Jump to content

Steward requests/Permissions/2015-12

From Meta, a Wikimedia project coordination wiki

Administrator access

David1010@ka.wikibooks

I would like to renew my sysop rights on Georgian Wikibooks. David1010 (talk) 08:18, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi David1010, please post a local request. And provide us with a link. After a week we can check if there is enough support, or at least no real objections. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 11:58, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
@David1010: ? .--Grind24 (talk) 04:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
I posted reminders on ka.wikibooks and ka wikipedia, his most active project, several days ago. He has been active there since my message. Posted a reminder today. Taketa (talk) 07:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Not done - No local discussion. No response for 7 days. Please file a new request. - Taketa (talk) 08:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

AzChanna@Sd.Wikipedia

I am already admin on sd wiki and i want to adminship for life:-- AzChanna (talk) 14:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Is actually a consensus in this discussion? Only three !votes? Ruslik (talk) 20:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
Where is the request? The link given above was last edited 2 months ago. --Stryn (talk) 15:10, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, AzChanna, the discussion you posted was for the first election (Steward_requests/Permissions/Approved_temporary#AzChanna.40sdwiki) which expired on 14 Nov 2015. Usually, after the temporary adminship expires, you start another discussion for a permanent adminship [there is no "adminship for life" ;)].
Vote wise, considering this is a small wiki with 4,000-ish content, and 30-something active users, 3 votes are not that unusual for wiki of that size. Bennylin 13:39, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
If the community hasn't grown, it is more likely we will extend your temporary adminship. Savhñ 14:06, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
@AzChanna, please file a new request to extend your temporary adminship. Savhñ 14:53, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
@AzChanna, please file a new local request to have your temporary adminship extended. Apologies for the confusion caused by the previous message. Savhñ 01:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Not done as there is no answer. Ruslik (talk) 06:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Bivek bhattarai@en.wikipedia

(I Request you to grant me permission for two month.Thank you.) Bivek bhattarai (talk) 09:55, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Not done @Bivek bhattarai: Please address your request to English Wikipedia. Also your recent request was declined too. --Grind24 (talk) 10:20, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

唐吉訶德的侍從@cdo.wikipedia

I request you to grant me sysop right. Thx. el caballero de los Leones (talk) 10:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Your bureaucrat GnuDoyng was active 2 weeks ago. Please ask him to appoint you admin. We only act if he does not respond. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 12:09, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
@Taketa: Okay, i have sent him an e-mail to notice him. But, his life seems very busy because he had no contributions from 11 August 2013 to 16 November 2015 [2]. If he didn't reply me, when can i request here next time?--el caballero de los Leones (talk) 14:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
I have also posted a note on his talk page. Let's give it a week, that should be enough time to respond. All the best, Taketa (talk) 18:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Done - Taketa (talk) 09:24, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Рахман3@kaawiki

I ask to give me admin rights. --188.113.200.220 19:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Not done, I don't know who you are (as edited not logged in), but Рахман3's admin rights was removed on May 2015, and there haven't been a new local discussion after that. And Рахман3 has not edited at all after May. --Stryn (talk) 11:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

NehalDaveND@sa.wikipedia

Total voting is 13, in which 12 are in support and 1 is neutral. Only one inactive bureaucrat is there. I have put that request on 13/12/2015 and after 1 week (20/12/2015) I am putting this here. NehalDaveND (talk) 17:28, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Dear NehalDaveND, your bureaucrat MikeLynch was active in the last week on en.wiki. I have contacted him on en.wiki and via email. If he does not respond in a week, please let us know. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 08:07, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Dear Taketa, Thank you. I also wrote a mail to him. Two months ago I mailed him and he told me that I am not active in this project. And you are taking about some edit by him. So he may work in some other wikipedia and via interwikilink he done a edit here. I know you are following process. He wrote in his user page https://sa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A6%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%83:MikeLynch (I am inactive on this project, but I will still perform Bureaucrat actions when needed. If you need emergency administrator or bureaucrat assistance). I mailed him three times before also (for other reason). But he is inactive. Its okay if we will have to wait for his response. I am telling this for clarification. I have wait 7 days from 13/12/2015 after your opinion I will have to wait more 7 days. Means 14 or 15 days. Please guide me if some other way is there. There are so many administrative work in sa.wikipeida. NehalDaveND (talk) 08:25, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
I understand the delay is not nice. However since there is no emergency, and there are other admins active, I really think we should wait for the local bureaucrat. He says he will do bureaucrat actions and we have to give him a chance. You may want to consider either appointing more bureaucrats or not having any bureaucrats, to prevent this situation in the future. For the moment  On hold until 27 Dec. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 08:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Its okay. I am understanding your point very well. I have no problem. I will wait till 27/12/2015. Thank you for kind guidance. NehalDaveND (talk) 08:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Consensus has been taken place from last one week and corresponding bureaucrat is not responding there. So, I think decision should be taken place.☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 09:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Done by local bureaucrat. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 18:19, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Aabdullayev851@az.wiktionary

Hi, Look here please Sinan (talk) 09:49, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. There is discussion page on az.wiktionary.org. vote time for 1 week and it finished 18 december 2015. There are 9 support and 1 opposite vote for my local admin request. Please give a decision about it. Aabdullayev851 (talk) 07:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

DoneMarcoAurelio 08:51, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Accipiter Q. Gentilis@ro.wikipedia

