 then start a discussion to change the rules and regulations. This is a request noticeboard, not a discussion space. Bencmq 14:43, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2012-08-02. Ruslik 06:58, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Expiration notification sent. --Bencmq (talk) 01:43, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

removed. Matanya (talk) 09:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Soul Train@lez.wikipedia

Hello. Project community already has decision. I would like to receive the flag for 3 months. It's not my home project, but I want to help it.--Soul Train (talk) 13:45, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2012-08-05. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 14:02, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Expiration notice sent. --Bencmq (talk) 01:45, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

removed by Matanya. Trijnstel_talk 12:10, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Tynchtyk Chorotegin@kywiki

As the Kyrgyz Wikipedia is growing with an increased activity, we require more personnel with administrative access to meet the needs of an expanding community and Wikipedia. The requests for adminship held a vote to give ky:user:Tynchtyk Chorotegin administrator access. The voting began December 21, 2011 with 3 YES and 0 NO votes. I request that ky:user:Tynchtyk Chorotegin be given administrator access. --Википедия 07:21, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2012-08-12. -- PeterSymonds (talk) 16:21, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Expiration notice posted on ky.wikipedia. Trijnstel_talk 12:15, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

removed. Matanya (talk) 06:53, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

User Arnaugir@cawikiquote

Please give, to this user (Arnaugir) the right of sysop and of bureaucrat. The project was dead and a new comunauty wants to give it a new life. We need new sysops and bureacrat on this project. Thank's.  Bertrand GRONDIN  → ^(Talk) 16:11, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2012-08-12. This is for adminship only, to expire in six months. However, bureaucrats are only appointed when the community is sufficiently large and established. It's hard to put a firm number, but usually between 10 and 15 votes are needed in favour, from people active on the project. In this case, most users are not active on cawikiquote, but on other wikis; so until the community grows, please direct bureaucrat requests to Steward requests. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 16:17, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Expiration notice posted on ca.wikiquote. Trijnstel_talk 12:15, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

removed. Matanya (talk) 06:53, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Arjunaraoc@te.wikisource

Need admin privilege to configure Proofread extension on Telugu Wikisource for about two months. The admins on the project are not active for a long time. The last time an admin was active was during April 2011 -- Arjunaraoc (talk) 08:15, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

How long do you need it ? -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 17:46, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

In the above request he said he needs it "for about two months" ... Trijnstel_talk 19:45, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Appears to be trusted user at tewiki, and I have been working with them at teWS to assist PrP which does require admin permissions, so I am inclined to support this. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:59, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

 Granted for 2 months to expire on 2012-08-13. Please let us know when you're done with configuring the Proofread extension. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 05:32, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

removed. Matanya (talk) 06:54, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

t.sujatha@te.wikisource

Need admin privilege to configure Proofread extension on Telugu Wikisource for about two months. The admins on the project are not active for a long time. The last time an admin was active was during April 2011 -- t.sujatha (talk) 13:19, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

As T.sujatha is a long time contributor to several Telugu wiki projects, I recommend giving her a longer term admin role rather than short term. --Arjunaraoc (talk) 09:51, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

 Granted for 2 months to expire on 2012-08-13. Please let us know when you're done with configuring the Proofread extension. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 05:32, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

removed. Matanya (talk) 06:54, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Amqui@iu.wikipedia

Good day, I'm requesting temporary admin on iu.wiki in order to do some maintenance including deleting a lot of pages because of pages' moving and editing protected pages. There is two bureaucrats/admins on iu.wiki, but both are inactive since 2006 and one of them specifically says on his user page that he's not admin ([9]). I already made several requests on the irc channel for global admin only for minor actions and both of the global admin and myself loose time in this process. I'm monitoring this wiki for vandalism almost on a daily basis. I'm already temporary admin on cr.wiki for the same purposes. I founded the Canadian Aboriginal Languages Wikipedia Coordination for the coordination and the monitoring of those small aboriginal wikis. My contributions on iu.wiki. Amqui 03:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2012-08-15. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi 04:32, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

That was quick, thanks you. Amqui 04:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

removed. Matanya (talk) 11:19, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Kompowiec2@plwikibooks