We have no bureaucrats at Romanian Wikipedia. The candidate acquired 25 votes for, nobody opposed or abstained. The discussion time for sysop candidates is 7 days. Firilacroco talk 11:08, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

DoneMarcoAurelio 12:46, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Teslaton@skwiki

Please promote user Teslaton to administrator. Thanks.--ILoveJuice (talk) 13:54, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Not done Please ask to a local bureaucrat. This project has an active bureaucrat --Melos (talk) 14:02, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Bureaucrat access

Dsvyas@gu.wikipedia.org

He is nominated as Bureaucrat on gu.wikipedia.org. YmKavishwar (talk) 03:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

I am not sure that the size of the active community is sufficient to form a consensus to promote a bureaucrat. Ruslik (talk) 09:25, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
A request please allow this. Our community is way to growth. If you granted this user right our community is speeding up. This user is very suitable person to this user right also. Thanks.-YmKavishwar (talk) 09:52, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Not done 5 participants in a bureaucrat request is too low by all standards that stewards use. --MF-W 22:04, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

User Coren@wikimania2017

Original bureaucrat for the event wiki. — Coren (talk) / (en-wiki) 16:35, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Done -Barras talk 16:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

CheckUser access

Beeblebrox@enwiki

Since I have the ArbCom noticeboard watchlisted, I just noticed that the enwiki Arbitration Committee voted to restore the checkuser tools to this editor (a former ArbCom member) over an hour ago, but it seems that they forgot to request its actual implementation here. The motion is linked above in the "Discussion" bullet point. Thanks, Biblioworm 23:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Not done at this point, please address your concerns to English Wikipedia ArbCom.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:44, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. I'm not especially familiar with all the proper processes concerning meta-wiki matters. --Biblioworm 23:51, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Please flip the switch, on behalf of ENWP's ArbCom. --Guerillero 01:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Done. Ajraddatz (talk) 01:52, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Ash Crow@frwikipedia

Per French arbcom decision here. Thanks, — Racconish ☎ 17:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

User is not yet listed on noticeboard, so on hold. einsbor talk 17:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I am on the list with my other account (User:Sylvain WMFr). Do I have to register twice? I signed the confidentiality agreement with this account too. -Ash Crow (talk) 19:05, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Hi @Ash Crow:, please also sign the agreement with your volunteer account. -Barras talk 20:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Done. -Ash Crow (talk) 21:14, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Done -Barras talk 22:23, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Linedwell@frwikipedia

Per French arbcom decision here. Thanks, — Racconish ☎ 17:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

granted, einsbor talk 17:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Hexasoft@frwikipedia

Per French arbcom decision here. Thanks, — Racconish ☎ 17:31, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

granted, Trijnstel, Barras, could you please do irc/mailing stuff? einsbor talk 17:44, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Doing... -Barras talk 18:39, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Done -Barras talk 20:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Casliber@en.wikipedia

For the Arbitration Committee, Guerillero 19:42, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 20:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Drmies@en.wikipedia

For the Arbitration Committee, Guerillero 19:42, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 20:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Gamaliel@en.wikipedia

For the Arbitration Committee, Guerillero 19:42, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 20:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Kelapstick@en.wikipedia

For the Arbitration Committee, Guerillero 19:42, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 20:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Opabinia regalis@en.wikipedia

For the Arbitration Committee, Guerillero 19:42, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 20:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

DoRD@en.wikipedia

Please regrant Checkuser to DoRD, per Arbcom motion. For the Arbitration Committee, Courcelles 01:51, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Done. Ruy Pugliesi 01:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Oversight access

MarcoAurelio@meta

Per successful vote, please grant MA local oversight rights. -Barras talk 22:26, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Done, einsbor talk 22:32, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Casliber@en.wikipedia

For the Arbitration Committee, Guerillero 19:45, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 20:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Drmies@en.wikipedia

For the Arbitration Committee, Guerillero 19:45, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 20:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Gamaliel@en.wikipedia

For the Arbitration Committee, Guerillero 19:45, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 20:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Kirill Lokshin@en.wikipedia

For the Arbitration Committee, Guerillero 19:45, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 20:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Opabinia regalis@en.wikipedia

For the Arbitration Committee, Guerillero 19:45, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 20:22, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

DoRD@en.wikipedia

Please re-grant Oversight to DoRD, per Arbcom motion. For the Arbitration Committee, Courcelles 01:51, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Done. Ruy Pugliesi 01:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Removal of access

Sbisolo@it.wikipedia

Sbisolo has been already informed and thanked for his work. Thanks. Harlock81 (talk) 23:35, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

But the user is active? Ruslik (talk) 09:32, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I'm still active as user. In last months I used only revert function as administrator. --Sbisolo (talk) 13:50, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
This situation has produced a discussion among users and admin of it.wiki, which is still ongoing. I withdraw the request, awaiting its conclusion. Thanks. --Harlock81 (talk) 12:22, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Though the issue started with @Ruslik0:'s mistake taking into consideration edits instead of logs. --Vituzzu (talk) 13:57, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Mintho@pl.wikipedia

Due to our policy, I hereby request removal of administrator access due to lack of edits made in the main namespace during a 1 year period. The user has been notified (https://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dyskusja_wikipedysty:Mintho&diff=44089549&oldid=41248616). PG (talk) 09:49, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 11:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

MAGISTER@de.wikipedia

thanks, → «« Man77 »» [de] 23:44, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Done, einsbor talk 07:23, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Jalo@it.wikipedia

I wish to give up my admin flag on it.wikipedia. I have no more time, and it is 6 months that I don't perform any admin action. I hope I'll return someday, but job and child will occupy me still for a long time :D See you soon or, at least, as soon as possible Jalo 22:23, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

on hold for 24 h per standard practice. einsbor talk 22:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Done - Taketa (talk) 22:24, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

User Kb@pl.wikipedia

I hereby request removal of my sysop permission on Polish Wikipedia. kb (talk) 21:32, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

 On hold for 24 h per standard practice. Linedwell (talk) 22:12, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
No need to put it on hold, as it was also requested by community on Kawiarenka/Wikipedyści, so anyone from pl.wikipedi may ask to do it now. Thanks in advance for quick removal. kb (talk) 09:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Done. @Kb: thanks for your service. Linedwell (talk) 10:16, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

User Sbisolo@it.wikipedia

Please remove admin grant because there's a policy about 6 months of inactivity. Last my two administrator activities were done after these 6 months of inactivity. Sbisolo (talk) 16:24, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Done, thanks for your service. --Stryn (talk) 10:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Deskana@en.wikipedia

Doug Weller (talk) 11:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 14:09, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Ronhjones@en.wikipedia

Doug Weller (talk) 11:31, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 14:09, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

AS@ukwikipedia

Please remove my sysop rights. AS (talk) 11:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

on hold for 24 h per standard practice. Taketa (talk) 14:10, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Done, einsbor talk 14:34, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Charlotte1125@zh.wikipedia

He has been inactive for 6 months, and did not return in 1 month after notification. Per our local policy, his sysop flag should be removed.--Kegns 13:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Please thank them for all their work as admin. - Taketa (talk) 18:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

RalfX@zh.wikipedia

Ditto.--Kegns 13:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Please thank them for all their work as admin. - Taketa (talk) 18:49, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

RajeshPandey@ne.wikipedia

As per above, and also inactivity of Rajeshpandey. I had made a local discussion for request of removal of bureaucrat flag at newikipedia, & got no argues while it being open for more than a month. So that requested here on meta. -- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 06:23, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

--Jyothis (talk) 02:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks alot!! Jyothis :) :) -- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 05:54, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Jusjih as steward

I am resigning as a steward, effective 2015-12-12T12:12:12Z. I will better concentrate on being an administrator here on Meta and 11 other wikis.Jusjih (talk) 01:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Done Thanks for all you have done. A distinguished "career" and enjoy a little more time to do editing and hopefully some RL.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:51, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: I fear this has been done two days early ("effective 2015-12-12T12:12:12Z") and apparently you forgot to remove Jusjih from the global steward group, too. ;-) --Vogone (talk) 15:39, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
You are right. I missed the nuance, I will chat with him. So many mods are required for adding and removing.  — billinghurst sDrewth 22:09, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Ochilov@global

I have got this right when I have the problems with my Internt operator with access to some Wikimedia projects and pages due to censorhsip, now they fixed it so I do not need to use VPN/proxy. So, I request the removal of:

  • Global IP block exemptions
  • ipblock-exempt on wikimania2016 - fixed myself
  • ipblock-exempt on ruwikiquote

I am not a flag collector so I am immediately taking off flags if I do not have a real need of them. Thanks --Ochilov (talk) 09:46, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

I removed the global flag, but, please, address all local requests to the local administrators. Ruslik (talk) 11:53, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Ruslik0, the problem is that all admins in Russian Wikiquote reply after two-three months. But thank you for removing the global one, I think I will just email one if the ruwikiquote admins :) --Ochilov (talk) 12:23, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
Я так не думаю, надо просто найти активных админов, а они есть...--6AND5 (talk) 19:44, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

User names@ne.wikipedia

S.N. Sysops Usernames Contributions
1. Indiver Contribs
2. Eukesh Contribs
3. Laxmi Rose Contribs
4. RajeshPandey Contribs
5. सृजना Contribs
6. Nepaboy Contribs

According to newikipedia local policy, I had made a local discussion for request of removal of sysops flags at newikipedia, & got no argues while it being open for more than a month. There are 3 bureaucrats but no response at all while i've already left messages on their talk page. So, We would like to request here on meta for removal of sysops rights. -- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 06:11, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

What are conditions for the removal in this new policy? Ruslik (talk) 11:19, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: Hi, According to the policy, main condition is that sysops should give atleast 100 contrib. as well with administrative task for example: delete, restore, import, granting user right etc. within time period of 6 months. IMO, They haven't done any such kinds of activities and they are inactive too. They also haven't given atleast 150 contributions within 6 months. For more info about sysops removal policies, you can visit here. -- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 07:32, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Can anyone please help here?? -- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 06:22, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 11:15, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks alot Ruslik ..:) :) -- Tulsi Bhagat (Talk) 12:59, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

AGK@en.wikipedia.org

Hi! Please remove the checkuser and oversight rights from my Enwiki account. I was granted oversight only by virtue of my ArbCom seat, which I'm now vacating. And I also wish to relinquish my community-appointed checkuser permissions for the time being. Many thanks, AGK [•] 17:45, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Done (done before the 24 hours procedure as IIRC we don't wait when advanced permissions are involved)MarcoAurelio 17:53, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Yann@gu.wikipedia.org

No any admin activity in this year.--Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 15:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Is there any inactivity policy or vote for this? —MarcoAurelio 21:06, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
@YmKavishwar, please provide a policy link and an explanation for this request. —MarcoAurelio 17:29, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Not done, no reply from requester for 3 days. —MarcoAurelio 00:16, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Spangineer@en.wikisource

Spangineer has resigned as local Checkuser. Please remove Checkuser bit but do not remove Sysop bit.