Please grant sysop rights for these users. The result of both votes is 3/0/0. Przemub (talk) 07:11, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

 Granted for 3 months to expire on 2012-08-20. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Quentinv57 ^(talk) 08:01, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

removed.Matanya (talk) 09:25, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Devunt@kowikinews

i had a temporary administrator of kowikinews, and User:Gapo has been new Administrator. but User:Gapo's last cont is on April, so I want manage the project again. Devunt 21:09, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

please start a local discussion. best Matanya 21:10, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

I added. --Devunt 16:06, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

on hold until 12.7.2011 Matanya 06:43, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Done to expire on 2011-09-12.--Jusjih 07:30, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Removed - I have been approached on my talk today because of this. Due to this request being placed in the incorrect place this had to be removed earlier. I've been looking for an extension or something in the archives but found nothing; and there is nothing in the rights log regarding an extension or something so I have removed the rights and will leave a message about this to Devunt@kowikinews. -- MarcoAurelio (talk) 10:14, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Hanberke@tk.wikipedia

I've been an admin on this wiki for more than two years. Please grant me 1 year temporary sysop status. I'm only sysop there. Thanks in advance. Hanberke 07:23, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Done. To expire on 24 August 2012. -- Daniel Mayer (mav) 00:48, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

removed. Matanya (talk) 06:50, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Thuvack@ts.wikipedia

Thank you! --Thuvack (talk) 09:38, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

On hold until 24.02.2012. Ruslik (talk) 10:51, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2012-08-24. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks.Bencmq (talk) 05:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

removed. Matanya (talk) 06:50, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

JVRKPRASAD@te.wiktionary

As there is no active Bureaucrat for Telugu Wiktionary, I as Telugu Wikipedia Bureaucrat am placing the request here. I realize that two votes are cast beyond the deadline due to misunderstanding of the deadline, but as there is no one opposing the request the Stewards to consider the same as valid. Arjunaraoc 04:18, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

 Granted for 6 months to expire on 2012-08-02. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. Bencmq 05:08, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks on behalf of Telugu Wiktionary Contributors. --Arjunaraoc 14:16, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Expiration notification sent. --Bencmq (talk) 01:43, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

removed. Matanya (talk) 09:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

As per the expire notification received from Bencmq, I have placed my extension request immediately [10]for the comments from the members. But, so far only one administrator has given appropriate support without any guidelines for future term. Further, it is to bring to your kind notice that my temporary admin-ship has been cancelled abruptly without any further reminder from your end. please send sufficient information by in-time to the lower cadre batch admins by higher archy. You have to notice and observe that how many members are visiting te.wiktionary daily, what are their activities, submission of sufficient qualitative as well as quantitative information etc. The higher archy have to also recognize the blossom buds wiktionaries like te.wiktionary, etc. Your co-operation must be required. I am also bring to your notice that some more discussions have been continuing about the te.wiktionary by some of my colleague members to bring the same to limelight as well as useful for all people. In the mean time it is to advise that the extension period for my admin-ship may be granted for further more months without any ambiguity or otherwise sanction the admin post as on permanent basis. As the te.wiktionary have not obtaining or daily visiting by sufficient active members for which election for the permanent post with the norms as advised by you is not possible at present. Hence one more permanent admin post should be sanctioned to any person by you immediately. JVRKPRASAD (talk) 16:33, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

suitable reply or action has not been taken till today by the higher archy. kindly do needful favourable action in this regard early. JVRKPRASAD (talk) 07:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Obelix@da.wikibooks

 Granted for 1 year to expire on 2012-12-11. Done. At this time I've granted fixed-term adminship for one year (expiring 11 December 2012), because I don't think the participation in your RfA justifies permanent adminship. However, if community activity increases over that period, please feel free to open a new request for permanent adminship on dawikibooks. Good luck, PeterSymonds (talk) 20:16, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

I spoke earlier with Laaknor, and he told me two or more votes are needed for permanent administrator status. Isn't that right? It's difficult to find persons to vote at such small and inactive wikis and more than two people is going to be very difficult.Obelix 20:51, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

I have never said two or more votes. It is always done on case-by-case. Laaknor 22:44, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry. I must have misunderstood our previous discussion then.Obelix 22:56, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

removed earlier per own request, see Special:PermaLink/3988630#Obelix@dawikibooks. Trijnstel_talk 20:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Danny B.@wm2013

Since I do technical maintenance here, I'd like to request import rights so I could import necessary stuff from other wikis. Thank you.