This leaves our local community with only one Checkuser, namely Billinghurst. I understand that Billinghurst may not act as local Checkuser so long as he is the only one we have. Speaking for myself, there is no need to remove Billinghurst's local Checkuser bit. We'll have a discussion about a new Checkuser without delay, and Billinghurst can be trusted not to make use of the tools in the interim.

Hesperian 08:58, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Done. Billinghurst's rights were removed/suspended as well; there cannot be an exception from the minimum of 2. --MF-W 16:17, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
Just a question of curiosity: As a general rule, in a case like this, once the wiki has appointed a new Checkuser, does the flag of the existing partner checkuser (Billinghurst, in this case) get restored automatically? Or does that have to go through another discussion? Or is that individual wiki policy? StevenJ81 (talk) 16:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Yes, it gets restored. --MF-W 16:09, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Usually yes, but in this case it won't, since Billinghurst resigned as well (see below) and he didn't sign the new confidentiality agreement... Trijnsteltalk 17:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
I understand that. I was wondering what the general process was. StevenJ81 (talk) 17:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Billinghurst global rights

Please remove my steward, and meta oversight and checkuser roles; and return my global rollbacker. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 11:04, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

I request to set this removal on hold until this situation is clarified.--Syum90 (talk) 12:15, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
On hold for 24 h per standard practice. Taketa (talk) 12:52, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
@Taketa: I think this is not a "standard" situation, in my opinion it is not regular that an user as billi resign all his advanced permissions suddenly and without any explanation, so I kindly request you to wait several days before removing, in order to have time to completely clarify this case.--Syum90 (talk) 14:26, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
We can wait for a reply by Billinghurst. On hold for at least 24 hours. If after that there is no clarity we can wait longer. Taketa (talk) 14:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
@Taketa: thank you very much :-) Syum90 (talk) 14:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Definitely longer! --Vituzzu (talk) 14:58, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Not that I’m anyone to talk, but I don’t think that anyone should have to explain him/herself if he/she wants to get rid of his/her advanced rights (unless he/she chooses to do so). Being active in various roles demands time, and we have limited amount of that commodity. Situations in our personal lifes can change our priorities, for example. –Ejs-80 16:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Anyone holding rights requiring that they sign the new Confidentiality Agreement has until 15 December to do so (or 31 December for OTRS). Their name will appear on the noticeboard when they have done so. At this time, billinghurst's name does not appear on the noticeboard and his rights will likely be removed by or on direction of the WMF tomorrow. We are unlikely to have "several days" to consider removing them (or not) unless he signs. QuiteUnusual (talk) 16:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Yes, this seems to be the reason for resign; at this point I think it's better to remove the rights in order to set the reason of removal as "resigned".--Syum90 (talk) 08:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Done - Thank you for your long service and great work. - Taketa (talk) 12:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks indeed for your contributions as a steward. @Taketa: Please remove from the local steward group as well. --Glaisher (talk) 12:12, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Done, thank you. - Taketa (talk) 12:20, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Goldfinger@sr.wiki

Please remove his sysop rights per the local inactivity policy, more than a year without syops action. --Milicevic01 (talk) 13:38, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Done, einsbor talk 14:12, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Matthias Klostermayr@barwiki

--Holder (talk) 06:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Done. Best regards, —MarcoAurelio 06:57, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Redf0x@dewiki

According to local policy admin rights are withdrawn after one year of inactivity. He was informed three months ago. NNW (talk) 09:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - 1 year inactive, 90 days after notification, as per local policy - Taketa (talk) 09:34, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

AdiJapan@ro.wikipedia

We have five established users who agree that AdiJapan has an inappropriate behaviour for his sysop and bureaucrat statuses. According to our local community policy, ro:Wikipedia:Revocare#Destituire, in these circumstances, his rights have to be removed temporary and he has to go through the election process in order to get back these rights. Thanks, --Silenzio76 (talk) 17:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 19:01, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Ofekalef@hewiki

Thanks, Ofekalef (talk) 18:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. --Stryn (talk) 18:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Done Stryn (talk) 21:49, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Andrei Stroe@rowiki

Please remove my bureaucrat rights. I am the only bureaucrat left, and now there is no possibility of oversight. Also, use of the bureaucrat rights is very low on ro.wp. Recently, the other bureaucrat was sacked for not using his permissions. The same applies to me. I am far more confortable asking stewards to perform these rare duties.Andrei Stroe (talk) 08:32, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - only bureaucrat on project, self request. No reason to hold. Thank you for your work as bureaucrat. - Taketa (talk) 08:44, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Elph@arwiki

Please remove my admin & bureaucrat rights. Thanks--Abbas 21:42, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

 On hold for 1 day, standard for resignation of advanced permissions. Stryn (talk) 21:47, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Could you, please, put this request on hold for 2 or 3 more days (under my own responsibility) while I talk with Abbas? There is a situation currently going on on Arabic Wikipedia and I want to make sure that this is not a hasty decision by Abbas. Thank you. --Meno25 (talk) 17:46, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Of course.  On hold until you give us an okay. :) Trijnsteltalk 18:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Surely that this is not a hasty decision and all people know everything but because of my friend's request please cancel this removal request. We will solve the problem there. Thanks--Abbas 17:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Original request marked as Not done then. Good luck! --Stryn (talk) 17:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

ⲁϩⲙⲉⲧ@incubatorwiki

I accidentally gave him full instead of test-adminship. Please remove it. --MF-W 13:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

removed, einsbor talk 14:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Aratal@frwikipedia

Per French arbcom decision here: Aratal had not applied for renewal. Thanks, — Racconish ☎ 17:37, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

CU access has been removed, Trijnstel, Barras, as usual, could you please do the rest? einsbor talk 17:47, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Done -Barras talk 18:37, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Strainu@rowiki

Please remove my Checkuser access. Also please take into account that from the 2 remaining checkusers, one has not signed the new agreement and has declared publicly that he will not sign. Strainu (talk) 09:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

In fact, you can remove my and AdiJapan's checkuser rights, too on ro.wp. Even though, technically, AdiJapan will still be checkuser for a while, in reality he is not active at all and thus the condition of mutual control and confirmation is not met.Andrei Stroe (talk) 09:17, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Should we count this as a resignation of you or would you want to take up CU rights again if another CU is elected? --MF-W 14:17, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
@Strainu: I will remove your CU rights per this request.
@Andrei Stroe: Please fill a request at the bottom of this page if you wish to resign your CU access, the same should be done by @AdiJapan: if he wishes to do so.
Best regards, —MarcoAurelio 18:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Done - @Barras, Trijnstel, and Risker:: would you do the rest wrt other accesses? Thanks. —MarcoAurelio 18:14, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Has all been taken care of. -Barras talk 00:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Mywood@zhwiki

She's been inactive for 6 months, and did not come back in 1 month after notification. Per our local policy, both of her A & B flag should be removed. --Kegns 15:44, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 14:18, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Andrei Stroe@rowiki

As asked in Strainu's request, I also request removal of my checkuser rights. AdiJapan will probably not open a request, but otherwise he will remain the only checkuser, so his rights should AFAIK be also removed. Andrei Stroe (talk) 08:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Thanks for your work. I have not waited 24 hours as usual in self-requests because the user requested above the removal, was asked to formalize it, and he's done so; as such the waiting period to avoid the so called "ragequits" is useless here IMHO. AdiJapan's CU rights will be suspended until the appointment of at least a second CU, in any case, subject to the signature of the confidentiality agreement. —MarcoAurelio 14:47, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

AdiJapan@rowiki

This is to note that I have removed ro:User:AdiJapan's CU rights over ro.wikipedia, as the only remaining CheckUser in the project, following the resignation of Strainu diff and Andrei Stroe diff. Rights are suspended pending the appointment of a second CheckUser and the signature of the confidentiality agreement (notification). —MarcoAurelio 15:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Jirka O.@cswiki

Inactive for more than six months (per cs:Wikipedie:Žádost o práva správce#Odebrání práv v případě dlouhodobé neaktivity). Please remove his bureaucrat rights. Thank you. 83.143.240.4 17:54, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Taketa (talk) 19:12, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Str4nd@fiwikisource

The Finnish Wikisource have approved a brand new policy on the removal of sysop rights. Section 3 states "inactivity of two years" meaning zero administrative actions. The last log action of user Str4nd was performed 6 November 2013, and that is over two years ago. The new policy is retroactive, and inactivity can be calculated from the day the policy was adopted (18 Dec 2015). Please remove the rights. The prevous request, which was declined, can be found here. --Pxos (talk) 20:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Can you make an English translation of the policy? Ruslik (talk) 14:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
There are 4 different reasons (sections as Pxos wrote above) to remove an adminship, and you can see the English translations with green text in the end of every section. They are shorter than the original Finnish texts, but pretty much says all that is needed. --Stryn (talk) 17:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
No I won't translate the whole policy, but I'll translate the relevant section three.

Ylläpito-oikeudet poistetaan, mikäli ylläpitäjille rajoitettuja toimintoja ei ole lainkaan käytetty kahteen vuoteen. (inactivity of two years)
The administrative rights will be removed whenever [the user] has not performed any such action as has been restricted only to administrators in two years.

To put it more simply, if the user has not deleted, protected, or imported a page nor has he blocked another user – in two years counting backwards from the day of reckoning, he is deemed inactive. I don't think there is anything odd about this. Several projects have similar policies in place. --Pxos (talk) 19:24, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Done - Policy discussion was sufficient. One month prolonged discussion in village pump, with active editors involved. Taketa (talk) 07:13, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Martin H.@commonswiki

Please remove my checkuser access. --Martin H. (talk) 15:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

 On hold 1 day per standard practice. Linedwell (talk) 15:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Done - Thanks for your work. Taketa (talk) 06:16, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Ariel@it.wikipedia

Ariel has been already informed and thanked for his work. Thanks. Harlock81 (talk) 22:30, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 07:07, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Perohanych@ua.wikimedia

Please remove bureaucrat and admin flags of the user, who was not elected to neither Board nor Audcom of WMUA as per AGM which just ended. Per wmua:Рішення Правління №78 від 23 грудня 2012 only members of the following organs are to hold the flags unless a specific decision is made (which is not the case for the user) --Base (talk) 14:55, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

done, einsbor talk 15:08, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

NickK@ua.wikimedia

Please remove bureaucrat and admin flags of the user, who was not elected to neither Board nor Audcom of WMUA as per AGM which just ended. Per wmua:Рішення Правління №78 від 23 грудня 2012 only members of the following organs are to hold the flags unless a specific decision is made (which is not the case for the user) --Base (talk) 14:55, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

done, einsbor talk 15:08, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Ліонкінг@ua.wikimedia