— Danny B. 13:03, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

-- Done Thank you for your efforts in WM2012! --Jyothis (talk) 13:13, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Jmajeremy@Commons

I would like to have the transwiki importer permission at least temporarily so I can import templates related to w:WP:Files for upload. And I'm not sure if this is relevant to transwiki importing, but I'll need to use the "include templates" option. Jmajeremy (talk) 03:37, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I believe a local announcement/request is needed here. --Bencmq (talk) 16:09, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I'll post a link to the discussion here once there's a positive consensus. If consensus is negative, I'll simply delete this request. Jmajeremy (talk) 19:52, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Not done. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:30, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

TariButtar@pa.wikipedia

Hi, I need the full access to pa.wiki. Please grant me the permissions. There are only few persons with special permissions so I request for all the permissions in good faith. I'm quite familiar with wikis policies etc. And want to improve the pa.wiki in every way. Requesting for all but it's on you which to grant? With thanks. TariButtar (talk) 10:38, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

• FYI of the Stewards - there are six administrators on pa.wikipedia. A discussion has been started here regarding this request QU ^TalkQu 11:42, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi TariButtar, we can't grant you all permissions straight away and it's not for us to decide what permissions to grant you. Instead, you should tell us what tools you actually need and make a local request. Thanks. Bencmq (talk) 16:12, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

thanks all, I acknowledge. One of the six admins of pa.wiki, Sukh, made his last edit on October 31, 2007 what to with him/her? And what do you mean by request locally? please guide and as you asked I need category access (renaming, deleting etc.) and wanna an importer's right too (to import from pa.wiki to pa.wiktionary). And by few persons with special permissions/rights I meant on pa.wiktionary; there may no actually. TariButtar (talk) 16:09, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Requests for adminship need to be specific to a wiki, after having been proposed and discussed at that wiki, and lodged above at Steward requests/Permissions#Administrator access. At this point of time, there is nothing here to be done. — billinghurst sDrewth 08:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Danny B.@skwiki

Since I do technical maintenance here, I'd like to request import rights so I could import necessary stuff from other wikis. Thank you.

— Danny B. 22:12, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Done —DerHexer (Talk) 22:15, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

E THP@gagwiki

hi.gagWiki is not bureaucrat.I need to access.

1. .Donation bot flag.
2. .checkuser Require.
3. .Management to become permanent.
4. ...

Thank you.E THP (talk) 18:34, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi E THP.

1. The bot owner has to request the bot flag himself on Steward requests/Bot status IIRC.
2. Do you want to *have* CU rights, or do want a CU to be *performed*? We can't do the first, but the second one should be requested on Steward requests/Checkuser.
3. For that you have to start a local discussion, for example in the local village pump - for now it'll be expire in September.

Kind regards, Trijnstel_talk 19:16, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi.Not active user on the Wiki(gag).I have my request.E THP (talk) 08:16, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

This has been almost a month, but I don't really understand the request here. Could someone explain this or if E THP could clarify it? So we can get it processed. Bencmq (talk) 16:13, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

If possible.Give permanent management Or Can renew.Allow access to the robot.Thank you.E THP (talk) 18:48, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

What do you mean by "permanent management"? Administrator/Sysop rights? Access to robots? Do you mean that you want to give the bot flag to accounts? -Barras talk 19:07, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes to the flag،and Renewal of temporary management.E THP (talk) 08:05, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

---

Comment See User talk:Trijnstel#Bureaucratic. It looks like he wants all available rights or so... Trijnstel_talk 13:19, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Looks like this user doesn't know English well. I sent this user a request in Russian, in the hope that he will understand it better on his home Wikipedia talk page. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 11:32, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm asking to be bureaucratic،for Better active in the wiki،I request wiki{gag).--E THP (talk) 08:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

I will talk to him,we share same languageMardetanha ^talk 14:18, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Not done Per disccusion with user, I mark this request as not done Mardetanha ^talk 20:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)