Please remove bureaucrat and admin flags of the user, who was not elected to neither Board nor Audcom of WMUA as per AGM which just ended. Per wmua:Рішення Правління №78 від 23 грудня 2012 only members of the following organs are to hold the flags unless a specific decision is made (which is not the case for the user) --Base (talk) 14:55, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

done, einsbor talk 15:08, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Amakuha@ua.wikimedia

Please remove bureaucrat and admin flags of the user, who was not elected to neither Board nor Audcom of WMUA as per AGM which just ended. Per wmua:Рішення Правління №78 від 23 грудня 2012 only members of the following organs are to hold the flags unless a specific decision is made (which is not the case for the user) --Base (talk) 14:55, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

done, einsbor talk 15:08, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Bcorr@en.wikipedia

Please remove bureaucrat permission on English Wikipedia; editor has not fulfilled the w:Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements and has been advised of the pending removal. With thanks to the editor for their past service. –xeno 03:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Done. Ruy Pugliesi 05:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Brion VIBBER@en.wikipedia

Please remove bureaucrat permission on English Wikipedia; editor has not fulfilled the w:Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements and has been advised of the pending removal. With thanks to the editor for their past service. –xeno 03:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Done. Ruy Pugliesi 05:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Cimon Avaro@en.wikipedia

Please remove bureaucrat permission on English Wikipedia; editor has not fulfilled the w:Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements and has been advised of the pending removal. With thanks to the editor for their past service. –xeno 03:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Done. Ruy Pugliesi 05:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Ilyanep@en.wikipedia

Please remove bureaucrat permission on English Wikipedia; editor has not fulfilled the w:Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements and has been advised of the pending removal. With thanks to the editor for their past service. –xeno 03:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Done. Ruy Pugliesi 05:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Infrogmation@en.wikipedia

Please remove bureaucrat permission on English Wikipedia; editor has not fulfilled the w:Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements and has been advised of the pending removal. With thanks to the editor for their past service. –xeno 03:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Done. Ruy Pugliesi 05:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Jwrosenzweig@en.wikipedia

Please remove bureaucrat permission on English Wikipedia; editor has not fulfilled the w:Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements and has been advised of the pending removal. With thanks to the editor for their past service. –xeno 03:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Done. Ruy Pugliesi 05:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Raul654@en.wikipedia

Please remove bureaucrat permission on English Wikipedia; editor has not fulfilled the w:Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements and has been advised of the pending removal. With thanks to the editor for their past service. –xeno 03:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Done. Ruy Pugliesi 05:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Secretlondon@en.wikipedia

Please remove bureaucrat permission on English Wikipedia; editor has not fulfilled the w:Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements and has been advised of the pending removal. With thanks to the editor for their past service. –xeno 03:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Done. Ruy Pugliesi 05:27, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Cprompt@en.wikipedia

Please remove bureaucrat permission on English Wikipedia; editor has not fulfilled the w:Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Bureaucrat activity requirements and has been advised of the pending removal. With thanks to the editor for their past service. –xeno 05:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Done. Ruy Pugliesi 05:35, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Temporary permissions (expired and rejected requests only)

Voskanyan@hy.wikiquote

--ԱշոտՏՆՂ (talk) 20:17, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2015-12-01. -- Taketa (talk) 06:05, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
removed. Matanya (talk) 22:19, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

BeGasy@mgwikipedia

In absence of bureaucrats, and on behalf of mg:user:BeGasy, I hereby request the administrator status for BeGasy on the Malagasy Wikipedia. He originally made the request a week ago. Thanks in advance, Jagwar grrr... 09:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

  • Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2015-12-02. Discussion open for suitable length of time without significant opposition To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 13:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
removed. Matanya (talk) 22:19, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Sujay25@bn.wiktionary

I hereby request my temporary adminship for the Bengali Wiktionary to be continued. Last 4 months of my admin-ship I have developed some templates, added some gadgets and tools. Also I was doing the maintenance work regularly. Thank you.-Sujay25 (talk) 06:02, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

{{inprogress}} Through June 5, 2015. -- Avi (talk) 14:04, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2015-12-05. Ajraddatz (talk) 02:29, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
removed --Stryn (talk) 13:07, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

MIKHEIL@kawikiquote

Hello. Please grant @User:MIKHEIL with adminship again. He remains the most active user on the Georgian Wikiquote; there were two discussions ([9], [10]) for his adminship in 2012 and 2013. –BruTe talk 16:41, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

I'm afraid there needs to be a new one. --MF-W 20:34, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Please keep it 'On hold'. We've started a new one. –BruTe talk 13:29, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Discussion.  On hold till 7 Dec--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 09:37, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2015-12-07.  — billinghurst sDrewth 02:44, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

RemovedMarcoAurelio 14:58, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Uchup19@su.wikiquote

Please, prolong sysop status in Sundanese Wikiquote--Uchup19 (talk) 05:37, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Please wait a few days to allow for any feedback. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 06:08, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
{{Inprogress}} Discussion in progress until at least June 8, 2015. -- Avi (talk) 14:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2015-12-08. Discussion open for sufficient length of time without significant opposition. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 15:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
RemovedMarcoAurelio 14:59, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

AryanSogd@tg.wikipedia

Please assign a flag adminship. Thank you AryanSogd 12:30, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

{{onhold}} till 8 June 2015. Ruslik (talk) 19:42, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2015-12-08. Discussion open for sufficient length of time with no significant opposition. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 16:00, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Granted for 6 months??? Thank you for your confidence in the interim, but, temporary administrator I was and every time to pass this humiliating process, I do not intend to. So take away the flag itself, learn the Tajik language and are engaged in administrative matters. I'm not a slave and I do not need charity. Thanks.

Скажу на русском языке для тех, кто не понял мой английский: Благодарю за временное доверие, но, временным администратором, я уже был и каждый раз проходить подобную унизительную процедуру, я не намерен. Так что заберите флаг себе, изучите таджикский язык и сами решайте административные вопросы. Я вам не раб и в благотворительности не нуждаюсь. Спасибо,--AryanSogd 14:17, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

{{on hold}} AryanSogd, this is a process that exists to allow for communities to appoint their administrators, especially where there is only one or two administrator, who often do not continue in the role. In lieu of activity requirements or internal processes, these communities have temporary appointments. So this is a process and if you have been through it more than once, it will extend up to usually a year in length. A year is about the longest that we will give a temporary adminship as that equates with the annual confirmation processes of some of the large wikis. Stewards themselves go through an annual review by the community, so it is not about humiliation, it is about activity and community.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:42, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

@Avi, excuse me, for harsh words. I had to file this application because, only-begotten the administrator for whom the Tajik language was the mother, more than a month does not appear in the draft (probably offended that has not received the status of a bureaucrat). The Administrators come and go and the issue of vandalism is always relevant. According to our rules, we reserve the right apply directly to metawiki without discussion at the local project, because if you do not invite a vote the declaration may lie unnoticed for years. Once again, I apologize to you and I hope your understanding. @billinghurst, thank you for your understanding and support. Sincerely--AryanSogd 14:42, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

@AryanSogd:, no worries and no offense taken; everybody gets frustrated at times. Do you still want to relinquish your rights for now? -- Avi (talk) 18:30, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Let it be. I hope the administrator will return for this time. Thank you very much! Sincerely--AryanSogd 01:33, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
OK. When your privs expire in six months, the next upgrade is for a year anyway. -- Avi (talk) 01:53, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
And it should just require a note to your community in the same place a week or two prior to the expiry expressing a wish to continue. Really glad that you are continuing with the role, we need passionate volunteers.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:58, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
RemovedMarcoAurelio 14:59, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

555@ptwikisource

I would like to renew my sysop term on pt.Wikisource. Please let me know if I need to do more than this request. Best, Lugusto 22:32, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

You need to inform the ptWS community of your desire to continue ... at s:pt:Wikisource:Esplanada/Voltar a ter flag sysop?  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:19, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Done. The previous thread is currently archived. Lugusto 19:34, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
On hold until 10 December. --MF-W 14:55, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2015-12-10. --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 17:13, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
removed. Matanya (talk) 22:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

David1010@kawikibooks

Please renew David1010's adminship term. –BruTe talk 06:10, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2015-12-10. --Shanmugamp7 (talk) 08:29, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
removed. Matanya (talk) 22:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Alex Nico@roa-rup.wikipedia

I hereby request my temporary adminship for the Aromanian Wikipedia to be continued. The first discussion, after which I was granted for 3 months, can be seen here. While being an admin, I've helped to further develop the interface (there were translations missing) and I was also able to correct some errors. Moreover, it seems that lately there were some negative contributions that needed to be undone. Thank you! Alex Nico (talk) 18:22, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Please make a local announcement first at roa-rup.wikipedia. --Stryn (talk) 19:47, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Marking as Not done as no answer nor announcement made. --Stryn (talk) 12:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
I have made the local announcement here. Thank you! --Alex Nico (talk) 18:02, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
 On hold till 11 June. --Stryn (talk) 18:07, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2015-12-11. Discussion open for sufficient length of time without significant opposition. Increasing term from 3 to 6 months. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 19:48, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! --Alex Nico (talk) 20:00, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Removed --Stryn (talk) 12:54, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Joxemai@eu.wikibooks

Deletion rights are needed for the project maintenance. I request rights for one year. Thanks.- Joxemai (talk) 12:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

That discussion is from December 2014. Please open a new one and link it here. Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 13:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
@Joxemai: Kaixo. ¿Podrías abrir un hilo en el café o página que uséis para solicitar permisos indicando que deseas solicitar/prorrogar tu acceso administrativo? Un saludo. —MarcoAurelio 14:59, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
Note: the user opened the RfA. Setting as  On hold until 12 June 2015 to allow community input if any. —MarcoAurelio 18:16, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2015-12-12. @Joxemai:MarcoAurelio 16:26, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
removed. Matanya (talk) 17:38, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Joxemai@eu.wiktionary

The project needs regular maintenance. - Joxemai (talk) 15:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

 On hold until 14th December--Shanmugamp7 (talk) 07:17, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
Done Granted for 1 year to expire on 2015-12-14. Ajraddatz (talk) 03:29, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
removed. Taketa (talk) 07:01, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

gitartha.bordoloi@as.wikisource

On hold until 23 September (1 week minimum for the request). --MF-W 13:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2015-12-24. Without any local votes, I think that 3 months of access is a good place to start at. Thanks for volunteering, and feel free to ask on meta if you need help (or on IRC). Ajraddatz (talk) 07:13, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
ExtendedMarcoAurelio 07:23, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Ebrahim@ur.wikipedia.org

As per discussion linked above, Plz grant interface editor rights to user:Ebrahim, Thanks. Muhammad Shuaib (talk) 05:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

I can not assign this user to the requested usergroup because such a usergroup does not exist on urwiki. Ruslik (talk) 10:29, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Best practice here would to grant him temporary sysop flag and he could solve your issues Mardetanha talk 14:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

KartikMistry@gu.wikipedia.org

He is nominated as Rollbacker and importer (આયાતક) on guwiki. Local sysop cann't access to grant user right--YmKavishwar (talk) 16:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

There is no rollbacker right at guwiki. Please, explain why you need the import right. Ruslik (talk) 02:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
We want to keep updated on wikipedia and import tamplate. See our contribution we are create many tamplate on guwiki. With importer right it is easy. Thanks.-YmKavishwar (talk) 03:25, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Your need to configure transwiki import sources. After that any sysop can do transwiki imports. Ruslik (talk) 10:23, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks sir, m create this task on phabricator.--Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 06:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Marking not done, can be done through other means. Ajraddatz (talk) 06:27, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

YmKavishwar@gu.wikipedia.org

I am nomnated as reviewer and importer (આયાતક) on guwiki. Local sysop cann't access to grant user right.--YmKavishwar (talk) 16:06, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

There is no reviewer right at guwiki. Please, explain why you need the import right. Ruslik (talk) 02:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
We want to keep updated on wikipedia and import tamplate. See our contribution we are create many tamplate on guwiki. With importer right it is easy. Thanks.-YmKavishwar (talk) 03:24, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
As above, resolved through other means. Ajraddatz (talk) 06:27, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

User:S7w4j9 and User:广州阿沾 @zh-yue.wikipedia.org

Done - I have given them both IP block exempt. All the best, Taketa (talk) 08:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

wikinews Thai

Status:    Not done
Please, create a request at Requests_for_new_languages. Ruslik (talk) 14:51, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
This currently exists on incubator, look at Thai Wikinews  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:58, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
The link above goes to an old, closed Thai Wikinews project. The current project on incubator is here: incubator:Wn/th/หน้าหลัก. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

YmKavishwar@hi.wikipedia.org

Now local sysop temporary not active on hiwiki. this nomination for reviewer right.--Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 14:20, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Not done There are multiple active sysops on hiwiki. Please, ask them. Ruslik (talk) 11:11, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
@Ruslik0: sir, currently any sysop not available. All nomination are a waiting.-Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 11:46, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
@YmKavishwar: this is a local issue, and generally not one stewards would be undertaking.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
@Billinghurst: Thanks. Now its solved. Local adminstrator granted this user right.-Yogesh Kavishwar (talk) 14:53, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Renessaince@be.wikisource

Voting has been completed. --Renessaince (talk) 13:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2015-12-16. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. local consensus  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:33, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. Only temporary rights are given now? --Renessaince (talk) 06:11, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
7 active users, 2 or 3 people supporting, yes, only temporary rights.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:17, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
Removed Taketa (talk) 08:49, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Aliwal2012@nso.wikipedia

On hold until 16 September (minimum 1 week for discussion). --MF-W 01:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2015-12-16. Ajraddatz (talk) 06:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
Removed - Taketa (talk) 08:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Kaftaj@myvwikipedia

Requesting sysop`s right for improve erzyawiki--Kaftaj (talk) 17:26, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Done Granted for 4 months to expire on 2015-12-26. To prolong your (interface) adminship, please start another election a few days before your temporary access expires, and after a week post your request again to this page. Thanks. --MF-W 00:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
removed --Stryn (talk) 09:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Исмаил Садуев@cewiki

Hello! I ask to give me a permanent flag Administrator. Sorry that is not waited two weeks I just need to work. Thanks! --Исмаил Садуев (talk) 07:59, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

I am not sure that it is sufficient for permanent adminship. Ruslik (talk) 19:30, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
OK. Then, at your discretion. --Исмаил Садуев (talk) 20:42, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Done Granted for 6 months to expire on 2015-12-28. Ajraddatz (talk) 23:49, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
removed --Stryn (talk) 14:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

gitartha.bordoloi@as.wikisource

I request you to grant me sysop right for 3 more months. Thanks. Gitartha.bordoloi (talk) 18:20, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

 On hold until 15 Dec - Taketa (talk) 21:26, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Done Granted for 3 months to expire on 2016-03-15. As requested —MarcoAurelio 07:20, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Expiring: 20 March 2016

Krinkle@global

Editinterface right per SRGP. SPQRobin (talk) 00:29, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

removed Ajraddatz (talk) 02:56, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Extended till 20 Macrh 2016. Ruslik (talk) 20:18, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Expiring: 23 March 2016

Miscellaneous requests

Bhatakati aatma@gu.wikiquote

I am a new local sysop here. This project is not well set, need to set useful gadget, mediawiki pages. So we'll import a lot of help pages from other wikipedia. But, currently sysop not able to import pages because import sources not available. (see this phabricator ticket, submitted by me) So please grant me importer(આયાતકારો) right for temporary solution. This user group handled by stewards. Thanks.--Bhatakati aatma (talk) 09:48, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Please, wait until the ticket is acted upon. Ruslik (talk) 11:23, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Andrei Stroe@ro.wikibooks

I requested importer (transwiki) rights on this wiki. Very small community, the only vote I got was in favor. I think there shouldn't be any problem to set this right.Andrei Stroe (talk) 11:18, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Done Ruslik (talk) 11:25, 30 December 2015 (UTC)